No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Aparna Kumari - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Scientist at HSBC
Real User
Oct 21, 2023
User-friendly and stable data management ensuring data quality and maintaining data governance standards
Pros and Cons
  • "The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."
  • "I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use it for data-related tasks, focusing on assessing and enhancing the quality and integrity of our data. Our typical dataset size falls within the range of one to five gigabytes. We employ the platform for tasks such as data mapping and data transformation.

How has it helped my organization?

One of the most significant advantages is the ease of creating tables and hierarchies. Unlike SQL, where you need to write complex statements, in Ataccama ONE, you can simply copy and paste data from your documents and quickly generate tables with minimal effort. I found it to be highly deployable, making it a user-friendly choice for our project.

What is most valuable?

The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward. Even for someone entirely new to the tool, it's remarkably easy to grasp. It comes with documentation, which is beneficial.

What needs improvement?

It is not very versatile when it comes to integrating with Unix and other applications. I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres. I would also recommend enhancing the documentation with more comprehensive information that covers the latest features and developments.

Buyer's Guide
Ataccama ONE Platform
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Ataccama ONE Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with it for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is quite stable, with no significant issues or frequent changes.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It would be beneficial to see it evolve towards cloud-based scalability, where it can efficiently handle larger volumes of data, possibly exceeding a terabyte. Currently it is optimized for managing relatively small datasets.

How are customer service and support?

The experience with their support team has been satisfactory. Whenever we reached out to them with inquiries or issues, they were quite responsive. We would submit tickets in the support system, and typically, by the end of the day, we received their prompt responses, which was impressive in terms of turnaround time. I would rate it nine out of ten.

What about the implementation team?

Our deployment approach was relatively straightforward. We created two files and placed them in a designated path, and that constituted the deployment process. It was a simplified and flexible process, especially when compared to other modules and their deployment procedures. If there is a single code change, it can be completed within a few hours. However, when multiple code changes are involved, it can take one to two days, depending on the complexity of the changes and the need to coordinate with other teams.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Informatica and Ab Initio.

What other advice do I have?

I would like to emphasize that Ataccama ONE is an excellent tool, especially for those who are new to data management and may not be proficient in coding or SQL. It offers an easy-to-use platform with extensive documentation. It serves as a great starting point for understanding data architecture in a simplified manner. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Ashwani Tyagi - PeerSpot reviewer
Data analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Oct 15, 2023
Has an efficient data profiling feature and a simple setup process
Pros and Cons
  • "The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."
  • "It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

What is our primary use case?

We are using the product for data quality. We can connect it with data sources, such as Microsoft SQL, Oracle, Teradata, and local systems, including shared drives, to check data quality and profiling. We can also use it to write rule logic as well.

What is most valuable?

The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check. To get data quality, we need to collect all data. We have data everywhere, and their initial goal in modern times is to get data quality. We normally ingest all the metadata from the data into Collibra. We need to manually download the report from Collibra and load it into Ataccama. We are reducing these manual steps using the integrators and putting Ataccama and Collibra together. Ataccama can also perform the EDR.

What needs improvement?

It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data. We have to raise a ticket to Ataccama's team.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the Ataccama ONE Platform for two years. We are a customer of Ataccama.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is stable. I rate its stability an eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Ataccama has different documents on their side. I rate the product’s scalability an eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

Our IT security team manages technical issues.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple. We are better equipped to handle that connection type when we connect very different data tools.

What other advice do I have?

We worked with stakeholders to clean and profile the data so they could easily analyze it. We have some unrestricted data formats, such as XML or JSON. To redeliver this data, we need to create a plan. It is similar to the previous process, but we cannot perform data quality checks on this type of data. We need to create the data in XML Insight to use data quality checks. There are many functions inside the Ataccama, such as fixing grid files. We can read dispute finance data in the web app and generate reports. Currently, we need to create the component or dispute. Then, the data comes into the room in a stable format, and we can easily upload it to change the data quality.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Ataccama ONE Platform
October 2026
Learn what your peers think about Ataccama ONE Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Chuha Adequatov - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Regulatory Reference Data Management Division at Altynalmas JSC
Real User
Apr 5, 2022
Is easy to deploy and is free, but marketing strategies need improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "It is also easy to deploy."
  • "The software itself is quite good and met all my requirements."
  • "They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

What is our primary use case?

