Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Palo Alto Networks and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #39. Palo Alto Networks holds a 4.9% mindshare in XDR, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Read 108 Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks reviews

14,649 Views
6,006 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

1,550 Views
698 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Cortex XDR and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 compete in the advanced threat detection and response category. ExtraHop is seen as having superior features, which makes it worth the higher cost despite Cortex XDR's cost-effectiveness.

Features: Cortex XDR is noted for its robust detection abilities, comprehensive logging, and integration with endpoint data. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is highlighted for its superior network traffic analysis, real-time threat detection, and ability to analyze encrypted traffic without decryption.

Room for Improvement: Cortex XDR users seek better third-party tool integration, enhancements in real-time visibility, and a more user-friendly dashboard. ExtraHop users would like improved cloud integration, fewer false positives, and stronger automated response capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cortex XDR is praised for its simpler deployment and responsive customer support, appealing to organizations that prioritize easy setup. ExtraHop offers more expertise and is supported by professional customer service, though its deployment is slightly more complex.

Pricing and ROI: Cortex XDR is seen as cost-effective with competitive pricing and good ROI, making it suitable for organizations with budget constraints. ExtraHop, despite a higher cost, provides high value through advanced features, appealing to businesses that prioritize comprehensive security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (7th), Ransomware Protection (2nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (2nd)

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (24th), Container Security (49th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 4.9%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	4.9%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360	0.9%
Other	94.2%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

"Palo Alto is the best security solution in the market."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"It blocks malicious files, prevents attacks, and doesn't require many updates because it is a very light application."

"The scalability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very good."

"Provides behavior-based detection which offers many benefits over signature-based detection."

"The live terminal is probably the best thing ever. It gives you the access to get straight onto any machine."

"The solution is a new generation XDR that has a lot of artificial intelligence modules."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"Their technical support is more effective and of better quality than other competitors."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

Cons

"As an improvement, I would like to see enhanced connection speeds."

"Cortex XDR should have a lightweight agent, and the agent size should not be heavy."

"It would be better if they could educate the customers more. Some sort of seminars and roadshows will help educate the customers and show what the product can do. The price could be better. It would also help if they had a team for deployment and support."

"Currently, if you use Palo Alto endpoint protection as the only solution it's very complicated to remove pre-existing threats."

"The solution needs better reports. I think they should let the customer go in and customize the reports."

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files."

"There are some default policies which sometimes affect our applications and cause them to run around. In the hotel industry, we use a different type of data versus Oracle and SQL. By default, there are some policies which stop us from running properly. Because of this, the support level is also not that strong. We have to wait to get a results."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by adding a sandbox feature to better compete with their competitors which have it."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Their professional service can be improved."

"There needs to be more support."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The price was fine."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. The ability to reverse damage caused by ransomware with minimal interruptions to...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Vectra AI vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 8% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 8% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 4% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

February 2026

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

February 2026

Free Report: Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.