Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Chronosphere vs Honeycomb Enterprise comparison

Chronosphere and Honeycomb.io are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Chronosphere is ranked #32 with an average rating of 9.0, while Honeycomb.io is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0. Chronosphere holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Honeycomb.io’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Chronosphere users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Honeycomb.io users who would recommend it.
Chronosphere
Read 1 Chronosphere review
  • 863 Views
  • 768 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Honeycomb Enterprise
Read 3 Honeycomb Enterprise reviews
  • 2,551 Views
  • 2,296 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Honeycomb Enterprise and Chronosphere are competitive observability platforms for distributed systems analysis. Honeycomb Enterprise is more efficient in pricing, while Chronosphere's rich features justify its cost.

Features: Honeycomb Enterprise offers powerful tracing, query functions, and alert capabilities, focusing on real-time performance monitoring. Chronosphere provides advanced scalability, high customization for complex environments, and greater depth, making it versatile for customization needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Honeycomb Enterprise ensures a straightforward deployment process with responsive support, facilitating smooth implementation. Chronosphere presents a slightly more complex deployment due to extensive customization options, with strong support to manage this complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Honeycomb Enterprise presents competitive pricing with a balance between cost and functionality, often leading to solid ROI. Chronosphere has a higher initial setup cost but offers significant long-term ROI due to its depth and customizability, making it suitable for organizations with a focus on scalability and feature depth.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Chronosphere
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
32nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (29th), AIOps (17th)
Honeycomb Enterprise
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
25th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Chronosphere is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Honeycomb Enterprise is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Honeycomb Enterprise1.4%
Chronosphere0.5%
Other98.1%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Arvind Pant - PeerSpot reviewer
Monitors pipelines with real-time alerts and good documentation
It isn't very easy. It's not easy for everyone. It would be much easier if there could be a simpler version, like a data number version or an SQL version. It's hard to debug if you don't know the syntax. Also, I saw the Slack alerts feature, which is pretty cool, but I cannot customize my messages on the Slack alerts. It would be great if it were possible to tag people in the alerts. At DoorDash, we have hundreds of pipelines, and if something fails, I want to tag specific people so they can start working on the issue immediately.
Read full review
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Its pattern-matching and code transformation capabilities can be adapted for mass identification and remediation of vulnerable libraries
I asked very specific questions to Mr. Pell about consideration of code security scenarios in pattern design and rules, specifically that tuned with OWASP Top 10. I believe addition of code security focus can be a value-add, though the way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions. Rather, it must be treated as a powerful supplementary tool that augments the existing code security solutions (such as Snyk or Checkmarx) in a DevSecOps or Secure DevOps environment. Anyone interested in learning more on this front or have queries, can get in touch with me for a consulting.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The alerting features are good"
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."
"The solution's most valuable features are the queries for the OpenTelemetry events and all the tracing."
"The approach offers significant benefits in terms of efficiency, consistency, and proactive security management, particularly valuable for organizations with large, distributed development teams."
 

Cons

"It's not easy for everyone."
"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."
"The way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions."
"We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Retailer
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Chronosphere?
It isn't very easy. It's not easy for everyone. It would be much easier if there could be a simpler version, like a data number version or an SQL version. It's hard to debug if you don't know the s...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Chronosphere?
I work as a data engineer, and we have many streaming pipelines. We use Chronosphere to monitor various metrics, such as how much data our pipeline is processing in each batch, the volume of incomi...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Chronosphere?
If you want to monitor pipelines and use something like Kafka or any streaming platform, Chronosphere is the best option for monitoring pipelines with real-time alerts. It is loosely coupled with y...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?
We faced some OpenTelemetry metrics lost between the communication from the service and the Honeycomb.io. I can't say if this is a Honeycomb.io issue or if there are some limitations in OpenTelemet...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?
The solution is mainly used for stack observability. It observes service behavior or any kind of failure that may be happening. The tool is also related to research. My company is working more on t...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Honeycomb.io?
We set up Honeycomb.io on all the services so that we can have all the set traces of the communication between all the services inside the company. This helps us understand where it could be failin...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Chronosphere Logo
Datadog vs Chronosphere
Compared 28% of the time
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Chronosphere Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Chronosphere
Compared 25% of the time
Grafana vs Chronosphere Logo
Grafana vs Chronosphere
Compared 19% of the time
Observe vs Chronosphere Logo
Observe vs Chronosphere
Compared 7% of the time
More Chronosphere Competitors
Sentry vs Honeycomb Enterprise Logo
Sentry vs Honeycomb Enterprise
Compared 19% of the time
Grafana vs Honeycomb Enterprise Logo
Grafana vs Honeycomb Enterprise
Compared 13% of the time
Datadog vs Honeycomb Enterprise Logo
Datadog vs Honeycomb Enterprise
Compared 7% of the time
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Honeycomb Enterprise Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs Honeycomb Enterprise
Compared 7% of the time
Azure Monitor vs Honeycomb Enterprise Logo
Azure Monitor vs Honeycomb Enterprise
Compared 4% of the time
More Honeycomb Enterprise Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
September 2025
Chronosphere reportDownload Chronosphere product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
September 2025
Honeycomb Enterprise reportDownload Honeycomb Enterprise product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Grit
 

Overview

Chronosphere provides a robust platform for managing and monitoring cloud-native applications with features like real-time observability, incident management, and capacity planning. It offers scalable, detailed observability across complex systems, an intuitive interface, and cost-efficient resource management. Users report enhanced productivity, improved collaboration, and better decision-making, bolstering operational capabilities and organizational growth.

Chronosphere

Honeycomb Enterprise is designed to optimize performance visibility, offering a robust platform for distributed system observability. It provides insights for complex data and aids in faster issue resolution, making it a valuable tool for IT professionals.

This tool is tailored for real-time data tracking and improving system performance efficiency. Enterprises benefit from its capacity to handle large-scale data, ensuring seamless operations and continuity. Honeycomb Enterprise helps teams to tackle data challenges head-on by delivering comprehensive analytics that enhance infrastructure reliability and performance metrics.

What Features Make Honeycomb Enterprise Stand Out?
  • High-Resolution Visibility: Enables detailed system monitoring to identify issues quickly.
  • Trace Analysis: Offers powerful tracing of distributed systems for in-depth insights.
  • Data Scalability: Manages extensive data sets effortlessly for better decision-making.
  • Real-Time Alerts: Provides instant alerts to preempt potential disruptions.
  • Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork with integrated tools enhancing productivity.
What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?
  • Reduced Downtime: Faster detection and resolution of issues minimizes operational interruptions.
  • Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resources leading to lower operational costs.
  • Improved Decision Making: Enhanced data analytics lead to smarter business strategies.
  • Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined processes improve team efficiency and output quality.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and technology, Honeycomb Enterprise implementations demonstrate its utility in managing complex data flows and optimizing system reliability. Businesses in these sectors leverage its capabilities to maintain high service standards and operational efficiency.

Honeycomb.io
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
September 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.