The ability to scale JMeter tests easily. This isn't possible with traditional load testing approaches.
Principal Consultant - Business Analysis / Project Management / Account Management at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
A cost effective way to scale our existing JMeter load tests.
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
BlazeMeter allows us to easily run our existing load testing solutions at massive scale.
All of our consultants can use BlazeMeter. Traditionally our tests were run in JMeter and this was limited to technical users. BlazeMeter allows the use of the same tests but in a more user-friendly environment where all of our consultants can run the tests and access the results.
BlazeMeter is a cost effective way to scale our existing JMeter load tests.
What needs improvement?
Running of multi-tests could be improved to make it easier to create them. Apart from that nothing else springs to mind.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The application has been stable in most of our tests to date. We experience the odd bug, but BlazeMeter are quick to resolve any issues.
Buyer's Guide
BlazeMeter
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about BlazeMeter. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have tested up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent users and the system performed well.
How are customer service and support?
Easy to use and effective.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup is very easy.
What other advice do I have?
When selecting a vendor, I look at ease of use, support, product maturity, and their partner model.
BlazeMeter is a great solution to run your existing tests. You will need detailed knowledge of JMeter to get the most out of your testing and BlazeMeter offer comprehensive training if you are new to this.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Chief Technology Officer at a non-profit with 51-200 employees
We like the ability to run a test repeatedly and that it is easy to make small changes to the test.
What is most valuable?
- Easy to make small changes to the test without reconfiguration, so we could step increases in load and find the limits without risk in breaking the test scripts. Consistent testing allows for confidence in the results and ease of use by the team.
- Integration with New Relic - provides insight as to why the test had the results and how we can improve them. New Relic was already in our tool belt, so it was nice to not need to change to an unfamiliar tool.
How has it helped my organization?
Provided an easy to use tool to measure the performance of our most critical business application, along with the expertise of BlazeMeter to properly generate the test case.
It has allowed us to test the impact of vendor updates to their software on the performance of the web component, which we are now doing as updates get released (6 month release cycle, so only one retest thus far).
System Administrators are performing the testing, as the software isn't ours and we don't presently develop our own software this was a new need and we don't have anything to compare to other than anecdotal evidence from users. We were able to compare results post-testing by comparing Google Analytics data and found that the improvements we put into place as result of the testing did have positive effect on both pageload and generation timings along with improving the overall conversion rate for the tool as well.
What needs improvement?
It's a rather expensive tool for running just a few tests — which is our primary use case, if there was a pricing structure that met our use case price wouldn’t be of concern. Worth noting is that we requested they donate our use of the tool — and they did donate the tool for our use — so it did not cost us anything (which we are very thankful for as a nonprofit).
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We encountered no stability issues in using it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We encountered no scalability issues, though we were testing at relatively low volumes.
How are customer service and technical support?
Any questions we had were addressed promptly by knowledgeable individuals.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We wanted a solution that was easy to interpret and wouldn't require custom tooling beyond building the test. JMeter was the right tool for the job, and BlazeMeter's expertise and easy to use interface allowed us to readily view and compare results without needing to build a custom workflow.
How was the initial setup?
Creating the JMeter test case required some time on our part, partially due to JMeter not supporting JavaScript and the application we were testing requires JavaScript support. We were able to create a test to work around that limitation, but that's more due to BlazeMeter utilizing JMeter than it being a limitation of BlazeMeter as a platform.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Cost is critical as a non-profit, and they donated our access as noted prior. Functionality is also critical — and they had the function we needed, were easy to configure, and integrated with New Relic which saved us a lot of time.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The alternative was to use Open Source tools to analyze the results, this solution was selected as we felt it would be faster and easier than rolling a custom solution which just wasn't warranted for how simple our situation is.
What other advice do I have?
It's free and easy to sign up and try, so give it a whirl and see if it meets your requirements. We found it met ours and more, helping us gain confidence from our customers and solve a nagging problem in the performance of a third-party application.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free BlazeMeter Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2026
Product Categories
Performance Testing Tools Functional Testing Tools Load Testing Tools API Testing Tools Test Automation ToolsPopular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca
OpenText Functional Testing
Katalon Studio
Apache JMeter
BrowserStack
SmartBear TestComplete
Tricentis NeoLoad
Sauce Labs
Perfecto
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
Ranorex Studio
Selenium HQ
Worksoft Certify
UiPath Test Cloud
Testim
Buyer's Guide
Download our free BlazeMeter Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
- When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
- Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?
- What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?
- What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?
- When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?
- Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?
- Specflow vs Selenium














