BlazeMeter vs BrowserStack comparison

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

5,466 Views
3,417 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BlazeMeter and BrowserStack are prominent in the testing tools category, with BlazeMeter showing a slight edge due to its cloud-based scalability and flexible integration capabilities.

Features: BlazeMeter provides powerful load testing, allowing global scaling of JMeter tests and New Relic integration for comprehensive insights. It offers a robust cloud-based load generation, supporting high user loads, and integrates seamlessly with various tools, offering flexible contract options. BrowserStack excels in manual and automated testing across multiple platforms and devices, offering local and diverse browser testing capabilities to ensure geolocation and cross-browser functionality.

Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could bolster its reporting features, server provisioning, and APM tool integration. Enhancements in data-driven testing support and test data management are also necessary. BrowserStack faces connectivity stability issues and could improve device integrations and testing frameworks. Pricing is a concern for both, with BlazeMeter being slightly expensive for smaller users and BrowserStack noted for its high costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter offers various cloud deployment options, praised for its responsive and knowledgeable support. Regular customer interactions for feedback and issue resolution are highly regarded. BrowserStack supports multiple cloud deployment models with generally positive user feedback on its ease of use, though there is room for improvement in customer service, with occasional slow responses and better document navigation needed.

Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter presents a range of pricing models, including custom contracts, though it is deemed expensive by some. Its ROI benefits come from reduced infrastructure costs and improved productivity. BrowserStack, while expensive, is more affordable relative to some competitors when scaled to larger teams, with cost-effectiveness stemming from replacing physical devices with virtual equivalents, reducing overall expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. BrowserStack Report (Updated: June 2025).

BlazeMeter vs. BrowserStack

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (2nd), Load Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (6th)

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.7%, down from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations."

"It is a stable solution. When we compare BlazeMeter with other tools in the market, I can say that the solution's overall performance has also been very good in our company."

"It supports any number of features and has a lot of tutorials."

"BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool."

"For me, the best part is that we can graphically see the test result at runtime. It helps us understand the behavior of the application during all stages of the test."

"With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing."

"In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally."

"I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."

"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."

"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

"I like that it offers full device capability."

"Maintenance of the solution is easy."

More BrowserStack pros

Cons

"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."

"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."

"BlazeMeter has room for improvement in terms of its integration with GitLab, particularly in the context of CI/CD processes. While it has multiple integrations available, the level of integration with GitLab may need further enhancements. It is known to work well with Git and Jenkins, although the extent of compatibility with GitLab is uncertain."

"The reporting capabilities could be improved."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"BlazeMeter does not provide integration with the Aternity tool."

"The product currently doesn't allow users to run parallel thread groups, making it an area that should be considered for improvement."

"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."

More BlazeMeter cons

"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."

"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."

"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."

"The solution is slow."

"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."

"We are struggling to do local testing."

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

"BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."

More BrowserStack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"It is an averagely priced product."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"The price is fine."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Comparisons

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs BlazeMeter

Compared 3% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 35% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 24% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Product Reports

BlazeMeter

Download BlazeMeter product report

Download BrowserStack product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

No data available

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

BlazeMeter vs. BrowserStack