We use Snyk for the generation of SBOM for Docker. We use it to check the standards of the CSI benchmark that we have implemented in the containers and the applications by Java Spring Boot.
Project Engineer at CDAC
An easy-to-use solution that can be used for the generation of SBOM
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Snyk is the SBOM."
- "It would be helpful if we get a recommendation while doing the scan about the necessary things we need to implement after identifying the vulnerabilities."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Snyk is the SBOM.
What needs improvement?
It would be helpful if we get a recommendation while doing the scan about the necessary things we need to implement after identifying the vulnerabilities. In short, it will be a remediation for the vulnerabilities identified by Snyk.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Snyk for two years.
Buyer's Guide
Snyk
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about Snyk. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Snyk is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Snyk is a scalable solution. As we are an R&D organization, I am the only person managing the solution. However, there are almost 500 employees who are taking advantage of the report we have generated from the Snyk app.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is easy to use and implement.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment steps were easy. The solution's documentation is also easy to use. It took hardly one and a half hours to implement the solution. We implemented Snyk in our virtual private server (VPS).
For deployment, we followed the instructions and created a server for Snyk. Then, we integrated the server with the plug-in using Jenkins. We created a server for Snyk, then used the GitHub repository that mentioned the document and implemented the same. Later, we used the plug-in to connect the server to the Jenkins server.
When the pipeline was built, the process started, as we had mentioned the stage in the Jenkins file, to generate SBOMs and check whether the Docker images were compliant with CSI Benchmarks.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Snyk is an expensive solution.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Snyk, we evaluated a different tool named Dependency-Track. We chose Snyk because Dependency-Track only helped us identify the vulnerabilities in the libraries, and it couldn't solve the issues mentioned in the CIS benchmark.
What other advice do I have?
Snyk helped us identify the composition or the libraries we used in the project, which were vulnerable. It also helped us identify the license agreements from the vendor side.
Software conversion analysis is a mandatory thing that should be implemented in every organization. Most libraries or any third-party libraries are not considered under VAPT. We should also look after the composition of the libraries we use in the project. We should look after these libraries for vulnerabilities, and VAPT should be mandatory in every organization.
I rate Snyk a nine out of ten for the user-friendliness of its user interface.
Currently, my team is looking into whether version numbers are vulnerable. We are also considering the improvisations or research and development we need to do if we need the same library. There are some loopholes that even Snyk has not identified or that it might be working on. Since we have implemented it, we are looking after it.
If a developer requires a particular library with vulnerabilities, we check whether we are using the functions mentioned in the libraries in the project. If we are using it, we are trying to identify exactly which snippet is causing the error. If it is causing a vulnerability, we are considering how to improve it.
We need to think about the decisions we need to make after SCA. It would be a big relief for our organization if Snyk could provide a solution to identify the library snippet that is causing a future vulnerability. We are currently using a team of 30 people to identify this issue.
Overall, I rate Snyk an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Senior Consultant at Hexaware Technologies Limited
Performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools
Pros and Cons
- "Snyk performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools."
- "The solution's reporting and storage could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
The use cases for Snyk are quite progressive. I'm pretty much happy with the solution's performance with SaaS products.
What is most valuable?
Snyk performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools.
What needs improvement?
Snyk can be improved on the reporting aspect regarding the traceability of SCA. It also doesn't have storage. For instance, if you are scanning version 'X' and then you're scanning on another version 'X+1', it doesn't store your information. It doesn't compare particular vulnerabilities between 'X' and 'X+1'. Snyk is helpful and quite handy for people on the development team. The solution's reporting and storage could be improved.
The next release of Snyk should have more training features for developers. The tool offers software composition analysis, and though it says what needs to be fixed, it's in a reactive space. Since DevSecOps has become a culture nowadays, and the industry is going more towards proactive measures, the developers need to be trained.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Snyk for around a year now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
During our POC, I found no stability issues like application downtime or lags. I rate Snyk a nine out of ten for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate Snyk a nine out of ten for scalability. Our clients are enterprise businesses. In the POC state, we don't have an exact number of users because we have one license, but otherwise, five users use Snyk.
How are customer service and support?
A technician was allotted to us, and he responded promptly to our queries and gave timely information. I rate Snyk a nine out of ten for its customer support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The support extended during the POC period was excellent, and we had people supporting us because we needed to add another pipeline channel. Snyk's support feature was really good. Leaving aside certain areas of reporting, I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten.
