Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Reviews

When clients need solutions, I use Amazon EBS for presenting the data to the servers. I use EBS for storing data of SQL and different data of the clients.

Amazon EBS stands out due to features like its configuration and IOPS, which can be beneficial for the servers in my organization. The scalability allowed by cloud solutions, such as auto-scaling and this storage capability, is an important feature of Amazon EBS. EBS is a cost-effective solution, where I pay as I go, making it a favorable option.

Amazon EBS could improve by offering immutability of the data. This feature is not certain, but it could be beneficial.

I have been using Amazon EBS for around one year. I am not entirely sure of the exact duration.

All cloud solutions permit scalability, and this is an important feature. The storage capabilities ensure stability and are significant for operations.

I have not had contact with Amazon's customer service, however, I have heard it's really good.

Neutral

The setup of Amazon EBS is easy. On a scale of one to ten, with ten being the easiest, I would give it an eight.

In my company, I have eight people working on cloud solutions, including AWS.

The ROI varies depending on the project, with a return ranging from 20% to 25%.

Amazon EBS is not expensive. It is equal in cost to other cloud storage solutions like Azure.

Amazon and Microsoft Azure are both solutions I have worked with. I predominantly use AWS in my work.

Overall, I would rate Amazon EBS an eight out of ten.

The primary use case for Amazon EBS is the attachment of virtual machines and file shares. I also use it for mounting EC2 machines with storage for EC2 instances, intending to use it for applications requiring high throughput or IOPS, big data analysis, log processing, data warehousing, EBS backup, or data recovery, and hosting file stores, such as NTFS and XFS.

I am using Amazon EBS mainly for the attachment of virtual machines and file shares. I find it valuable for applications requiring high throughput or IOPS and mention its stability and performance as significant factors. 

I use it for big data analysis, log processing, and data warehousing. Additionally, I use EBS for backup or data recovery and hosting file stores, such as NTFS and XFS.

The main challenge with Amazon EBS is cost management, as it is a high-performance volume. Sequencing and IOPS relative to cost are also areas of concern. 

Additionally, data durability can be an issue, with risks of accidental deletion or corruption.

I have three years of experience using Amazon EBS and S3.

The stability of Amazon EBS is characterized by its performance and scalability. It is designed to provide high throughput and low transaction costs.

Amazon EBS is scalable only vertically, meaning I can scale up yet not down.

I have experienced high costs as a primary issue with Amazon's support. I have raised a ticket regarding the high costs related to EBS technical support.

Positive

Last year, my company partnered with AWS, however, we currently have a partnership with Microsoft Azure.

The initial setup of Amazon EBS is easy, depending upon the requirement.

The main challenge with using Amazon EBS relates to cost management. Managing high performance and IOPS volumes can be costly.

Currently, my company is partnered with Microsoft Azure and we are using various Azure services.

I would recommend Amazon EBS to other people. I rate Amazon EBS a nine out of ten.

I primarily use Amazon EBS for my storage needs and for creating backups. It is highly compatible with other AWS services, which allows for easy data storage and retrieval.

I have utilized Amazon EBS in different ways, and it has worked very smoothly and perfectly. There have been no disruptions.

Amazon EBS offers features such as cloud migrations and different deployments, which are incredibly beneficial in moving data from on-premises to the cloud. The platform is stable and can be replicated across different availability zones and data centers.

There are no current recommendations for improvement. However, implementing more AI-based capabilities could enhance the service.

I have been working with Amazon EBS for one and a half years.

Amazon EBS is very stable. It replicates data across different availability zones and ensures data is reliably backed up and accessible.

Amazon EBS is easy to scale up or down as needed. I would rate its scalability as ten out of ten.

The AWS customer support is very cooperative, fast to reply, and solutions-oriented. They are highly recommended.

Positive

The initial setup of Amazon EBS was very easy. Even for beginners, the setup is seamless and easy to perform.

Amazon EBS is a cost-efficient solution. It is very cost-effective and offers great value.

I highly recommend Amazon EBS for enterprises and small businesses due to its cost efficiency and ease of use. 

I rate the overall solution ten out of ten.

A use case for Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is storage when users want to have a disk attached. In cases where file services access is needed, we use EFS instead.

Based on my extensive experience with Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), the measurable benefits include superior I/O performance when hosting databases on servers.

The Snapshot functionality of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is particularly useful. When performing activities, taking snapshots serves as a first level of defense for backup purposes.

Another significant benefit of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is its superior I/O performance when hosting databases on servers.

Amazon could improve Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) by making it faster.

I have been working with Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) for five years.

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is scalable.

Amazon technical support deserves a rating of eight out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup for Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is simple and not complex.

When comparing Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) and Azure block storage, there is not any noticeable difference as both perform similarly.

I need to consider additional functions for Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) as I am not currently certain about them.

On a scale of one to ten, I rate Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) an eight.

I mainly use Amazon EBS for EC2 configuration. We use it for the EC2 purpose to store data and mount with the running EC2 instances. EBS is the backbone of the compute instances. It is not only a disk; it is the main support for running EC2 instances. Moreover, if you want to use the EBS volume in your EKS cluster, like a Kubernetes cluster, you have to use it.

In a traditional setup, if you want to add a disk to legacy systems, you need to purchase, find the hardware vendor, and insert it, which is a lengthy procedure. 

With Amazon EBS, if you want to add an additional disk to an EC2 instance, you can simply attach an EBS volume by clicking through a few options, and it's done.

There is room for improvement in AWS support. They have technically strong people. However, sometimes there is a lag in providing technical solutions to customers.

I have been using Amazon EBS since approximately 2019 or 2018.

Based on stability, I would rate EBS more than nine, possibly 9.5 out of ten.

For scalability, I would also rate it at 9.5 out of ten. It is amazing.

