Our use case is for real-time data integration. It was a preferred tool for this purpose. Additionally, we employed Azure EventHub, another service, as an indicator for real-time data in a couple of larger programs focused on integrating real-time data and visualization.
Kafka and Confluent Cloud have proven to be cost-effective, especially when compared to other tools. In a recent BI integration program over the past year, we assessed multiple use cases spanning ship-to-shore and various Azure integrations. Our findings revealed that Confluent Kafka performed exceptionally well, standing out alongside Genesys and Azure Event Hubs. While these three are top contenders, the choice among other tools depends on the specific use case and project requirements.
The customer initially used tools like SMQs, FITRA, and Stream for real-time data processing. However, after our recommendation, Confluent Cloud proved to be a superior choice, capable of replacing these three tools and simplifying their data infrastructure. This shift to a single tool, Confluent Cloud, streamlined their operations, making maintenance and management more efficient for their internal projects.
Regarding real-time data usage, there were challenges with CDC (Change Data Capture) integrations. Specifically, with PyTRAN, we encountered difficulties. We recommended using our on-premises Kaspersky as an alternative to PyTRAN for that specific use case due to issues with CDC store configuration and log reading challenges with the iton components.
We implemented this solution approximately a year and a half ago for significant projects.
I would rate the stability 8 out of 10.
I would rate the scalability 8 out of 10.
I haven't personally implemented it. The recommendation was made during a consulting program based on a thorough assessment of the tool's capabilities, connectors, and services. However, there hasn't been direct implementation on-site.
While most of the capabilities meet current organizational needs, the pricing is slightly higher. Companies need to consider this aspect in their decision-making process, given the managed and comparatively higher price point. I would rate it an eight due to its capabilities and CDC integrations. It stands out as a top tool that can replace others for real-time data integration processes. The CIBC capability has the potential to handle EDCs effectively. While I assume the support is good for out-of-the-box challenges, I'm not certain about the cost. Overall, I believe it's a strong choice with a rating of eight.