Once you get the license, it's completely the developer or DevOps team's work to deploy it. The complete process takes two days, but the Snyk site does the deployment in a matter of hours. You purchase the SNC license, which is deployed on the cloud, and then you can call those APIs in your CI pipeline. You can always have it integrated. Once your license is enabled, you have to give access to that particular user.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price. According to the Snyk website, the regular licensing cost is around $ 39 and around $74 per user for CI/CD, with a minimum commitment of five users.
I have not seen any additional costs to the standard licensing fees in our agreement. I need to wait till our agreement renewal to answer this question more effectively.
What other advice do I have?
Snyk is a cloud product. AWS is the cloud provider for Snyk.
People should consider using the scalable model of Snyk for SCA before considering other tools. If you are in the initial security phase or newly setting it up for practice in your organization, I recommend starting with Snyk. Anyone starting into the market and not wanting to invest in a large amount should consider Snyk as an alternative. Snyk is a good tool that provides equivalent security standards compared to other expensive tools.
I've seen the evolution of Snyk in the last four to five years. They started with software composition analysis and have now integrated static application security testing. They have partnerships with various dynamic security testing companies like StackHawk, Rapid7, and InsightAppSec. Snyk is progressive, and they have a good R&D team. I work for a service-based organization, where my job is to understand the customer's pain points and provide consultation. Most customers' pain points are the trade-off between cost and security compliance. Most customers come with financial constraints, and at least a few are opting for Snyk as an option because they were able to get the desired results. And Snyk is doing a pretty good job concerning the standard these customers need to extend to their partners.
Overall, I rate Snyk an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. reseller
Buyer's Guide
Snyk
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about Snyk. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cyber Security Lead at a printing company with 201-500 employees
Does a good analysis from the licensing and open-source perspective, but the UI, reporting, and scanning should be better
Pros and Cons
- "A main feature of Snyk is that when you go with SCA, you do get properly done security composition, also from the licensing and open-source parameters perspective. A lot of companies often use open-source libraries or frameworks in their code, which is a big security concern. Snyk deals with all the things and provides you with a proper report about whether any open-source code or framework that you are using is vulnerable. In that way, Snyk is very good as compared to other tools."
- "It can be improved from the reporting perspective and scanning perspective. They can also improve it on the UI front."
What is our primary use case?
It is for SCA, and we have just been doing the PoC. We are currently using the open-source version for some of the development teams.
What is most valuable?
The main functionality that we found useful is scanning. A main feature of Snyk is that when you go with SCA, you do get properly done security composition, also from the licensing and open-source parameters perspective. A lot of companies often use open-source libraries or frameworks in their code, which is a big security concern. Snyk deals with all the things and provides you with a proper report about whether any open-source code or framework that you are using is vulnerable. In that way, Snyk is very good as compared to other tools.
What needs improvement?
I had a list of what they can improve, and I did share that with them. They are coming up with a beta version.
It can be improved from the reporting perspective and scanning perspective. They can also improve it on the UI front. When we started the PoC five months ago, we encountered all these things. So, I asked them to improve on them. They have come up with a lot of new features, but they are still lacking on the UI front and the reporting side of things.
If you go to the UI front of Snyk, you won't find it so friendly. Another one is that you can't see the projects clearly. It gets all the sources from the repository. It pulls all the projects from the repository and creates a new project altogether for every new addition. So, you can't group them clearly. For example, if I have one product with different repositories, it creates a number of projects underneath in the Snyk UI.
When it comes to reporting, if I run a scan on a particular project, I want the report only for that particular project in a PDF format that I can share with others. Currently, you get the notification over an email with all the projects but not in detail. You have to go to Snyk to find the details of a particular project. You only get a generic view, and you don't get a detailed view of a project. You need to go to the tool, export it as a CSV, and then find it, which is ridiculous. With other tools, once the scan is complete, we can just share the report with the development team that is working on that project, but Snyk doesn't let us do that. They still need to work a lot on the reporting structure.
It also needs to be improved in terms of interdependencies. When you run a code scan, the code can have interdependencies. If you have found a vulnerable line somewhere, it might lead to other interdependencies. Currently, Snyk doesn't provide you with interdependencies. For example, it doesn't provide you with the best location to do the fix. Checkmarx does that, and after you fix a particular line of code, all the other dependencies are automatically fixed. Snyk doesn't offer that. So, you have to do the fix one by one, which is a tedious task for the development team. It takes a lot of effort. I shared this feedback with them, and they might be working on it. They told me that they'll consider that.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Snyk for the past five months.
