Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Lambda vs Apache Spark comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark
Ranking in Compute Service
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (1st), Java Frameworks (2nd)
AWS Lambda
Ranking in Compute Service
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Apache Spark is 11.2%, up from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Lambda is 21.0%, down from 23.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compute Service
 

Featured Reviews

Ilya Afanasyev - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well
We use batch processing. It works well with our formats and file versions. There's a lot of functionality. In our pipeline each hour, we make a copy of data from MongoDB, of the changes from MongoDB to some specific file. Each time pipeline copied all of the data, it would do it each time without changes to all of the tables. Tables have a lot of data, and in the last MongoDB version, there is a possibility to read only changed data. This reduced the cost and configuration of the cluster, and we saved about $150,000. The solution is scalable. It's a stable product.
Wai L Lin O - PeerSpot reviewer
A serverless solution with easy integration features
We use AWS Lambda because it provides a solution for our needs without requiring us to manage our infrastructure. With the tool, we only pay for the resources we use. Additionally, it is straightforward to implement and integrates with other services like API Gateway. The tool's serverless nature has had the most significant impact on our workflow. I find it particularly attractive because it eliminates the need for managing servers. In my previous experience, managing upgrades and updates was quite challenging. The solution's integration process with other AWS services was relatively easy. We primarily use AWS services such as EventBridge for scheduling processes and log management.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Spark helps us reduce startup time for our customers and gives a very high ROI in the medium term."
"It's easy to prepare parallelism in Spark, run the solution with specific parameters, and get good performance."
"The data processing framework is good."
"The features we find most valuable are the machine learning, data learning, and Spark Analytics."
"DataFrame: Spark SQL gives the leverage to create applications more easily and with less coding effort."
"The product is useful for analytics."
"Features include machine learning, real time streaming, and data processing."
"The fault tolerant feature is provided."
"What I like most about AWS Lambda is that it's very easy to deploy."
"I like the pay-for-what-you-use feature. This is the main reason why we use AWS Lambda. I don't have to manage servers; I just have to configure Lambda and expose it to an API gateway."
"The automation feature is valuable."
"This product is easy to use."
"We are building a Twitter-like application in the boot camp. I have used Lamda for the integration of the post-confirmation page in the application. This will help you get your one-time password via mail. You can log in with the help of a post-confirmation page. We didn’t want to setup an instance specifically for confirmation. We used the Lambda function so that it goes back to sleep after pushing up."
"The solution integrates well with API gateways and S3 events via its AWS ecosystem."
"The main features of this solution are the ability to integrate multiple AWS applications or external applications very quickly and organize all of them. Additionally, it is easy to use and you can run various programming languages, such as Python, Go, and Java."
"They have the built-in IDE, so everything happens without integration issues."
 

Cons

"The Spark solution could improve in scheduling tasks and managing dependencies."
"I would like to see integration with data science platforms to optimize the processing capability for these tasks."
"Apache Spark could improve the connectors that it supports. There are a lot of open-source databases in the market. For example, cloud databases, such as Redshift, Snowflake, and Synapse. Apache Spark should have connectors present to connect to these databases. There are a lot of workarounds required to connect to those databases, but it should have inbuilt connectors."
"They could improve the issues related to programming language for the platform."
"Apache Spark provides very good performance The tuning phase is still tricky."
"We use big data manager but we cannot use it as conditional data so whenever we're trying to fetch the data, it takes a bit of time."
"When you are working with large, complex tasks, the garbage collection process is slow and affects performance."
"At times during the deployment process, the tool goes down, making it look less robust. To take care of the issues in the deployment process, users need to do manual interventions occasionally."
"AWS Lambda could improve by having no-code or low-code options because currently, you need to be able to write code well to use it."
"The product could make the process of integration easier."
"It could be cheaper."
"We need to invest time in learning the tool's language variant. We have encountered instances of downtime as well."
"Lamba functions have cold-starts that can cause some delay."
"Its performance can be improved. There should also be more dynamic security permissions."
"The product needs some updating as far as ease-of-customization and configuration opportunities to work with solutions outside of the cloud."
"Lambda would benefit from a debugging feature as well."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
"Apache Spark is an open-source tool."
"They provide an open-source license for the on-premise version."
"The product is expensive, considering the setup."
"The solution is affordable and there are no additional licensing costs."
"Considering the product version used in my company, I feel that the tool is not costly since the product is available for free."
"Apache Spark is an open-source solution, and there is no cost involved in deploying the solution on-premises."
"I did not pay anything when using the tool on cloud services, but I had to pay on the compute side. The tool is not expensive compared with the benefits it offers. I rate the price as an eight out of ten."
"The fees are volume-based."
"Lambda is a good and cheap solution and I would recommend it to those without a huge payload."
"Its pricing is on the higher side."
"For licensing, we pay a yearly subscription."
"The cost is based on runtime."
"AWS Lambda's cloud version isn't expensive, and I'd rate its pricing as five out of five."
"The pricing varies based on the specific solution you're implementing, and in comparison to the value it provides, the overall cost is reasonable."
"It computes by the cycle, and it's very cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Educational Organization
69%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
4%
Manufacturing Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Spark?
We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Spark?
Compared to other solutions like Doc DB, Spark is more costly due to the need for extensive infrastructure. It requires significant investment in infrastructure, which can be expensive. While cloud...
What needs improvement with Apache Spark?
The Spark solution could improve in scheduling tasks and managing dependencies. Spark alone cannot handle sequential tasks, requiring environments like Airflow scheduler or scripts. For instance, o...
Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?
AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...
What do you like most about AWS Lambda?
The tool scales automatically based on the number of incoming requests.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lambda?
AWS Lambda is cheaper compared to running an instance continuously. You only pay for what you use, making it cost-effective.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
Netflix
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lambda vs. Apache Spark and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.