Wazuh Reviews

We recommend and assist our clients using Wazuh for semi-custom solutions for critical sectors like telecommunication, healthcare, government, or military. Wazuh helps them solve critical in a limited time. Their operations are already digital, but I haven't worked with highly critical customers. 

My customers mainly use Wazuh for threat detection in industries with mostly Windows servers. We monitor server changes like password changes and account privilege changes. Wazuh makes it easy to track these changes without needing to check the domain controller. We open the Wazuh interface to see all the details. That's why I love Wazuh, though I get nervous too.

Regarding Wazuh, I find the SCA (Security Configuration Assessment) features most valuable. It's crucial for asset management and inventory, allowing us to monitorendpoints and servers' changes easily. This is particularly important for my customers, who aren't heavily focused on incident response but rely on asset management and inventories.

Wazuh's compliance management features are very supportive, especially in regions like the Americas and Europe. However, it's less effective in the ANZ (Australia and New Zealand) region since Wazuh doesn't cater to the specific compliance standards there, such as those required in Australia. I appreciate that Wazuh fully complies with PCI DSS and GDPR standards, allowing us to generate necessary reports.

I want more support for regional compliance standards to serve my ANZ region customers better.

I have been using Wazuh for the past three years.

Regarding stability, I would rate it a seven out of ten. It needs improvements, especially compared to products like IBM QRadar and other cloud-based solutions.

I rate the scalability of Wazuh as a four out of ten. While my customers are generally satisfied and do not have highly critical requirements, I see areas for improvement as a technical person.

The technical support for Wazuh's licensed products is decent. Sometimes, there are delayed response and resolution times, which can be frustrating. 

Wazuh is deployed on the cloud and on-premises in our customers' organisations. Deploying Wazuh depends on the customer's requirements; smaller customers take less time, but complex needs can extend the process. Typically, deployment is completed within a month.

The initial setup was somewhat challenging for us, especially when we tried to do it independently. We faced some implementation issues but found solutions indicating ongoing product improvements. Sometimes, we face compatibility issues with certain industry products, requiring custom solutions, which can be a bit of a headache. However, we've managed to address these challenges over time. I would rate the setup process a five out of ten.

Wazuh is deployed on the cloud and on-premises in our customers' organisations. Deploying Wazuh depends on the customer's requirements; smaller customers take less time, but complex needs can extend the process. Typically, deployment is completed within a month.

Overall, I would rate Wazuh as seven out of ten.

I use the solution in my company as an open-source tool and in our organization as an SIEM and XDR. We mainly use it as a SIEM tool. Moreover, we can use it with Palo Alto Networks XDR for vulnerability scanning because it provides us with vulnerability detection modules. We also use SDS and IDS frameworks as my company is a fintech. We use PCI DSS and NIST 800-53 framework, which is provided by Wazuh.

The solution's most valuable features are the SIEM modules, vulnerability detection modules, NIST 800-53, and the MITRE framework. I think these four are the most valuable core things provided by Wazuh as an open-source tool.

Wazuh currently fails to provide its users with AI and ML. From an improvement perspective, Wazuh needs to offer AI and ML to its customers. I want Wazuh to integrate with AI capabilities since it can help users do proactive monitoring.

I think scalability can be improved by using better indexer indices in Wazuh and by improving dashboarding. We can enhance Wazuh manager and Wazuh indexer.

I have been using Wazuh for more than a year. I use Wazuh version 4.7.2.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

When it comes to stability, we have faced difficulty getting a lot of data or selecting the data from before 60 days sixteen years. Wazuh's access parts also stop responding to other users.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

More than 100 people in my company use Wazuh.

I think Wazuh is used daily to check alerts, dashboards, and other related stuff.

I will use it in the future as a SIEM tool.

I have not received technical support for the solution. I got help from the Wazuh and Slack communities.

If one is difficult and ten means an easy setup phase, I rate the product's initial setup phase a seven out of ten. The product's initial setup phase was easy.

I have not faced any challenges during the product's installation phase. I was unable to change the admin password. The default admin password for admins couldn't be changed, and I am still unable to change my password because it does not allow me to change its admin password.

I was involved directly in the deployment process.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in a single day.

I single-handedly deployed the product.

Wazuh is an open-source tool.

After evaluations, my company has figured out that Wazuh is very expensive for our infrastructure and for the log ingestion process.

The vulnerability detection module and the MITRE framework are helpful because we are using the tool in our own data centers. The vulnerability detection module prevents us from being exploited by different vulnerabilities and different packages existing in our environment.

