AWS Lambda Reviews

We are using the latest version.

We use the solution for the building of small applications.

The solution offers good performance. It is a good tool for developers. 

I wish to see better execution time in the next release. 

I believe we have been using AWS Lambda for around a year.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is sufficiently scalable. 

We have plans to increase its usage. 

I am satisfied with Amazon tech support. 

The initial setup is fine. 

Its duration varies with the application that one is deploying. 

The installation can be accomplished on one's own. 

The solution is pay as you go.

To the best of my knowledge, we have been using the solution from the get go. 

There are 100 end users making use of the solution in our organization. 

I would recommend the solution to others.

The solution is recommended for those who have event-based applications. 

I rate Lambda AWS as a nine-point-five out of ten. 

We use it for serverless functions.

The programming language and the integration with other AWS services are the most valuable features.

Its performance can be improved. There should also be more dynamic security permissions.

I have been using this solution since I joined this company, which was two years ago.

It is very stable.

It is very scalable.

There are no issues. So far, I am completely satisfied with their technical support.

It was easy.

I did it myself.

We didn't evaluate other options because it was a requirement for the project.

I would advise others to predefine the main model and ensure their CI/CD pipeline.

I am satisfied with Lambda, and I would recommend it to others. I would rate it an eight out of 10.

My primary use case for this solution is usually for event-driven architecture. Since it's AWS, it's cloud-based. 

I have found all of the features valuable. It's an easy and cheap solution. 

AWS Lambda could be improved by increasing the size of the payload. Also, sometimes Lambda doesn't implement well for bigger solutions. 

I have been using this solution for three years. 

This solution is stable. 

I would rate customer support a nine out of ten. I have made three or four service requests and those were all resolved within 24 hours. 

I didn't use a different solution before implementing Lambda. 

The installation is straightforward. There isn't really anything you need to do. If you know exactly what you want, it can be done in five minutes. 

I implemented this solution myself. 

I pay for a monthly license. The licensing options will depend on the users. There's a monthly option and a yearly option. 

Lambda is a good and cheap solution and I would recommend it to those without a huge payload. There are around twenty or thirty people using Lambda in my organization. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

In respect of the function and template, I find the solution to be easy to use, as it obviates the need to do the same thing repeatedly. 

The automation with other Amazon products could be better. 

As the solution is on-cloud, it is already scalable. 

There is another local team with whom we work when it comes to the need for technical support. 

The installation and configuration of the solution is straightforward. 

The length of the deployment can vary with the solution. It took us half a day but, when accounting for the configurations and connectivity, all told, this can take about one or two days. 

The cloud team consists of 47 people. 

The solution is deployed on-cloud. 

In the past year, we have around 75 to 80 Lambda functions. 

The solution provides basic security standards.

I would recommend the solution to others. 

I rate AWS Lambda as a five to six out of ten. 

We use AWS Lambda to automatically manages some compute resources.

It triggers and screens some of my services.

It is easy to use.

I like the way it manages.

I would like to see more integration with other platforms.

I have been using AWS Lambda for a few years.

We are not using the latest version.

AWS Lambda is a stable solution.

You do not have to scale AWS Lambda, it automatically scales for you.

AWS Lambda is used on a daily basis.

We only have a few people who used this solution. I have two teams.

We have a dedicated manager.

My experience with support so far has been good.

It doesn't require any installation at all.

AWS Lambda is inexpensive.

I am very happy with this solution. I would recommend it to others who are interested in it.

I would rate AWS Lambda an eight out of ten.

We use AWS Lambda for several things. We are using it, for instance, to do authentication of information from HTTP sites. We use it for alerting when monitoring the direct database infrastructure, and we use it for API transformation.

It provides us with everything that we need.

We have been using AWS Lambda for two or three years.

We don't have a problem with the stability of AWS Lambda. It's very stable.

It is a scalable solution.

We have many users, but it is based on volume and the number of transactions, not by the number of users.

We have no issues with the technical support.

We use a number of AWS services.

The installation is straightforward. 

We have scripted most of the things. There was no problem with the installation.

We completed the installation ourselves.

The price in general could always be better.

The fees are volume-based.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate AWS Lambda a nine out of ten.

Lambda can be used for automating AWS resources. 

It can also be used for automation outside of the cloud and for serverless applications. With Lambda, you can apply the code directly. 

