It is primarily used to centrally manage endpoint security solutions on end-user machines. This means organizations can use it to apply and enforce security policies and manage various security features like antivirus, anti-malware, data loss prevention, and other Sophos security components on the endpoint devices used by their employees or users.
The interface, especially when using the software center, is quite user-friendly and easy to navigate. Managing security policies within it is a seamless and straightforward process, offering a smooth experience.
There are situations where manual intervention is necessary, particularly when dealing with certain types of threats. While many security processes run smoothly, in cases of specific attacks that aren't automatically resolved, the need for manual intervention arises. Improving the response time of the customer support team would be beneficial.
I have been working with it for over eight years.
It is quite stable, with only potential issues that might arise when specific Windows updates or packages cause problems, in which case you may need to collaborate with the Sophos Central support team to address them. I would rate it nine out of ten.
It provides excellent scalability. Everything is centralized, and the scalability depends on your licensing. Customers don't have to invest in network infrastructure or data centers to expand their security solutions.
The support is decent but not exceptional, particularly when compared to the capabilities of the software itself. If I were to rate it, I would give it a seven out of ten.
Neutral
I've had experience with both on-premise solutions and Symantec. When it comes to the management aspect, Sophos Central stands out as the better option. However, as a product and considering the overall capabilities of the company, I must say that Symantec is also an excellent product.
The initial setup is quite straightforward.
You can easily set up a user account in Sophos Central, and based on the user's operating system, you can swiftly download the client. Installing it on the machine is a simple step, and it will automatically connect to the central dashboard, displaying all the necessary information. Deployment is hassle-free and user-friendly. Setting up the portal is usually a quick and straightforward task, but it can take longer when dealing with a large user base, like hundreds of thousands. Even with many users, the process is relatively smooth. Managing numerous users can be more challenging, but deploying directly from domain controllers is an option. The primary aim is to ensure the overall system's security. For a case involving around five hundred users, the setup may take approximately three to four days. Maintenance is relatively hassle-free, and overall, it's quite easy to manage.
When compared to the market, it's relatively more cost-effective. You only need to pay for the license, which includes everything. However, if you require managed services, such as MTR with a dedicated support team providing live sessions, there are additional licensing costs involved.
It ultimately comes down to the customer's preferences and budget. If a customer prefers to handle every alert, incident, and threat on their own, that's perfectly acceptable. However, if they require premium support, then they should opt for services like MTR. The choice depends on their specific needs and the resources they're willing to allocate. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.