Wazuh's compliance management feature supports your regulatory requirements since it provides PCI DSS and NIST 800-53 framework. In general, the tool provides us with the baseline that is required.

I need two people to maintain it constantly and to monitor Wazuh so that we can resolve different types of space alerts and manage different file systems attached to it.

The tool is good, but you should be prepared to put in some manual effort to use it and also have some good technical support to perform the manual functions and operations you need in Wazuh.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Our company only has a small five-person team working with Wazuh. We wanted a log management solution that we could deploy onto our cloud, so we deployed Wazuh on Kubernetes and integrated different log sources into a centralized logging solution.

The second use case is log searching. We wanted a usable integrated search, and Wazuh a good search integrated usable. Wazuh has support for Elasticsearch, which provides searching capabilities. Cost-effectiveness was important for us, and Wazuh is a top open source solution. 

Wazuh's logging features integrate seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services. There are also Wazuh agent configurations for different use cases, like vulnerability scanning, host-based intrusion detection, and file integrity monitoring. 

Scalability is a constraint in the on-prem version of Wazuh in terms of the volume of logs we can manage. There are some minor glitches, but that's part of every tool, and they usually get addressed in subsequent updates.

I would like to see more Kubernetes security and log integrations. That will be one of the good things. Wazuh supports AWS or GCP cloud-native service integration, but it would be great if they added support for Kubernetes security and AWS or Azure-managed Kubernetes solutions. 

We've used Wazuh for two years.

Wazuh is pretty stable. There are no major issues, but sometimes we face minor glitches. It's open source, so we can't expect every bug to be documented. We discover some new issues from time to time, but that's part of using an open-source solution. You pay for a licensed product or you deal with minor problems in open source. 

Wazuh's scalability has room for improvement.

We paid for technical support, but they do have a robust community and Slack channels and all that stuff. You can find most of the answers you need in the community groups or forums. I rate Wazuh support eight out of 10. 

I worked with Splunk, Curator, ArcSight, and some legacy solutions that no longer exist. They became obsolete or transitioned to a different product. Cost-effectiveness was one reason we switched. We had to decide whether to spend $500,000 on a commercial product or rely on our skills to deploy an open-source solution. 

The big difference between Wazuh and other solutions is maturity and customization. Wazuh's scalability and out-of-the-box functionality are slightly lagging behind, but Wazuh has improved a lot since the first time we saw it. Others have more search capabilities, whereas Wazuh depends on Elasticsearch. Searching is a bit slower in Wazuh.

I rate the Wazuh setup experience nine out of 10. The basic setup was straightforward, but our deployment was slightly complex because we did a lot of customization. It took us a week to deploy and fine-tune the initial setups. After deployment, the only maintenance task is rotating particular logs. If we don't rotate it correctly, the log storage runs out and services stop.

Wazuh is open-source, so we didn't have a support person or any professional services to help us. Fortunately, the documentation is excellent, and they have good community support as well.

Wazuh is an open-source solution, so the only expenses are Elasticsearch and log storage costs. Log storage costs no more than $20,000 to $30,000 annually. It's around $3,000 a month. It's all money in the bank. We don't have to spend anything except for resources. 

I rate Wazuh nine out of 10. It's a powerful tool, and you can do lots of things with it. Wazuh is a good choice if you're on a tight budget, but you need to have an enterprise-level SIEM deployment.

If someone doesn't know how to manage large-scale log management solutions, you should start small and grow your experience. You can start with Wazuh and switch to an enterprise solution once you start scaling up. 

Wazuh is very good. It offers the ability to measure and benchmark your environment to one of the standards. We installed it on the customer's premises and benchmarked it against CIS controls. We are not in a big environment, and we haven't tested Wazuh for long.

The main thing I like about it is that it has an EDR. Other than that, I like that it allows us to benchmark against the standard. It even suggests ways to improve things. Wazuh helps us to research how we can meet the benchmark.

What I also like about Wazuh is that you can deploy the agents in Linux and Unix environments, such as HP, IBM, and Oracle servers. Those servers use UX and AIX environments. The solution has Solaris agents, too. It has agents for all platforms.

I have yet to find the same capability in Wazuh to get logs from different sources into the system. I haven't been able to explore that.

There are many functions I want to add. For example, I want to get feeds from different places through threat intelligence. If the feature is there, it needs to be matured. Threat intelligence is key to the use case I've deployed the solution for. It would be good if Wazuh correlated it with the internal and external feeds. Integrating Wazuh with other platforms is a key aspect.

