No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Virtual Server vs Numecent Cloudpager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server
Ranking in Application Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Numecent Cloudpager
Ranking in Application Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Microsoft Virtual Server is 6.7%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Numecent Cloudpager is 12.0%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Virtual Server6.7%
Numecent Cloudpager12.0%
Other81.3%
Application Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

UdaySiddu - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Virtual machines have improved cost savings and now provide safe, fast, snapshot-based recovery
Virtual Servers are valuable to us. We have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for the last five years. We use it for common applications and server applications. Microsoft Virtual Server machines are good compared to on-premises infrastructure. You can take a snapshot whenever we require it, and we can rebuild it. The data is safe, easily accessible, fast, and scalable. For snapshots, whenever we do any maintenance activity, the admin team takes snapshots. If there are any issues or upgrade problems, they revert back to the old one.
it_user749919 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Packager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions
Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is stable and easy to use."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is user-friendly."
"The performance, pricing, and PowerShell commands are valuable features."
"It is easy to use. It offers good compatibility with other operating systems. That's one of the reasons I used it."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"Security, integration, and interface are the best features of Microsoft Virtual Server."
"I appreciate the ease and speed with which I can set up and manage virtual machines using Microsoft Virtual Server."
"The product helps us secure VMs from vulnerabilities in our systems like Sentinel. It indicates the threat via email notification."
"While it does not have a large market share, Numecent's Solution is a fantastic solution."
"Driver virtualisation"
 

Cons

"The P2V process had some issues."
"There is room for improvement in the user interface, which could be more user-friendly."
"The response time from technical support could be faster."
"They should introduce a way to localize the currency for product pricing."
"Support could always be a bit better."
"It would be good if the tool's integration improved."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its stability."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Self-service Portal."
"Self-service Portal."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."
"The tool's cost has been taken care of with the help of Microsoft Fabric and with a consolidated or unified interface, where the entire product serves as a SaaS offering for the user."
"Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is an expensive solution."
"The price of this product could be better."
"Microsoft Virtual Server’s licensing is expensive."
"Some of the licensing costs are monthly, and others are yearly."
"The solution is very expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Construction Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Energy/Utilities Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise15
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Virtual Server?
I am not involved much in cost-related matters but heard from management that it is a better choice.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?
For improvements, sometimes users use service accounts to log into the server. Identifying the server owner or the virtual machine owner is a difficult task for admins. Manually, someone needs to u...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions
Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.