Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Virtual Server vs Numecent Cloudpager comparison

Microsoft and Numecent are both solutions in the Application Virtualization category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Numecent is ranked #5. Microsoft holds a 6.0% mindshare in AV, compared to Numecent’s 14.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Numecent users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Virtual Server
Read 39 Microsoft Virtual Server reviews
  • 643 Views
  • 637 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Numecent Cloudpager
Read 1 Numecent Cloudpager review
  • 664 Views
  • 664 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Microsoft Virtual Server and Numecent Cloudpager are competing in virtualization and application delivery. Numecent Cloudpager has an advantage with its advanced features, justifying its cost for many buyers.

Features: Microsoft Virtual Server offers traditional virtual machine management, resource allocation, and basic server virtualization, suitable for organizations focused on these areas. Numecent Cloudpager stands out with application delivery, provides instant application access without full data transfers, and positions itself as versatile in dynamic environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Numecent Cloudpager uses a cloud-based deployment model, enhancing flexibility and scalability, while Microsoft Virtual Server requires significant on-premise setups. Numecent Cloudpager's customer service is noted for its responsiveness, whereas Microsoft Virtual Server relies on traditional support channels, which may not be as responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Virtual Server is cost-effective with lower upfront costs but offers potentially slower ROI. Numecent Cloudpager, though having higher initial expenses, promises faster ROI due to efficient application deployment and reduced operational overhead, emphasizing ongoing value through feature delivery.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Virtualization Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Application Virtualization
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server
Ranking in Application Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Numecent Cloudpager
Ranking in Application Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Microsoft Virtual Server is 6.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Numecent Cloudpager is 14.4%, up from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Virtualization Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Virtual Server6.0%
Numecent Cloudpager14.4%
Other79.6%
Application Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

UdaySiddu - PeerSpot reviewer
UdaySiddu
Software Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Virtual machines have improved cost savings and now provide safe, fast, snapshot-based recovery
Virtual Servers are valuable to us. We have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for the last five years. We use it for common applications and server applications. Microsoft Virtual Server machines are good compared to on-premises infrastructure. You can take a snapshot whenever we require it, and we can rebuild it. The data is safe, easily accessible, fast, and scalable. For snapshots, whenever we do any maintenance activity, the admin team takes snapshots. If there are any issues or upgrade problems, they revert back to the old one.
Read full review
it_user749919 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user749919
Application Packager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions
Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product helps us secure VMs from vulnerabilities in our systems like Sentinel. It indicates the threat via email notification."
"Everything is fine as far as our implementation goes."
"The solution is easy to manage."
"It is an expensive platform. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."
"Security, integration, and interface are the best features of Microsoft Virtual Server."
"It is stable and easy to use."
"We use the solution for internal business purposes."
"The most valuable features are monitoring, and the self-service that they have for a customized environment."
More Microsoft Virtual Server pros
"Driver virtualisation"
 

Cons

"The solution should be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"The solution's user interface could be improved."
"There could be more security features included in the product."
"While I am generally satisfied with the solution, it could slightly improve its stability."
"The tool must provide updates less frequently."
"The platform’s dashboard features could be better."
"In terms of what could be improved, pricing is always too high of course."
"The platform could provide more integration and stability."
More Microsoft Virtual Server cons
"Self-service Portal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution."
"The price of this product could be better."
"Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."
"Microsoft Virtual Server’s licensing is expensive."
"The solution has a yearly license. If we switch to a yearly subscription plan for Microsoft Virtual Server, it would be cheaper in the long run. The price per month would be higher, but the overall cost for the year would be lower."
"It is an expensive product."
"Some of the licensing costs are monthly, and others are yearly."
"There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs."
More Microsoft Virtual Server pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
30%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
University
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise15
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Virtual Server?
The solution is easy to manage.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Virtual Server?
I am not involved much in cost-related matters but heard from management that it is a better choice.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
For improvements, sometimes users use service accounts to log into the server. Identifying the server owner or the virtual machine owner is a difficult task for admins. Manually, someone needs to u...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

NextAxiom HyperService vs Microsoft Virtual Server Logo
NextAxiom HyperService vs Microsoft Virtual Server
Compared 54% of the time
More Microsoft Virtual Server Competitors
Microsoft App-V vs Numecent Cloudpager Logo
Microsoft App-V vs Numecent Cloudpager
Compared 62% of the time
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Numecent Cloudpager Logo
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Numecent Cloudpager
Compared 18% of the time
Inuvika vs Numecent Cloudpager Logo
Inuvika vs Numecent Cloudpager
Compared 10% of the time
More Numecent Cloudpager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Virtual Server
January 2026
Microsoft Virtual Server reportDownload Microsoft Virtual Server product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Virtualization
January 2026
Numecent Cloudpager reportDownload Numecent Cloudpager product report
 

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
No data available
 

Overview

The most cost-effective server virtualization technology is now available as a free download. Virtual Server is a key component of any server consolidation strategy. Increase hardware utilization and cut power costs while enabling your organization to rapidly configure and deploy new servers.
Microsoft

Numecent Cloudpager offers a comprehensive cloud management experience tailored for seamless application delivery, improving operational efficiency and resource utilization.

Numecent Cloudpager streamlines application management, reducing deployment time and enhancing security. It integrates seamlessly, making it a preferred choice for businesses aiming to optimize their cloud strategies. It supports rapid deployment across platforms, ensuring flexibility and scalability while maintaining data integrity and compliance. Its architecture caters to dynamic workloads and varying enterprise requirements, standing out for its adaptability and reliability.

What are the key features of Numecent Cloudpager?
  • Seamless Application Delivery: Facilitates efficient application provisioning without traditional installation barriers.
  • Robust Security: Incorporates enterprise-grade security protocols to safeguard data.
  • Scalability: Supports expanding business needs with elastic resource allocation.
  • Multi-Platform Compatibility: Ensures wide-ranging compatibility across different operating systems.
What benefits and ROI should be considered?
  • Cost-Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary overheads by optimizing resource allocation.
  • Time Savings: Streamlines operations, allowing quick implementation and minimizing downtime.
  • Enhanced Productivity: Frees up IT resources for strategic tasks by automating repetitive processes.
  • Improved Compliance: Assists in adhering to industry regulations with secure and traceable operations.

In the financial sector, Numecent Cloudpager simplifies complex data handling and ensures rapid deployment, crucial for timely transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it supports secure patient data applications, maintaining compliance with healthcare regulations. Retailers benefit from agile deployment, enhancing customer experiences with fast-paced initiatives.

Numecent
 

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365
Buyer's Guide
Application Virtualization
January 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.