How are customer service and support?
They are very proactive, sometimes more than what we want them to be. They reach out to us very often, and they are very good with technical support. They reach out to us and just ask us if there are any challenges where they can improve. They're quite open on that front. They don't have any local support as of now, but they are planning for 24/7 support. Currently, they are based only in the US, but they are still very active. Whenever we send out an email, they respond immediately. I would rate them a four out of five.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have worked with other solutions. From the open-source composition and the licensing perspective, they are doing well as compared to competitors such as Black Duck, Veracode, and others. They do well on that front.
Checkmarx is the top one. They need to work very hard to match Checkmarx. Checkmarx is really good as compared to Snyk, but Checkmarx is too expensive. That's the reason we went with Snyk. Checkmarx has a very good scanning engine and technical support. It is also user-friendly. It is quite friendly for developers who are beginners. Anyone can use and learn Checkmarx easily, whereas with Snyk, you need some knowledge before you begin with it.
I had an on-prem Checkmarx. They still do on-prem, and now, they're also coming up with the cloud version. Even if you use the on-prem version, it is quite easy to access the database. You can customize everything based on your needs. From the scanning perspective, if I want to change any policies or rules, it is quite easy with Checkmarx. You just need to change the query inside the database, and you can easily set the rules.
How was the initial setup?
We have only done a PoC. We are yet to finalize the pricing and then deploy the product as a whole. When it comes to PoC, it was quite simple. It was not complex at all. The integrations with GenCAN, or even with GitHub, were quite easy for us. There was no complex structure there. It was straightforward. Once we set up the environment, it took us a few hours to do all the integrations with different repositories or CI/CD. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of ease of the setup.
Currently, we have done it on CI/CD. It is kind of automated. Whenever there is a new build, it automatically triggers the scan.
There are about 30 developers who have been working with it for the PoC. They have been using it on a daily basis for the past four months. Last month, we stopped using it because we have finalized it. Going forward, we will be having 500 developers to begin with.
What about the implementation team?
We did the integration using their documentation. Their documentation was very simple. It was very easy to use.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We are using the open-source version for the scans. We will be going with the full source, license-based version as soon as possible.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate it a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Security Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Developer-friendly with many useful features in the works, but lacks in language and framework coverage
Pros and Cons
- "I think all the standard features are quite useful when it comes to software component scanning, but I also like the new features they're coming out with, such as container scanning, secrets scanning, and static analysis with SAST."
- "For the areas that they're new in, it's very early stages for them. For example, their expertise is in looking at third-party components and packages, which is their bread-and-butter and what they've been doing for ages, but for newer features such as static analysis I don't think they've got compatibility for all the languages and frameworks yet."
What is our primary use case?
I have used Snyk in my present and past workplace, along with Veracode, Checkmarx, and GitHub Advanced Security. The main product that really brought Snyk to market was software component scanning for third-party components, however I like the new things that they're doing as well.
They've got container scanning, which they're just now starting to do, and they're also bringing in new use cases such as static analysis (i.e. SAST) and secrets scanning, although I don't know exactly what's happening on that side of things.
In my previous workplace, we had about 100 users as it was still being scaled up and it was a relatively new product at the time. As for the version number, we use the latest version of Snyk since it is a cloud-based SaaS offering which is always kept up to date.
What is most valuable?
I think all the standard features are quite useful when it comes to software component scanning, but I also like the new features they're coming out with, such as container scanning, secrets scanning, and static analysis with SAST.
The most prominent reason why everybody goes with Snyk as a starting point is because they have an open source offering. As such, it's a developer-friendly solution and our developers really like it for that. In my opinion, that's their very first 'in' from all the avenues within the Software Development Life Cycle, because they deliberately make it developer-friendly from the start, and allow for lots of integration which fits with other tools.
What needs improvement?
For the areas that they're new in, it's very early stages for them. For example, their expertise is in looking at third-party components and packages, which is their bread-and-butter and what they've been doing for ages, but for newer features such as static analysis I don't think they've got compatibility for all the languages and frameworks yet.
That's something I believe will be expanding over time, but I'm not 100% sure when they're going to get to it. Thus, my main concerns for improvement would definitely be greater language and framework coverage, and on a lesser note I would also like to see a reduced number of false positives on their scans.
