The primary use case of this solution is for network security, to deploy controlled users, and to prevent the network from attacks.
The deployment model we are using is on-premises.
The primary use case of this solution is for network security, to deploy controlled users, and to prevent the network from attacks.
The deployment model we are using is on-premises.
The solution permits me to control everything in the network including, users, Wi-Fi, access, Kuta for users, and load balancing.
It has also taught me how to deal with users with vulnerabilities, the good side and the bad side of the solution, and how to control users from anywhere.
The most valuable features of this solution are the URL filtering database. It is great and contains all internet categories.
The interface has great scalability. I can turn them into what I want including hybrid, bridge, or into a router mode.
The security has no back doors. It's more secure than other solutions and the hardware performance is also better than others.
The pricing of this solution needs to be decreased.
Authentication needs to be improved. If any user out of my domain wants to authenticate, he can't because the captive portal is not compatible with many browsers, like Google Chrome. This is a big problem that we are having with the captive portal. It needs to be improved.
Also, security policy needs to be more straightforward and easier.
In the next release, I would like to see the Security Policy simplified. It has a few features, like, Filter-NAT, URL filtering, and SSL filtering, but it would be nice if there were a way to combine the features in one tab or to create a setup wizard for this option.
I would like to create a Filer-NAT rule to decrypt or to block some sites with HTTPS and HTTP. I think that there is a way to combine them using a wizard to create the rule.
This solution is stable.
This solution is scalable.
We have five hundred users, and six of them are technicians.
I am from the Middle East and they are in America. I contacted them twice and they were very helpful. They helped me to test the situation.
Previously we did not use another solution. This was the first one.
The initial setup was not complex for me, but it was for other technicians who were using the firewall. They need time to understand how the firewall is used.
The deployment took about two days to complete and deploy correctly.
The implementation was done by myself. I am the technical support in Egypt. I have been told by other agents that they prefer to work with me and no other agents.
You can choose between a standard license and a premium license.
Before choosing, we evaluated FortiGate. It was lower than Stormshield by almost double.
We chose to go with Stormshield because it is well known on the market, just like Apple and Samsung. Most are aware of this solution and go with it.
Also, it has task managing, and I haven't seen it in any other solution.
I did a comparison between FortiGate, Sophos, and Stormshield. The result was that Stormshield was better. It is stable and it has great hardware performance and security features.
I would advise others to buy an extended license for this solution. They will benefit from Kasperky Antivirus, the extended control option, and the vulnerability manager. It's a great tool for IT.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.