Dataloader.io vs SSIS comparison

"he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."

"I find DataLoader's ability to easily integrate with external keys valuable, which is a bit more challenging with DBM."

"DataLoader is cost-effective since it is free."

"The setup is straightforward. It's very easy to install."

"The debugging capabilities are great, particularly during data flow execution. You can look into the data and see what's going on in the pipeline."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to use and it offers a flexible custom script task."

"In SSIS, the scope is not only to handle ETL challenges, but it will allow us to do so many other tasks, such as DBA activities, scripting, calling any .exe or scripts, etc."

"It is easy to set up the solution."

"The most valuable feature of SSIS is its ease of use. It is easier to use than other applications."

"Data Flows are the main component we use. These can range from a simple source to sink ETL, to many source to many sink dataflows."

"The main value of any Microsoft product is the ease of use. You can achieve more with less time. That's what's beneficial for me. With many competitors, you might need to spend more time coming up with a solution because you have to focus on taking care of the product."

"Dataloader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions. Additionally, at times it can be slow, and when integrating DBM, we find it more complex than Dataloader."

"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."

"DataLoader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions."

"We'd like more integration capabilities."

"It hangs a lot of the time."

"SSIS is not stable."

"At one point, we did have to purchase an add-on."

"Future releases should improve the data lineage, as it currently is not good."

"We have a stability problem because when something works, it works one time. The next time, it doesn't work."

"When I compare Talend and SSIS, Talend provides more features. With Talend, we can handle a large volume of data. Talend is usually used to treat a large volume of data, which makes it better than SSIS on the data side. Talend also has a very good Talend Management Console to schedule the jobs and do other things. It can also be easily connected to version control tools such as GitHub or SVN. The last time I used SSIS, it was connected through TSS for the Windows Console version. I am not sure it has been improved or not. If it is not improved, Microsoft should improve it. They should change the product to provide another console."

"It's difficult to refactor SSIS. It gets cumbersome to reuse the solution."

"The product is inexpensive and economical."

"The solution is economical. You don't have to worry about the pricing as long as you're installing both services on the same server."

"My advice is to look at what your configuration will be because most companies have their own deals with Microsoft."

"The solution is available at a lesser price than that of Informatica."

"SSIS is fairly well-priced - I would rate it at four out of five."

"Our license with SSIS is annual."

"SSIS' licensing is a little high, but it gives good value for money."

"We purchased the standard edition of SQL Server and SSIS came with it free of charge."

"Based on my experience and understanding, Talend comes out to be a little bit expensive as compared to SSIS. The average cost of having Talend with Talend Management Console is around 72K per region, which is much higher than SSIS. SSIS works very well with Microsoft technologies, and if you have Microsoft technologies, it is not really expensive to have SSIS. If you have SQL Server, SSIS is free."