Microsoft Azure API Management and Amazon API Gateway compete in the API management category. Microsoft Azure seems to have the upper hand due to its integration with its environment, while Amazon is noted for better scalability and affordability.
Features: Microsoft Azure API Management is well-integrated with Azure services, features AD integration for authentication, and offers a comprehensive developer portal. Its policy management and single-platform API orchestration are key strengths. Amazon API Gateway integrates closely with AWS services, boasts robust security, offers seamless serverless functionality, and connects well with AWS tools like Lambda, making it suitable for AWS ecosystem users.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management's premium tier pricing is high, it lacks advanced multi-tenant support, and its customization capabilities need enhancements. Amazon API Gateway could benefit from an improved user interface, more comprehensive developer tools, and better technical support for complex configurations. Both platforms have noted issues with versioning and security optimization, while Amazon users face challenges with API latency and service timeout limits.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure API Management offers hybrid and public cloud deployment options with strong technical support, although response times can vary. Amazon API Gateway provides public and hybrid cloud options but lacks support for on-premises deployment. Its customer support is adequate but could improve in setup assistance and complex query responses. Microsoft users appreciate the direct support lines, whereas Amazon users seek better customer interaction.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management's pricing is competitive with various tiers but can be expensive at the premium level. It offers an advantage in Microsoft-centric environments but might incur additional security costs. Amazon API Gateway is affordable through its pay-per-use model but can become costly with high data volumes. Pricing flexibility is beneficial, though careful cost management is necessary. Users find significant workflow efficiencies in Amazon’s offerings despite the higher base price.
API Gateway saves time and secures my infrastructure, allowing effective deployment.
Proper configuration of the solution, implementation strategy and correct scaling tier selection are other factors that influence the ROI.
It helps connect all multi-environment applications to a single dashboard and give beautiful reports.
If I am working in AWS and with Azure, I see that Azure is much easier and helps save time while also being able to manage and deploy the API services.
Technical support is excellent, deserving a ten out of ten rating.
We benefit from enterprise support, ensuring prompt responses from the technical support team.
We encountered challenges accessing technical support channels, such as a need for a clear telephone number and chat sessions.
The documentation from Microsoft helps our company to solve issues on our own.
The initial support engineers are often not qualified.
I logged an incident, and it was resolved promptly within three hours.
I haven't observed any significant issues indicating a lack of scalability, as it can be efficiently managed through configurations.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
There are one hundred thousand users using it in our company.
I've worked with multiple tools from an observability perspective, such as Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Splunk, and Elasticsearch, and I find KQL and APIM amazing and filled with useful features.
It handles our current workload well, and I'm optimistic it can scale effectively as our needs grow.
There are no limitations to adding any number of devices.
I've deployed it for a client with millions of users without issues.
Our applications are stable, owing partly to our architecture, which is spread across three regions.
The stability is highly guaranteed, as AWS itself provides the cloud service with a reliability of 99.99%.
I can't guarantee its stability or flexibility until all our databases and financial systems are integrated.
Microsoft Azure API Management is very stable.
With high scalability and availability, it supports many users and endpoints without significant issues.
A local version of the API Gateway would be beneficial for testing purposes without incurring extra costs.
Amazon API Gateway needs to focus on minimizing latency.
We use a lot of TerraForm scripts to build up our environment.
The service is extensive and expensive, and this added flexibility would make it more manageable and less prone to errors.
It's quite expensive, which could be a barrier for some users.
Documentations for the product should include examples of implementation.
However, my understanding is that it easily goes to $14,000 or $15,000 USD each month for each account, and we have several such accounts.
It is a really cheap product, but if used incorrectly, it can become expensive.
It is expensive.
It's an expensive solution.
However, once you scale up to your full volume, it'll be more expensive.
Microsoft Azure is an expensive solution not for the large enterprises but for medium and small.
It acts as a master tool, offering easy configuration and excellent integration capabilities with third-party services.
The solution is solid, robust, and scalable.
The tool's most valuable aspect is its scalability.
The platform's most valuable features are its rule-based permissions and comprehensive API lifecycle management capabilities.
The ability to create a subscription model for APIs allows companies to monetize valuable data and share it securely.
The analytics phase of API Management is very beneficial for tracking API usage and identifying suspicious users.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Microsoft Azure API Management | 16.5% |
Amazon API Gateway | 12.9% |
Other | 70.6% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 13 |
Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
Large Enterprise | 21 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 23 |
Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
Large Enterprise | 52 |
Amazon API Gateway facilitates internal APIs exposure to external users, manages requests, and enhances security with authentication. It efficiently handles serverless architectures with AWS Lambda integration, supporting cloud-based API management.
Amazon API Gateway acts as a gateway for backend microservices, making it suitable for real-time use cases. It enables secure communication, traffic routing, and access control management. With its strength in integrating AWS services, it offers excellent scalability, proxy capabilities, and cost-effective management. Users have noted areas for improvement, such as pricing, interface, and the need for better AI-based capabilities. Improvements are also sought in monitoring, security features, and support services.
What features make Amazon API Gateway stand out?Industries utilize Amazon API Gateway to streamline operations in sectors like finance, healthcare, and tech, focusing on real-time data processing and secure communication. The gateway's ability to manage traffic and provide robust security features is key in industries requiring dependable and versatile API management solutions.
Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.
Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.
What key features does it offer?Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.