I recently started using Wazuh. It's been about two months.

I rate Wazuh's stability a seven out of ten. It's stable. It's been working so far, and I have no reason to complain.

We have 20 endpoints on Wazuh and two or three administrators for now managing the solution.

I used an old SIEM before Wazuh. Wazuh is more stable. I preferred Wazuh because it's open source. The old SIEM is closing in on the product, though.

The initial setup is really simple. It took three hours to deploy Wazuh.

I implemented Wazuh myself since I'm an experienced administrator.

We use the free version of Wazuh. We will eventually move on to the commercial version.

I did some research, but I didn't test. The research was based on user opinions. I saw that most people have tested Wazuh. You can easily get resources online to help you to use the product. Wazuh is getting more popular. If you have a problem, you are not on your own.

Another solution we evaluated was Security Onion, but it was based on a platform that may be at the end of its life, which is Linux Red Hat. Linux Red Hat seems to be on shaky ground, and we don't know where it's headed. We wanted something that provides a roadmap that is not ending soon.

We're still in a test phase with Wazuh. I'm testing integration with the tools that other tools that we are using in a clustered environment. We can adapt the solution on the way forward.

I rate Wazuh a seven out of ten.

We use it as a cost-effective solution for our customers who are in the initial stages of adopting security measures. Many of these customers are new to security practices and are primarily seeking compliance with regulations.

Its cost-effectiveness is the most valuable aspect.

There is room for improvement in terms of simplifying the deployment process. In addition, it would be beneficial if Wazuh focused on expanding its offensive modules as the primary enhancement. Another valuable development would be the introduction of a Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response capability. It could work on further developing its threat intelligence offerings as the third priority.

I have been using it for two years.

We haven't faced any issues or challenges regarding its stability.

One of the challenges we face in Indonesia is the time zone difference when seeking support. The support team could be more responsive and provide quicker replies during our working hours in Indonesia, which would be a significant improvement.

Negative

I have experience with IBM QRadar. The key distinction between them and Wazuh is the presence of additional modules in IBM QRadar that are not found in Wazuh. IBM QRadar provides Security Orchestration Automation and Response capabilities, while Wazuh does not offer this feature.

The initial setup is relatively smooth and typically takes approximately one week to complete.

For the deployment process, I usually allocate one or two individuals. The first person is an infrastructure engineer, and the second is a Wazuh administrator. The deployment process involves several phases. The initial step is the assessment phase, where we evaluate the customer's assets, such as the number and types of assets and the specific logs they want to send. The second step involves implementing the assessment data and configuring it in the Wazuh engine. After completing the implementation, we move to the third phase, which focuses on operational tasks. In cases where a customer has new assets and there are no existing templates for parsing the data, our team needs to manually create these parsing templates. I would rate it six out of ten.

It is a cost-effective solution.

When customers prioritize enhanced security and rapid cyberattack detection, and they have a more substantial budget to work with, I typically recommend IBM QRadar. For customers who are still in the early stages of security adoption, Wazuh is my preferred suggestion. It is a suitable choice for smaller companies, as larger organizations, particularly those in the financial industry, tend to have more experienced and knowledgeable security teams. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

The primary use case for Wazuh is the detection of malware.

It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection. It is easy to install, configure, and run, requiring minimum resource investment, even for small-scale deployments on personal devices.

Improving the abilities related to security threat mapping, such as threat map landscape visualization, would be a great benefit. Adding the flexibility to integrate various plug-ins or modules into its core system would enhance functionality.

I have been working with it for two years.

I would rate the stability eight out of ten.

I used Azure documentation and report storage, while researching other internet resources to gain a broader perspective on different product capabilities that are available for learning and deployment needs. Wazuh offers excellent features.

When I contacted customer care, they mentioned bundling options, that I found to be overall affordable.

I would recommend this product to other users in the field of cybersecurity. It provides enhanced network security and many useful features. It is easy to use, with a pricing structure that is more affordable compared to other options. I would rate it eight out of ten.

I use the solution in my company for XDR and SIEM.

The solution's most valuable feature is that its XDR part provides a very good experience compared to other open-source software. Wazuh is also better than the existing XDR apps.

Wazuh needs improvement in terms of AI. All the tools, whether SIEM or other tools, are focused on AI-based areas. Wazuh should plan to integrate with the AI part.

The product's configuration part and lack of AI capabilities are some of the major concerns associated with Wazuh.

