Leaderboard for Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
Check out the members with the highest scores who have reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services.
#1. Nadeem Nasir
420
Points
IT Manager at Handi Quilter, Inc.
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Experience with update service shows need for reliability, but support excels#2. JitendraInjam
400
Points
IT Lead at 0
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Helps to make updates concerning security and other things but improvement is needed in reporting390
Points
Head of IT department at Monetars
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Helps to update the servers and has Active Directory feature 
#4. Mladen Vidic
305
Points
Senior Oracle DBA at a financial services firm
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Has supported routine update requests and maintained reliable system operations#5. Graham Kingaby
250
Points
Network Manager at Broughton High School
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Old, unreliable, difficult to set up, and does not manage updates across the organization well
#6. RishiPandit
215
Points
Lead - Technical Services at Impetus
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Improves internal database reliability and is easy to install but needs better support
185
Points
Analista de segurança da informação at a tech services company
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Controlled versions to reduce and prevent application crashes
#8. Rafael Araujo
175
Points
Infrastructure and Information Security Supervisor at YKK MALAYSIA SDN BHD
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Efficient with cost-saving update deployment but needs enhanced patch management#9. MINBALEYENEW
150
Points
IT proffesional at Ambo university
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Provides valuable server updates and robust reporting capabilities
#10. Lum Guan Yuan
135
Points
Technical Manager at a retailer
Reviewed Microsoft Windows Server Update Services:
Provides good reporting features, but the approval process must be improved