DX Spectrum vs Icinga comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Icinga are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while Icinga is ranked #49. Broadcom holds a 1.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Icinga’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

DX Spectrum

Read 118 DX Spectrum reviews

16,267 Views
9,598 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

8,249 Views
5,939 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

DX Spectrum

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Spectrum, CA Spectrum, and Icinga compete in the network management and monitoring category. DX Spectrum appears to have the upper hand in scalability and comprehensive management, while Icinga stands out in automation and flexibility.

Features: DX Spectrum provides extensive network topology views, effective alerting systems, and support for diverse device types. CA Spectrum offers reliable incident and event management and deep integration with CA products. Icinga is strong in automation, features numerous plugins, and its open-source nature offers significant flexibility.

Room for Improvement: DX Spectrum could enhance its configuration simplicity and update its MIB databases, tackling Java dependency and integration complexity. Icinga would benefit from better dashboard capabilities and more structured designs, with improvements in clustering and multi-tenancy being crucial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both DX Spectrum and Icinga are primarily deployed on-premises. DX Spectrum receives average to exceptional customer service ratings, although some users note issues post-acquisition. Icinga's support is average but is bolstered by a strong community and self-support systems.

Pricing and ROI: DX Spectrum's pricing model suits larger enterprises due to its extensive features, with ROI being driven by lower operational costs. Icinga offers a low-cost entry as an open-source solution, with optional paid support, making it cost-effective for smaller organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Spectrum vs. Icinga Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Spectrum

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

17th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

118

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (7th), Network Troubleshooting (6th), DX NetOps (1st)

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Spectrum is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Spectrum	1.7%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	97.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PinchasAlbalya

Network Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitoring has become centralized and management now sees real‑time health of key network assets

The time investment required is significant, not because of difficulty but because of the need for free time to invest in it. We need to get the knowledge. We know there are many options, but we took an external vendor to install and make the customization. If we want to make others changes without paying for customization, we need to learn it deeply by ourselves. The tutorials are very complicated. They could work on that area. The tutorial part could be more simplified. I know there are many explanations, and you can get help or documents in one click on the current page in the product, but it is not very clear. If you want to do something new that you did not see from the vendor in the installation, it is not very simple. The documents are good for people that know how to operate the product well, but for new users, it is not simple.

Read full review

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Implemented with Enterprise Customers across region, it is a very strong fault management tool with extraordinary correlation and alarming."

"CA Spectrum helps our organization improve network service levels, and with Spectrum’s integrated automated fault management and fault isolation features, it helped us reduce MTTR by 50% and costs as well."

"It is an excellent product, and is probably one of the best we have seen in terms of being able to do mass configurations in the network."

"It has a highly scalable architecture that is designed to ensure accommodation of the growing network setup for our client."

"The capability of handling and monitoring with SNMP and working with the SNMP traps is much better than other products."

"It is an excellent tool for monitoring, managing event correlation, and providing integration with other tools."

"They are very good; I open up a case and hear back from them the same day, they are very knowledgeable and helpful, and if I do not have time to research something and need it fixed, I just tell them and they take care of it, even connecting remotely to do it themselves sometimes."

More DX Spectrum pros

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"The most valuable feature is one that not many are even aware of, as Icinga has a self-healing event handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted, and you can configure the handler to take action after the critical alarm without human interaction."

"I would recommend Icinga; it's an open-source solution, it's quite easy and simple to use, and checks can be run with Python code and Shell Script code."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"I would like to see better scalability, and maybe, a more intuitive user interface. "

"I would like to see them eliminate the Java console. The user interface for this is a Java applet that runs on your desktop, and it is very problematic for us in a large organization where Java is looked at as the big, bad evil thing that we should never have installed on anybody's computer because of security reasons and all that."

"DX Spectrum is stable. However, now and then there are some issues, but overall it is good."

"New areas (NFV, SDN, APM) are covered by new technologies. As such, products should have tight integration with modern data science platforms."

"I would like to see improvement in the ability of the user to configure the maintenance mode more efficiently."

"Reporting and network bandwidth monitoring features needs to be improved."

"Every versions running on Windows Server 2008 (R2) that I've worked after that (versions 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4) have had some issues either with OneClick/Spectro Server communication (hanged alarms for instance) or with global loss of SNMP communication with network devices, or DDMdb increasing indefinitely or with some unexplainable SSDB crashes."

"The price is high enough to expect an ideal solution."

More DX Spectrum cons

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"Sometimes, it is very hard to keep an overview of what's happening."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"The user interface should be improved."

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product, support, and maintenance are all expensive, which is another reason that we are switching to another solution."

"The price is very high."