Considering the current technology, the entire infra will be changed for quantum computing and security. We need AI, which is drastically evolving. We needed some alignment with the AI-based Wazuh, and I believe it would be a very promising development since it would not be stable otherwise. Splunk has started working on AI-related stuff. Wazuh's XDR is very good.

I have been using Wazuh for three years. My company has a partnership with Wazuh.

The tool is very powerful, without a doubt. It is a stable tool. Wazuh is better than Splunk, and I say so since it is very suitable for small and mid-level businesses with lower data volume. Splunk is the best if we need to deal with a higher volume. I can go ahead with Splunk if it is a higher volume. When it comes to small and middle-level businesses, our organization, Wazuh, which has the lowest data volumes, is the best and most stable tool.

When it comes to scalability, there are two things to consider while scaling up Wazuh's deployment. One is that our server and infra facilities should be aligned properly. Wazuh is a scalable tool. I can say the only drawback is that one requires technical knowledge to set up and configure the tool.

The solution's technical support quality is mid-range. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.

Neutral

It is easy to install and deploy the tool, but only an experienced person can handle such areas. It means the subject matter expert can handle the tool. It cannot be given to someone randomly as the person needs to have some expertise.

The solution is easy to maintain.

Three people can deploy the solution.

Wazuh has given some timelines for the average deployment, but I must ask my team about it.

The product price is neither too high nor too low. A lot of small players can easily adapt to Wazuh. Many are interested in adopting Wazuh in their own infrastructure.

I would say that Wazuh's threat detection capabilities are effective at around 80 percent.

Regarding compliance and integrity monitoring, I would say that the problem stems from the fact that someone who doesn't know or has any background associated with Wazuh or someone junior in the profession cannot configure the product. An experienced person should configure Wazuh, and then only we can get the settings right because it is mostly a configuration-based tool. There are a lot of things in the configuration-based part. The product offers seamless integration capabilities.

I will have to ask my team members about details related to the operational cost and security incident response time associated with the solution.

My final bottom line recommendation to others is that they should consider whether they are using small volumes, and if so, it means their organization is small or mid-sized and is using very few data volumes for which Wazuh is the best choice instead of Graylog, Splunk or some other tool. We need the expertise to set up and configure the tool properly. Expertise and knowledge should be the key thing if anybody needs to adopt the tool. Others need to consider the tool's readiness for the AI revolution.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Our main use case for Wazuh is in the healthcare industry, where we deploy it to help companies monitor their products during deployment. However, we also utilize Wazuh for IoT and OT, as well as for endpoint detection and response.

In our company, around 200-300 people are using Wazuh. Most of them are regular employees, such as HR and IT personnel. Additionally, there are some stock traders who also use the solution.

There are three key strengths of Wazuh that stand out to me. 

Firstly, Wazuh offers an enhanced HDR version that outperforms the Elastic Stack. Wazuh has achieved this by running a config or a sec in the background, which has improved the XBR for endpoint security significantly.

Secondly, Wazuh comes with built-in frameworks, such as the NISC and ISO, that make it easy to comply with various industry standards. We didn't need to configure any custom frameworks for this, as Wazuh had it built in.

Lastly, Wazuh has the ability to collect terabytes of data within seconds, which is a crucial feature for modern enterprises dealing with large amounts of data.

One area where Wazuh could be improved is scalability. While it is scalable, it can suffer from reduced latencies.

In the next release, I would like to see a more seamless combination of a SIEM system. However, the current SIEM system can be noisy at times, resulting in false positives instead of true positives. In comparison, Splunk has been able to reduce the number of false positives in its system.

As a stock analyst, I have been using Wazuh as my preferred solution for the past three and a half years, and I am currently using the latest version available.

I would rate the stability of Wazuh a six out of ten. At times, there have been issues with bugs in the configuration, which can lead to unexpected use cases.

I would rate the scalability of Wazuh a seven out of ten because it cannot perform deep data analysis.

A few years back, when I deployed Wazuh for the first time, there was no cloud model available, so they didn't offer support for on-premises deployments. However, with the cloud model now in place, the support is much better. That being said, the customer service and support still require improvement.

Neutral

I found it to be more straightforward compared to other products like Splunk and Scalyr.

You can get started within five minutes.

Deploying Wazuh can be done by one person, but for proper configuration within a specific use case, it is recommended to have at least three to four experienced individuals involved in the deployment process.

I have a level three analyst on my team, and as a stock analyst, I am aware that they also offer an MSP program that provides partnership offerings and other related services. However, I am not very familiar with it.