The stability of the solution is very good, as is the performance.

It's a brilliant Amazon service that provides for many use cases. It's quite flexible.

The product has been very easy to use. All you have to do is configure a Lambda function and then deploy your code directly there and then you can invoke it in different ways. 

It is easy to configure.

The initial setup is very straightforward. 

Technical support has been great in general.

It would be ideal if we could use the solution across different platforms.

The integration could be better.

I've been using the solution for three years at this point. 

The solution is stable and the performance is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

We have multiple applications. Most of our applications are Lambda-based, I would say there are around a hundred at this point.

The technical support on offer is brilliant. There shouldn't be any concern with contacting them. they are helpful and responsive. We are satisfied with the level of service on offer from them.

We have found that the solution is easy to install. You just have to do it through the UI and you can easily configure it and deploy it directly.

For deployment, et cetera, we just need one cloud ops engineer per day.

I was able to handle the implementation myself. I did not need the assistance of any consultants or integrators. Individual users should be okay if they want to install it themselves. 

We don't need to worry about monthly or yearly licenses. 

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I've been very pleased with its capabilities in general.

I would recommend the solution to other users and companies. 

We have two or three applications that are hosted with Lambda. Being on cloud, the solution has its own advantages with good management of resources. You can spin up anything instantly without any investment and disaster recovery or HA is taken care of by the service itself. 

I believe Lambda security needs to be improved.  

I've been using this solution for one year. 

The solution is stable. 

I'm satisfied with the technical support, they respond quickly. 

The initial setup was straightforward and we currently have four engineers working on the product. 

Licensing is on a monthly subscription model and is usage-based. 

I rate the solution nine out of 10. 

The product is primarily used to deploy code and provision a software solution to your clients when they don't have the time. You don't have to pay for the servers and the uptime.

It is my preferred product, as it provides me with source code within the solution.

It's a great product due to the fact that you don't have to pay for the servers and the uptime.

The solution is very stable.

The product scales well. 

The solution can be free to use.

The product could make the process of integration easier. 

The could be more integration testing. The internal is great with Lambda, however, I have to make sure I have done my tests on a related machine before deploying.

I've been using the solution for three years. I haven't used it for too long just yet.

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It does not crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The solution scales very well. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

Its scalability is always based on how much software there is. It's actually virtually building out. The API can scale up automatically. And if the API calls go down, then the system slows in real-time.

All my clients are using the product. All the projects I push to my clients are on Lambda.

I haven't dealt with technical support directly. Therefore, I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are in general. I don't have experience with them on that personal level. 

There is no setup process to deal with as the entire solution is on the cloud. It's very easy.

If you need to deploy it to a license, the first server you use you need to pay for a license. If you're going to open-source, there are no licenses required.

I'm just a customer and have clients on the solution.

I've had a very good experience with the product. I would rate it at a ten out of ten.

I would recommend the product to all developers.

The primary use case is processing data. We use the pipeline multiple places to process the data. Whatever JSON files we get, we have to standardize, enrich, and also format to the application.

The most valuable feature is that it's serverless. Therefore, server configuration is not required, and we can run it directly anywhere. We can write Java code or Python code in that.

The initial setup is straightforward as well.

AWS Lambda is good for short-term automation processes.

If you want to run processing data, which takes less than 15 minutes, then you can use Lambda. However, if it is a specific ETL process or a long-term one, then AWS Lambda is not a good option.

The longer Lambda runs, the higher is the cost incurred because the cost is based on runtime.

At times, it hard to know when Lambda should be used and when it should not. So in the future, if there are serverless extensions, it would be fine.

I've been working with AWS Lambda for six to seven months.

The initial setup of AWS Lambda is straightforward.

The cost of AWS Lambda is based on runtime.

It's a good product, and we use Lambda for short run processes, for example, processing a file from the landing zone. Suppose FTP or SFTP has put a file in one landing area, and we have to push a file to the S3 bucket. We would not need to do any writing, shell scripting, or Linux coding, etc. In general, with Lambda you can get the Python coder or Java code.

So, professionals can easily perform these tasks within a short time. This will help with agile processes and sprints. My advice is that AWS Lambda is a good service for short-term automation processes.

I would rate AWS Lambda at eight on a scale from one to ten.