Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 18.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 316 Microsoft Azure reviews

20,523 Views
12,314 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

476 Views
476 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are significant players in cloud hosting and management. Microsoft Azure offers a cost-effective advantage with strong support, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud makes a compelling case for businesses prioritizing advanced capabilities despite its higher costs.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers seamless integration with Microsoft services, extensive global reach, and exceptional security infrastructure. On the other hand, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides enterprise-grade Kubernetes, superior container orchestration, and built-in CI/CD for efficient application development.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance its platform by simplifying its complex pricing model, improving real-time support response, and offering more comprehensive automation tools. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud might benefit from lowering its high entry costs, broadening its ecosystem to include more third-party integrations, and improving its user interface for easier management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud emphasizes an easy deployment process and robust customer service tailored for enterprise-scale deployments. Microsoft Azure provides rich tools and documentation, easing deployment for those familiar with Microsoft's ecosystem while focusing more on self-service resources.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure is known for competitive pricing structured for existing Microsoft customers, offering favorable ROI options. Conversely, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud demands a higher initial investment but promises greater returns for organizations that leverage its high-end features in complex scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

316

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 18.8%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Nicolas Chabrier

Cloud Strategy B2B leader at Sunrise UPC

Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration

The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to deploy."

"The initial setup is simple."

"It was very user-friendly when setting up the virtual machines and console. It was an easy task for my team to create virtual servers and start replications."

"In terms of scalability, it is perfect."

"The stability has been excellent."

"I come from the DBA side so for me it's the easy maintenance; backups are very easy as well."

"Storage has made remote access to files much more painless and easy."

"The technical support has been excellent."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"Technical support needs improvement."

"Azure does not handle scalability as well as its competitors. Sometimes a 10 percent increase in a server with 20 percent of CPU usage pushes the server up to 100 percent load, and you start having performance issues."

"It would be helpful if it offered more integration with other platforms."

"With a Synapse environment, we might need to switch to Databricks for better scalability."

"Azure ARM console can be a bit overwhelming at the beginning."

"Technical support is lacking right now. It needs to be better."

"Ease of use could be improved."

"When we work with Microsoft Azure we deploy it in a hybrid system. We do many operations with the open stack and I used it for APIs connected to Microsoft Azure. The reduction is because those APIs and our tools that are required to connect are not for the Microsft Azure solution. It has a bit of complexity, nothing to do with Microsoft Azure as a CSP."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"Many of the managed services are not accessible."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"Technical support could be a bit better."

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. For an SME, spending roughly 5,000 euros per month becomes interesting, indicating a significant infrastructure setup in the cloud."

"Most of the pricing from Microsoft is reasonable."

"The pricing is relatively high."

"The license is on a monthly basis."

"Its pricing model can be improved. It is variable, and if you do a simulation now, within a few months, the price can change, and your simulation would no longer be valid."

"The solution does not offer very many free services which can become expensive. We are on an annual license."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution, which could be cheaper."

"The pricing model is subscription-based and it's not an expensive solution."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is a little high in China."

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 12% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 38% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

August 2025

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

July 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?

Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.

What benefits should users expect from Azure?

Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.