We use Ataccama DQ Analyzer to analyze data migration from one source to another. We use it to clean up the data.

What is most valuable?

I like that there is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it free.

It is also easy to deploy.

What needs improvement?

They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working. For example, when I reached out to Ataccama and asked if they wanted to participate in our sourcing event, their response was that they do not do that.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using it for about three months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a really stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable. I have used it for master data and also for another one that was larger.

How was the initial setup?

It is easy to deploy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free.

What other advice do I have?

The software itself is quite good and met all my requirements. However, I would rate it at seven on a scale from one to ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user830580 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Mar 15, 2018
Helps us understand data quality, from multiple sources, in layman's terms
Pros and Cons
  • "The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."
  • "By understanding the existing data from various source systems, we were able to arrive at the requirements for a data quality plan, and create a separate plan to improve the data quality."
  • "Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

What is our primary use case?

DQA is a data profiler.

How has it helped my organization?

My organization's requirement was to build a centralized, quality data repository by accumulating client data from various source systems. This tool helped in understanding the quality of the data available in each system. By understanding the existing data from various source systems, we were able to arrive at the requirements for a data quality plan, and create a separate plan to improve the data quality.

What is most valuable?

The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms.

What needs improvement?

Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What other advice do I have?

DQA is similar to Ataccama ONE. One difference is that DQA is an IDE-based data profiler. The IDE is built on Eclipse. All you have to do is import the data and set up the metadata of that data, write the data and select profile. This gives you the complete profile of the data, detailing the data quality and consistency.

I would rate it an eight out of 10. It has most of the necessary features needed, and almost all features available in a competitor's product. However, there is scope for improvement.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Senior Architect at a construction company with 51-200 employees
Vendor
Sep 11, 2014
It is very fast but could be faster if it had the possibility to change the batch size.
Pros and Cons
  • "I was able to ascertain that elements of information was or was not of value to the migration process, thus saving money in the migration project."
  • "The non-free version has much more capabilities and I did not have the occasion to try it."

What is most valuable?

Easy to configure, fun and easy to use.

How has it helped my organization?

I was able to ascertain that elements of information was or was not of value to the migration process. Thus savings money in the migration project.

What needs improvement?

It is a free product. I would like to be able to control the batch size i.e. number of records it processes at a time when it generates its report. The non-free version has much more capabilities and I did not have the occasion to try it.

For how long have I used the solution?

Since 2009

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Nope. Very easy and straight forward.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is very fast but could be faster if it had the possibility to change the batch size. See my room for improvement comments above.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service: Not rated because we never have been a registered user.Technical Support: Ataccama has a user forum where personal from Ataccama answered very quickly for the few questions we asked.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No. But I did try Talend DQ Profiler and it sucks compared to DQ Analyzer.

How was the initial setup?

Very easy setup.

What about the implementation team?

In-house.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes. But this solution was cost effective (free) for what we needed to do.

What other advice do I have?

Ataccama has videos to help you get started. Its product is easy to explore without fear of breaking anything.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user147567 - PeerSpot reviewer
FEA Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 51-200 employees
Vendor
Aug 26, 2014
For small databases, it is fast and convenient.
Pros and Cons
  • "For small databases, it is fast and convenient."
  • "I remember one disadvantage, I couldn't load large database to Ataccama DQ Analyzer. One time I had one single database close to 180G which was not able to load to Ataccama DQ Analyzer, and had to use another solution."

Valuable Features:

Profiling and cleansing

Improvements to My Organization:

I was running a project for a client, they had a large database for 20+ years. I needed Ataccama DQ Analyzer to find missing data, wrong pattern data, miss placing data, typos, and so on.

Room for Improvement:

I remember one disadvantage, I couldn't load large database to Ataccama DQ Analyzer. One time I had one single database close to 180G which was not able to load to Ataccama DQ Analyzer, and had to use another solution.

Use of Solution:

I used Ataccama DQ Analyzer for 2 years.

Deployment Issues:

No

Stability Issues:

No

Scalability Issues:

No

Initial Setup:

Straightforward. Very easy to follow.

Cost and Licensing Advice:

Free

Other Solutions Considered:

No, Ataccama DQ Analyzer was the first one I tried.

Other Advice:

For small databases, it is fast and convenient.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Ataccama ONE Platform Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Ataccama ONE Platform Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.