Then there's the issue of their support. It's not very good, to be honest, and it hasn't been the best experience to deal with them. I think they need to develop proper customer success managers when it comes to Service Level Agreements and how they engage with their customers. On the other hand, their technical support is okay as all the technical aspects are essentially all written down and you just have to follow them.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Snyk for three years up until now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We've had no issues with stability. You can run it with the CLI or the GUI and the stability is very good on both.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have successfully scaled it up to 100 users before, so I would say it is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Our experience with their customer support wasn't the best. My opinion is that they need to develop their customer support channels better, by providing customer success managers to better engage with their customers, for example.
Otherwise, the technical support is adequate. Most of the issues we've encountered were able to be worked out by our own developers since the technical documentation is all written out and simply needs to be followed.
How was the initial setup?
When it comes to installation, Snyk is very good. It's probably one of the easiest, most developer-friendly solutions to install.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, Snyk is a satisfactory solution that I believe could be improved by reducing the number of false positives and extending coverage for more languages and frameworks.
I would rate Snyk a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Open Source License Compliance Service Owner at Visma
Helps to detect security vulnerabilities with good accuracy
Pros and Cons
- "I am impressed with the product's security vulnerability detection. My peers in security are praising the tool for its accuracy to detect security vulnerabilities. The product is very easy to onboard. It doesn't require a lot of preparation or prerequisites. It's a bit of a plug-and-play as long as you're using a package manager or for example, you are using a GitHub repository. And that is an advantage for this tool because developers don't want to add more tools to what they're currently using."
- "The tool needs improvement in license compliance. I would like to see the integration of better policy management in the product's future release. When it comes to the organization that I work for, there are a lot of business units since we are a group of companies. Each of these companies has its specific requirements and its own appetite for risk. This should be able to reflect in flexible policies. We need to be able to configure policies that can be adjusted later or overridden by the business unit that is using the product."
What is our primary use case?
The product helps me with security vulnerability detection.
What is most valuable?
I am impressed with the product's security vulnerability detection. My peers in security are praising the tool for its accuracy in detecting security vulnerabilities. The product is very easy to onboard. It doesn't require a lot of preparation or prerequisites. It's a bit of a plug-and-play as long as you're using a package manager or, for example, you are using a GitHub repository. And that is an advantage for this tool because developers don't want to add more tools to their current use.
What needs improvement?
The tool needs improvement in license compliance. I would like to see the integration of better policy management in the product's future release. When it comes to the organization I work for, there are a lot of business units since we are a group of companies. Each of these companies has its specific requirements and its own appetite for risk. This should be able to reflect in flexible policies. We need to be able to configure policies that can be adjusted later or overridden by the business unit that is using the product.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We haven't had big issues in terms of the product's stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is scalable. In our company, we have a lot of tools that are used for product and software development. We have been able to onboard them and scale up. However, I have to say that when it comes to displaying a dashboard at the organizational level to see all the vulnerabilities, it takes a bit of time to load, which is annoying.
How are customer service and support?
The product has a fantastic tech support team. We actually have a Slack channel with them, and the customer success managers are a click away from providing us with the latest functionalities and updates if there are any interruptions to the service. So there has always been a transparent dialogue between us; we see them as partners in this journey.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
I wasn't involved in the tool's setup, but from my experience or the experience of my colleagues, the process was positive. I didn't hear them have any horror stories from the days when they set it up.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is less expensive than Black Duck.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the product a seven out of ten. Snyk is a fantastic tool for security vulnerability detection in third-party open-source software. You can use this product if your focus is on security vulnerability. On the other hand, if you don't want your developers to invest too much time in documentation and reading white papers on configuring the tool to work for them, you need to use this product.
I would give them extra points for the transparent communication with the customer and their openness towards improving their product. And I think they have a lot of potential to improve and become a great SCA tool.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Security Engineer-DevSecOps at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
A stable solution that provides excellent features and enables users to identify vulnerabilities in the application plug-ins
Pros and Cons
- "Static code analysis is one of the best features of the solution."
- "The product is very expensive."
What is our primary use case?
We use the product mainly for software composition analysis. It is used to identify vulnerabilities in the application plug-ins. If we use Python 3.8, it’ll tell us that the version is outdated and that it has several vulnerabilities. It also helps in threat identification. It also provides infrastructure as code.
What is most valuable?
Static code analysis is one of the best features of the solution.
