ManageEngine Log360 vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

ManageEngine and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. ManageEngine is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.8, while Seceon is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.6% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine Log360

Read 19 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

3,377 Views
2,465 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,446 Views
1,417 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform are robust cybersecurity solutions. ManageEngine Log360 appears to have an upper hand in ease of use and deployment, while Seceon excels in advanced threat detection capabilities based on user feedback.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 users benefit from comprehensive log management, real-time alerting, and ease of deployment. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers AI-driven threat detection, automated response mechanisms, and extensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest ManageEngine Log360 could improve scalability, report customization, and customer support responsiveness. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform users seek more user-friendly documentation, enhanced integration capabilities, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 is noted for its straightforward deployment but has mixed reviews on customer support responsiveness. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is commended for smooth deployment and proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is considered cost-effective and provides good value for the investment. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is viewed as more expensive but justified by its comprehensive threat management capabilities, leading to a higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Log360 vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360 vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (25th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

43rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ManageEngine Log360	1.6%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	97.6%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility

1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox."

"The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already."

"It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications."

"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

"The most valuable features for us are the application logs monitoring and the dashboard, which provides a single-pane view of all the ongoing activities."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."

"My main objective for using ManageEngine Log360 is its powerful and real-time capabilities for managing security and other tasks efficiently."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

"The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."

"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

"The solution is stable."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"Log360 currently cannot gather information from Intune logs or cloud-integrated systems."

"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."

"The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."

"On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work."

"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."

"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system."

"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."

"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

"For future releases, integrating incident response tools and improving communication on incident reporting could be beneficial."

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth."

"The management console could use some enhancements."

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 7% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

January 2026

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

January 2026

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360 vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

February 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine Log360 vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Log360 vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine Log360 vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.