"Currently, a perpetual license but some services are moving to a subscription"

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"It is very pricey. With the current trend of enterprises moving towards cheaper and more modern looking solutions like ManageEngine, SevOne, ServicePilot, and Paesller."

"The cost of some of these products are a little cost prohibitive, which is unfortunate. We have to find lower cost solutions for some of the things that we have to pull in. For the most part, CA has capabilities in pretty much everything that you would need. You just have to figure out where are you going to spend the most money for what you have to actually get done. You can do all these things but, which ones do you have to do? And that's hard to choose sometimes because you want to do them all."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It’s a great tool, but an expensive one. Learn how to use it properly."

More DX Spectrum pricing and cost advice

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The solution is cheap."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"The solution is free to use."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"It's an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Educational Organization

14%

University

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	90

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Spectrum?

The price is very, very high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Spectrum?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Spectrum?

The university purchased DX Spectrum, called ICE. DX Spectrum NAC is working for us only on Cisco 9200 switches. It is not working on any other switch like C1000 or HG or any 2960X. Even other Cisc...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs DX Spectrum

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX Spectrum

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

Kentik vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

More DX Spectrum Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum

November 2026

Download DX Spectrum product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

October 2026

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

CA Spectrum

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

DX Spectrum is a comprehensive network monitoring tool designed for scalability and accuracy. With features like fault management, topological mapping, and customizability, it addresses network issues effectively while ensuring reliable infrastructure oversight.

Known for its robust capabilities, DX Spectrum excels in fault management and network monitoring, offering features such as Global Collections and Event Correlation for precise issue detection. This scalability allows it to monitor large infrastructures efficiently using SNMP traps. Automated device discovery and seamless integrations with tools like SOI and Zabbix enhance its functionality, providing users with a streamlined experience. The interface allows for deep visibility and is supported by REST API for improved integration and automation.

What are the key features of DX Spectrum?

Fault Management: Identifies and manages network faults efficiently.
Topological Mapping: Offers a graphical representation of network topology.
Customizability: Provides extensive options to tailor the tool to specific needs.
Global Collections: Enhances issue detection across networks.
Event Correlation: Reduces false alerts by correlating network events.
Scalability: Manages large networks with SNMP traps.
Automated Discovery: Automatically identifies and integrates devices into monitoring.
REST API: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.

Why should users consider DX Spectrum in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Increases efficiency through automation and integration.
Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive network visibility and control.
Reliability: Ensures stable and reliable network operations.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with multiple external tools.
Customizability: Allows customization to meet specific monitoring needs.
Proactive Management: Supports proactive issue resolution with accurate notifications.

DX Spectrum finds extensive applications across industries for network infrastructure monitoring. It is vital in sectors where maintaining service uptime and quickly resolving network faults is critical. Organizations leverage its configuration management, alarm/event management, and integration capabilities to maintain smooth network operations, especially in environments with large and complex network infrastructures.

Broadcom

Icinga is an open-source monitoring platform known for stability and scalability. It offers object-oriented configuration, extensive plugins, and community support, providing a robust environment for monitoring servers, network devices, and infrastructure components.

Icinga facilitates intuitive setup through features like the Icinga Director, allowing for efficient configuration, automation via APIs, and flexible customization with add-ons. It supports clustering for distributed monitoring and self-healing event handlers. Integration with external tools further enhances its adaptability. While valuable, users suggest improvements in dashboard aesthetics, installation procedures, and data consistency. Automation and network discovery capabilities require further development, as does the need for built-in scripts and plugins. Icinga proves complex for beginners, with multi-tenancy support rated average and role management needing simplification.

What are Icinga's main features?

Object-Oriented Configuration: Simplifies custom plugin development and setup.
Icinga Director: Facilitates intuitive and efficient configuration management.
API Automation: Enables automated processes and seamless integrations.
Clustering Support: Allows scalable and distributed monitoring solutions.
Self-Healing Event Handlers: Automatically manage and correct system issues.
Integration and Add-Ons: Expands functionality with external tools.

Which benefits do reviews often highlight?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing monitoring needs.
Community Support: Access to a wide range of shared knowledge and solutions.
Customizability: Tailors the platform to meet specific monitoring requirements.
Stability: Delivers consistent performance and reliability.

Organizations use Icinga to monitor Linux and AIX servers along with network devices, storage, and firewalls. It supports resource surveillance, application checks, automated ticket generation, and alerting. Managed service providers use it for multi-tenancy setups, finding it essential for server health and configuration management across mixed infrastructure landscapes, leveraging plugins and SNMP Traps for proactive monitoring.

Icinga

Sample Customers

National Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, Sicredi

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

November 2026

Free Report: DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Spectrum vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Spectrum vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.