Wazuh's licensing is based on the cloud. For instance, if you need to analyze a chunk of data, the approximate monthly price would be around $23 to $24.

Compared to its competitors like ELK Stack and other similar products, Wazuh offers a reasonable price point, with many of its competitors priced higher.

I have used Splunk.

Based on the current market trend, I would highly recommend Wazuh to other users. It is an open-source tool that is highly scalable and provides custom alerting features that are not available from most other vendors. While ELK stack is the only other comparable open-source option, Wazuh's advanced capabilities make it a strong contender.

In general terms, if you're looking for a scalable and efficient SIEM solution that provides accurate alerting without too much noise, I would confidently recommend Wazuh to nine out of ten users.

We primarily use the solution as a cybersecurity monitoring solution. It has a powerful endpoint agent and can work as an EDR for endpoint detection and response. 

We gather information about the company and identify data sources. We develop a use case around them and have a specified case output. For example, if we want to do hard test or service scans, we gather some event logs from the firewalls, et cetera, and develop some logic. The logic will help us detect anomalies during hard scans. We use Wazuh for log extraction and logic application. It is a general framework. 

We like the fact that it is open-source and free to use. 

It is a total solution. We don't have to spend money, and we get almost everything we need from one source. 

It's stable.

The solution can scale. 

My understanding is the latest version, eight, can't support the latest version of Elasticsearch.

The older versions do not support EQ query syntax. There need to be more languages on offer. 

They need to improve collation detection.

The deployment is a bit complex. 

The performance is very good. It's reliable. It's better than Splunk. I'd rate the stability eight out of ten. 

The solution is scalable. I'd rate the ability to scale nine out of ten.

We have 13 people using the solution, and we provide some services to different companies. We work as an MSP.

I can't speak to support. We have some limitations when it comes to receiving support. We cannot directly contact the company as we are in Iran. 

I am also familiar with Splunk. I find this product to offer better performance. Splunk is also a commercial solution. It is not open-source.

The solution offers a complex deployment. We wanted to divide it up and set different modules on different machines. That made it a bit more difficult. 

I'd rate the ease of setup sic out of ten. While for smaller setups, the situation may be more straightforward, for larger enterprise-level setups, it can get complex. 

The deployment happens across many phases. There's the identification of scope, assets, and communication. Then, you need to deploy to a basic cluster. After that, you need to collect logs from various areas of the organization. Then, there's the normalization and parsing of event logs and verification processes. 

We managed a deployment with three people. However, a higher-level installation would likely need more people. We only need two or three people to handle maintenance for 24/7 coverage. If we drop that to work hours only, we need one or two people to cover maintenance. 

The solution is open-source. We do not have to pay for a license. 

I'm an end-user.

We are not using the latest version of the solution as it may not be compatible with Elasticsearch. We use version seven. 

I'd highly recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it seven out of ten. 

Our primary use case for Wazuh is monitoring endpoints. The second is incident management. Logging is essential for us because of Indian IT compliance rules require us to store logs for 180 days. We need to monitor and maintain logs also. 

Wazuh is monitoring around 1,200 inputs, but there are only about four or five members of the IT team directly using the solution. 

The configuration assessment and pile integrity monitoring features are decent.

Log data analysis could be improved. My IT team has been looking for an alternative because they want better log data for malware detection. We are also doing more container implementation also, so we need better container security, log data analysis, auditing and compliance, malware detection, etc. 

Overall, the implementation part of Azure is tricky. It can be simplified and automated more to shorten the deployment timeline, so we can immediately onboard the application. The entire implementation process should be user-friendly.

We implemented Wazuh in 2019.

I rate Wazuh six out of 10 for stability. While we haven't seen any incidents lately, it used to crash a few years back. The dashboard would be inaccessible due to some service failure or something. 

I rate Wazuh eight out of 10 for scalability.

We use community forums like Stack Overflow to find answers. Most debugging and troubleshooting processes are readily available online. 

Setting up Wazuh is complex. The deployment involved two IT engineers and took about two months

We deployed Wazuh. 

Wazuh is a free solution. 

We tried to replace Wazuh with a CrowdStrike real-time security solution. We also tried some solutions from one of our vendors We want to move to either Elastic or CrowdStrike.

I rate Wazuh six out of 10. It's a solid open-source. Stability-wise, Wazuh seems to have fixed all the past issues, and the latest version is possibly the most stable. However, they need to add more features to keep up with the competition. Compared to products like Elastic, Wazuh still lacks a lot of in-depth information. It's still not possible to do a dive, and the configuration could be easier.