Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Virtual Server vs Numecent Cloudpager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server
Ranking in Application Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Numecent Cloudpager
Ranking in Application Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Microsoft Virtual Server is 1.8%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Numecent Cloudpager is 13.7%, up from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

ChimeremezeNwabueze - PeerSpot reviewer
Eliminates the need for physical hardware and is not platform dependent
You can detach and reuse the storage drive without disrupting the virtual server, which is quite useful. Additionally, it provides options like network security groups to protect virtual machines from unauthorized access. The tool offers compatibility with various operating systems through the Azure Marketplace. You can access a wide range of Windows operating systems, both enterprise and commercial.
it_user749919 - PeerSpot reviewer
Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions
Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is reliable."
"Security, integration, and interface are the best features of Microsoft Virtual Server."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share folders and run Active Directory."
"Everything is fine as far as our implementation goes."
"The greatest aspect of the solution is its capability to be available from anywhere."
"The dashboard is valuable to us."
"The most valuable feature is the stability of the solution."
"Driver virtualisation"
 

Cons

"In the future release, I would like to see more automation. Moreover, improvements related to recovery could be beneficial."
"The platform’s dashboard features could be better."
"The bandwidth to Singapore could be scaled better."
"The product must provide easier rollouts."
"We've faced challenges with migrating virtual machines from one host to another. Also, managing Microsoft updates has been a struggle. We have to update the host node every month when new updates are released, and our virtual machines go down every time there's an update. This causes downtime repeatedly and irritates our clients. It should also be lightweight."
"It would be good if the tool's integration improved."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Microsoft Virtual Server's cost was an area of concern...I feel Microsoft Virtual Server will be stopped in a couple of months or a couple of years, and it will be completely replaced with SQL Server data warehouse and Microsoft Fabric."
"Self-service Portal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Virtual Server is an expensive solution."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a low-cost solution."
"The pricing must be improved."
"The solution has a yearly license. If we switch to a yearly subscription plan for Microsoft Virtual Server, it would be cheaper in the long run. The price per month would be higher, but the overall cost for the year would be lower."
"The price of this product could be better."
"The cost can also be optimized by changing the size of the implementation."
"Some of the licensing costs are monthly, and others are yearly."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
856,856 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
30%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
Computer Software Company
6%
University
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Virtual Server?
I am not involved much in cost-related matters but heard from management that it is a better choice.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
There is room for improvement in the user interface, which could be more user-friendly. Additionally, introducing a .NET experience with a drag-and-drop feature would enhance ease of report formati...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: May 2025.
856,856 professionals have used our research since 2012.