Microsoft Azure and Google Compute Engine compete in the cloud services category. Azure holds the upper hand due to its extensive global reach and a broad array of services.
Features: Microsoft Azure provides global data center availability, supports multiple languages, and offers robust application interface services. It's compatible with different frameworks and excels in hybrid cloud capabilities. Google Compute Engine focuses on flexibility and automation, key strengths being customizable VM configurations and cost-effective machine learning and storage options.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could improve its pricing model clarity, integrations, and security features. Users seek more consistent console experience and better developer tools. Google Compute Engine may enhance its usability for non-technical users, multi-region support, and UI navigation for certain tasks.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure is recognized for quick deployment in hybrid and public cloud setups, though its feature complexity is noted. Customer support tends to be inconsistent. Google Compute Engine is praised for straightforward deployment and efficient customer service for technical issues.
Pricing and ROI: Azure's pricing is flexible but can become expensive without careful management; integration with Microsoft licenses offers cost reductions. Google Compute Engine uses a competitive pay-as-you-go model, having a cost advantage for specific workloads.
The value for money is good, and Microsoft Azure has positively impacted our operational costs.
When we use Microsoft Azure, it provides enhanced security from our perspective, though I am not certain about the financial return on investment or benefits for our users as I do not have that information.
Microsoft needs to engage L3 and L2 in support when specified in service tickets.
The support from Microsoft Azure is good.
Regarding technical support from Microsoft, I find they are responsive and helpful, depending on which support package you're on.
Microsoft Azure is not just one product; it is a platform with multiple products within Microsoft Azure, and I would say it is scalable and would rate it a nine.
The scalability of Microsoft Azure is excellent for growth and adaptation, depending on company requirements.
It has different kinds of designs that allow for management and deployment in multi-zones, offering both scalable and non-scalable options.
We noticed a few critical servers went down due to a Microsoft Azure-end hardware issue.
We are now migrating clients without the zoning into mandatory multi-zone deployments, so if one zone goes down, their application and database remain live.
Microsoft Azure is quite stable, but recent outages and security issues have slightly decreased my confidence.
Recent outages and security issues are also a concern, causing a decrease in confidence, especially when partnering with third-party companies.
The administrative side is suitable for technical people, but our finance and HR super users find it less user-friendly, as they prefer drag-and-drop features to build their own solutions without contacting IT.
There is still room for improvement in terms of pricing.
Microsoft solutions might be cheaper than some services like AWS, but some solutions may be more expensive depending on the services compared.
Copilot is expensive based on recent pricing for our POC.
They have discounts and also provide promotions for a three-year reservation which comes with significant discounts on the infrastructure part.
In GCP, there's a custom configuration feature unlike AWS and Azure.
Power BI, another feature of Azure, is extremely elegant and has robust features that support forecasting using R and Python.
If Microsoft gives a report, such as a server performance report in a detailed way, which shows what is consuming more CPU, memory, and disk IO, and network utilization during a particular time, it would be helpful to visualize that information.
What is very interesting in terms of scalability is the automatic possibilities to provision some new machines to be able to absorb the number of users we have in the system.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Microsoft Azure | 14.9% |
Google Compute Engine | 1.0% |
Other | 84.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 5 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 7 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 140 |
Midsize Enterprise | 53 |
Large Enterprise | 148 |
Google Compute Engine delivers virtual machines running in Google's innovative data centers and worldwide fiber network. Compute Engine's tooling and workflow support enable scaling from single instances to global, load-balanced cloud computing.
Compute Engine's VMs boot quickly, come with persistent disk storage, and deliver consistent performance. Our virtual servers are available in many configurations including predefined sizes or the option to create Custom Machine Types optimized for your specific needs. Flexible pricing and automatic sustained use discounts make Compute Engine the leader in price/performance.
Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.
Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.
What are Azure's key features?Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.