AWS support is good, but there is space for improvement. They follow the SLA, but the technical solution responses have room for enhancement.

Neutral

The initial setup of Amazon EBS is straightforward. Even if you want to add an additional disk after deployment, you can do it. If you wish to expand the volume, it is also possible.

Amazon EBS is the backbone of running instances, and most people are aware of using it. However, to cut costs, you must choose the right size when provisioning. 

Ensure your data's security by selecting the right encryption keys, AWS region, and availability zone to avoid duplicate work. Additionally, if your image is from the marketplace, read the instructions given by third-party vendors. If you use a global encryption key for EBS volume, ensure approval from your organization for global KMS key or EBS encryption key for your account.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I use the solution in my company to store Amazon EC2 instances.

There are no specific features of the product that I like the most since it is a tool that serves as a block storage in my company.

I feel that there are some concerns when it comes to the accessibility area of the product where improvements are required. The product should be accessible for any kind of main service. For better accessibility, users can choose Amazon NFS over Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store). Amazon NFS can be used for multiple services. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) can be used for a single point of service.

I have been using Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) for four to five years. I am a customer of Amazon.

The product can handle an increase in the load of user data. The product can handle an increase in demand.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The product's initial setup phase was easy to manage.

The time required to declare the solution depends on the user's chosen services.

The product offers different pricing models. The pricing models may be for general purposes, such as Amazon EBS Provisioned IOPS Volume or Amazon EBS Cold HDD Volumes. The volume size can be considered while checking the costs attached to the product. Coming to the general purpose, our company checks for bandwidth performance since it will be used for a wide range of workloads. Amazon EBS Provisioned IOPS Volume will be for intensive workloads.

I have integrated Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) with Amazon EC2. Amazon EC2 deals with instances, but Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is required to deal with the storage part.

I utilize the product for data-intensive applications and to deal with Amazon EC2 instances, and the company has connected it with Amazon EBS volumes. Once any instances are created with the help of Amazon EC2, our company has to attach them to Amazon EBS volumes, which we can use to create Amazon EBS snapshots.

The scalability of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) has affected our company's storage solutions since it provides auto-scaling feature recording. With the tool's auto-scaling feature, our company has to create EC2 storage and instances. The product allows our company to extend its capacity by at least 70 percent, and if it needs to be increased beyond that, then it will automatically create a new service and attach it to a new Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) service.

Speaking about the durability and snapshot capabilities, with the auto-scaling features provided by the product, our company can add Amazon EC2 instances as a part of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store).

I recommend some services, like Amazon RDS, which allows users to use Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) volumes. With Amazon S3, users can use Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) volumes.

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) can be used in multiple regions with multiple integrations or two-way communications. The product also offers customization options.

My company uses multiple tools and services from AWS. My company manages and creates different services. Our organization deploys applications and manages clusters on Amazon's services. If our company's customers face issues, we have to offer help.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it since it helps encrypt data. Users can also choose the encryption volume with the help of the product. AWS Key Management Service is available for encryption purposes.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We keep the data generated by the applications in the solution. We also store application logs. It is very easy to integrate the tool with the EC2 instance. I use the AWS console to integrate the products. Sometimes, I use CLI.

When the data is created, we save it in EBS. It's data-intensive, and sometimes, the data is very important. To avoid losing the data, we create a snapshot of the volumes every hour or once every two hours. We select volumes like gp2 and gp3 based on our requirements. EBS is customizable. We can select any volume depending on speed and size. The integration is very easy. We can mount EBS within seconds. We can also delete or unmount it.

It also provides API support. The durability and snapshot capabilities are good. The way they are designed is very good. We rarely find our EBS corrupted. It's very robust and easy to use. I never faced any issues with durability. The maximum size is 1000 GB. The solution is available whenever we need it.

The features could be improved.

I have been using the solution for five to seven years.

I rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability a ten out of ten.

We need to pay for support.

Negative

Integrating EBS into EC2 is very easy. Even people who are not from technical backgrounds can do it.

The solution is quite costly. There was an instance when we were not using 50 volumes. They were available and were costing us even though we were not using them. We ran a script to delete them. It's better to keep a watch on it and delete it whenever it is not needed. AWS has a pay-as-you-go model.

We have been using the solution since we have deployed our applications on AWS. If we track 100 GB of EBS volume, we know that the total data collected from the application will not cross 100 GB. Sometimes, we use Amazon S3 for object storage. If there is any transit data, we store it directly in S3. Our EBS volumes are free most of the time.

Logs mostly fill the EBS volumes quickly. We have an instance to monitor our Kubernetes cluster, and it fills the EBS volume very quickly. So, we have written a script to delete the older logs. I will recommend the solution to others. Anyone using EC2 must use EBS by default. It's very easy to use and integrate. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I use Amazon EC2 instances, AWS Lambda, API Gateway, and EBS for storing data. EBS is primarily associated with Amazon EC2 instances.

The main advantage is the ability to scale up and scale down easily without any downtime. Amazon EBS allows seamless changes to the instance type without affecting application availability. 

It also supports encryption by default for added security.

I do not have anything in mind for improvement at the moment.

I have been using Amazon EBS for around eight years.

Amazon EBS is stable and easy to use. Detaching and attaching volumes are very straightforward, contributing to the overall stability.

Amazon EBS provides effective scalability with the ability to modify volume size easily and have it reflect instantly.

Accessing technical support requires a paid subscription plan. Once subscribed, the support team is very responsive, connecting remotely to assist with troubleshooting.

Positive

Amazon EBS is priced based on usage, and it is fairly priced. Users are charged only for the data used, not for the allocated volume.

I recommend using EBS because of its flexibility with volumes. Instead of instance-based storage, EBS is more efficient.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.