Apr 03, 2023
They are pretty much the same... OPNsense has a better GUI...
The community in pfSense is much bigger... OPNSense has more frequent updates... but other than that... you can not make mistakes...
pfSense and OPNsense are popular firewall solutions. OPNsense seems to have a slight edge due to its comprehensive features and active community, while pfSense excels in customization and support.
Features: pfSense offers extensive customization, a variety of plugins, and strong routing capabilities, making it highly adaptable to complex network environments. OPNsense provides robust features like regular updates, a powerful reporting engine, and integrated two-factor authentication.
Room for Improvement: Users report that pfSense could improve documentation and simplify its installation process. OPNsense could benefit from enhanced compatibility with some hardware and better support options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: pfSense generally receives praise for its straightforward deployment once users get past the initial setup learning curve, with responsive customer support. OPNsense is noted for its user-friendly deployment process and active community support.
Pricing and ROI: pfSense users find the product cost-effective with good long-term ROI due to its extensive customization options and robust features. OPNsense users appreciate the competitive pricing and feel the frequent updates justify the investment, offering good ROI.
I have seen a return on investment with cost savings after implementing Netgate pfSense, as other firewalls would cost me lakhs of rupees while pfSense is free.
We have been saving by having a stable, well-known product.
Netgate pfSense costs significantly less than Ubiquiti, Cisco, or other firewalls out there
The network attacks reduced by approximately 60% after using that, even without customizing the custom configuration yet.
For a very little investment, I was able to increase the security of my network.
When we're down, that's $8000 an hour on a $1500 firewall.
Even when they're in the middle of deploying a new version, I've reached out and received a download link within five minutes.
He had me try several troubleshooting things, identified that the box was bad, and got me a replacement.
Compared to some open-source projects with weak support, OPNsense stands out for having both a strong community and commercial backing options.
I mainly rely on community support since the solution is open source.
If you say you do not have one, it is finished. This is where the monopoly starts.
The next step up now is to the 4100, which gives you an additional preconfigured WAN port that allows you to easily separate networks.
Netgate doesn't come anywhere close to the scalability that its competitors do.
Due to the absence of a single pane of glass management feature, scaling out pfSense becomes quite challenging.
I use Zenarmor, pinning it to one core for packet inspection, and the CPU performance seems very good.
OPNsense's scalability is excellent; I just need to resize my hardware and upgrade the server, and voilà, I am good to go.
In theory, OPNsense can handle small home networks and even large enterprise environments if deployed on sufficiently powerful hardware or virtualized on a clustered system.
Netgate pfSense rates a 10 for stability, and I have experienced no issues there.
Otherwise, I've never seen one have a problem. It's just rock solid.
The solution is stable.
For home and small network use, OPNsense is also reliable, providing enterprise-grade security at no cost.
The only challenge faced was its inadequacy to manage large voice traffic effectively, even with dedicated hardware.
At the latest code level, I haven't experienced any crashes.
You could add AI for troubleshooting with Netgate pfSense because it will be easier for new engineers.
I would like to have the ability to control all my devices from one place.
They need to design for MSPs that are using their products and make centralized management easier.
Enhancing its performance for significant amounts of data traffic would make it closer to a perfect solution.
It would be beneficial if they could create some videos on how to set it up themselves.
The documentation should be clearer because I faced some difficulties navigating many options.
The cost of the 3500 was closer to $4,000.
The total cost of ownership is very low.
For smaller companies or those aiming to reduce expenses, it's a highly affordable option, and even their hardware is reasonably priced.
I consider the pricing of OPNsense to be high when compared with other market products.
OPNsense is free, the licensing and setup was easy.
pfSense's flexibility is great. If you don't have the money to buy the NetGate hardware, anything works with it. You can toss it on any low-end piece of hardware or virtualize it if you choose to virtualize it.
We had downtime before pfSense. We've never gone down using the solution.
It is very stable, and it works very well.
The most valuable features include the basic firewall functionality and the GeoIP location services.
I can have a Wi-Fi VLAN and feel secure that the server network or the VM network that I have on a different VLAN are isolated, and they cannot talk to one another, which adds a great level of security.
It offers enterprise-grade features such as intrusion detection and prevention system, VPN support, traffic shaping, and web filtering, all without license cost.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Netgate pfSense | 7.0% |
| OPNsense | 7.6% |
| Other | 85.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 171 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Netgate pfSense is an open-source firewall and router software known for scalability, cost-effectiveness, and community support. It includes customizable packages for varied network management needs, offering solid performance and straightforward management for diverse setups.
Netgate pfSense provides an impressive range of functionalities including firewall capabilities, VPN options, and extensive customization through packages. Its low resource usage and high availability make it viable for businesses of all sizes, especially when dealing with tailored network demands. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in ease of use, mobile compatibility, and support for plug-ins. Enhanced centralized management, better documentation, and additional security features are frequent requests.
What are the key features of Netgate pfSense?In education and healthcare, Netgate pfSense is employed for secure connectivity and efficient traffic management, accommodating distinct demands of remote access and content filtering. Organizations in these sectors often utilize features such as load balancing and VPNs to maintain secure and reliable network operations while integrating with services like Active Directory for streamlined identity management. Small to medium-sized enterprises benefit from its affordability and robust functionality, making it a go-to choice for managed service environments requiring effective network security and control.
OPNsense is an adaptable open-source firewall and routing platform appreciated for its flexibility, scalability, and user-friendly interface. It is equipped with robust security features and offers excellent reporting and visibility, essential for small businesses and home setups.
OPNsense stands out for its modular design, allowing cost-effective customization. This system supports VPNs and various firewall capabilities, making it suitable for securing networks from malicious traffic. Its frequent updates and extensive documentation, combined with a supportive online community, enhance user experience. However, there is room for improvement in integration with virtual servers and Azure. Scalability and hardware updates are important for large-scale environments, and users desire more reliable VPN solutions and enhanced threat intelligence tools.
What are OPNsense's most important features?OPNsense is implemented in industries requiring VPN and firewall functions, supporting site-to-site connections, protecting servers, and managing commercial network traffic. Companies apply it for security, UTM, SD-WAN, content filtering, intrusion detection, and prevention, utilizing its open-source nature and effectiveness as a next-generation firewall.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