What needs improvement?
The product is very expensive.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have around 2000 users. Every developer in the organization has access to it.
How are customer service and support?
The support has improved a lot.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
We use the SaaS version. The initial setup is easy. We just have to click the buttons.
What was our ROI?
I do not think that the tool is worth the money. A lot of free tools are available online.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution costs half a million dollars per year. It depends on the number of users. If the number of users increases, the cost will increase further.
What other advice do I have?
People who want to use the product must utilize the code analysis on IDE. It would really help a lot of the developers. It performs the shift left concept very well. It is a very good tool, but the pricing is absurd. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Supports multiple programming languages for security practices
Pros and Cons
- "Snyk's focus on security is a valuable feature. Also Snyk supports multiple programming languages, which has positively affected my security practices. I use only two or three languages, and when I change the language in a file, it detects it in the same suite. I find the AI-powered scanning overall beneficial.Using Snyk's AI-powered scanning, I can detect around ten or twenty errors in my project with about twenty thousand lines of code, so it helps improve my project by identifying a lot of potential vulnerabilities."
- "I use Snyk alongside Sonar, and Snyk tends to generate a lot of false positives. Improving the overall report quality and reducing false positives would be beneficial. I don't need additional features; just improving the existing ones would be enough."
What is our primary use case?
Snyk protects vulnerabilities in the code as usual, detects abnormal data flow inside the field, and similar tasks.
How has it helped my organization?
The specific feature of Snyk that has significantly improved my vulnerability management is its ability to identify vulnerabilities and suggest solutions to fix them. Snyk's automation capabilities streamline my security tasks by scanning code every time I commit.
What is most valuable?
Snyk's focus on security is a valuable feature. Also, Snyk supports multiple programming languages, which has positively affected my security practices. I use only two or three languages, and when I change the language in a file, it detects it in the same suite.
I find the AI-powered scanning beneficial. Using Snyk's AI-powered scanning, I can detect around ten or twenty errors in my project with about twenty thousand lines of code, so it helps improve my project by identifying a lot of potential vulnerabilities.
What needs improvement?
I use Snyk alongside Sonar, and Snyk tends to generate a lot of false positives. Improving the overall report quality and reducing false positives would be beneficial.
I don't need additional features; just improving the existing ones would be enough.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It scans the entire code really fast, and the auto-scan process is done repeatedly.
I would rate the stability of Snyk an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It detects issues really fast, but it still has a lot of false positives, and sometimes the suggestions aren't quite on point. This can sometimes lead to other vulnerabilities.
I would rate the scalability of Snyk a seven out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
I would rate the initial setup of Snyk a nine out of ten because it's straightforward. The web version is also easy to use. I'm working with both the web version and the IDE at the same time.
For deployment, I just link it to GitHub, upload the repository there and it automatically scans for any errors. It took around a minute to deploy Snyk.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'm currently using the free version, which the company offers before buying the full version. So, the price is affordable, especially for an enterprise.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did evaluate other options before choosing Snyk. I only considered Sonar before Snyk, but I ended up with Snyk because it's faster and more focused on security.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others considering using Snyk is to rely on it for security issues but still manually review your overall code. It's great for detecting syntax errors but might miss some broader issues, so it's important to do a thorough check yourself.
Based on my experience, I'd rate Snyk an eight overall. Its performance is indeed good.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
DevOps Engineer at Ramboll
Check vulnerabilities and rectify potential leaks in GitHub
Pros and Cons
- "We use Snyk to check vulnerabilities and rectify potential leaks in GitHub."
- "The tool's initial use is complex."
What is our primary use case?
We use Snyk to check vulnerabilities and rectify potential leaks in GitHub.
What needs improvement?
The tool's initial use is complex.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with the product for three to four months.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Snyk Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Product Categories
Application Security Tools Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Cloud Management Container Security Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Software Development Analytics Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) DevSecOps Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)Popular Comparisons
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Wiz
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
GitLab
Checkmarx One
Veracode
Qualys VMDR
Coverity
Black Duck
Mend.io
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
OWASP Zap
OpenText Core Application Security
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Snyk Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which software is ideal for code quality and security?
- How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?
- How do you use Snyk for running SAST?
- What do I scan when changing code in Snyk?
- If you had to both encrypt and compress data during transmission, which would you do first and why?
- When evaluating Application Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- We're evaluating Tripwire, what else should we consider?
- Which application security solutions include both vulnerability scans and quality checks?