Microsoft Virtual Server vs Numecent Cloudpager comparison

Microsoft and Numecent are both solutions in the Application Virtualization category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Numecent is ranked #5. Microsoft holds a 5.9% mindshare in AV, compared to Numecent’s 13.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Numecent users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Virtual Server

Read 39 Microsoft Virtual Server reviews

833 Views
825 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Numecent Cloudpager

Read 1 Numecent Cloudpager review

660 Views
660 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Virtual Server

Numecent Cloudpager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Microsoft Virtual Server and Numecent Cloudpager are competing in virtualization and application delivery. Numecent Cloudpager has an advantage with its advanced features, justifying its cost for many buyers.

Features: Microsoft Virtual Server offers traditional virtual machine management, resource allocation, and basic server virtualization, suitable for organizations focused on these areas. Numecent Cloudpager stands out with application delivery, provides instant application access without full data transfers, and positions itself as versatile in dynamic environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Numecent Cloudpager uses a cloud-based deployment model, enhancing flexibility and scalability, while Microsoft Virtual Server requires significant on-premise setups. Numecent Cloudpager's customer service is noted for its responsiveness, whereas Microsoft Virtual Server relies on traditional support channels, which may not be as responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Virtual Server is cost-effective with lower upfront costs but offers potentially slower ROI. Numecent Cloudpager, though having higher initial expenses, promises faster ROI due to efficient application deployment and reduced operational overhead, emphasizing ongoing value through feature delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Virtual Server

Ranking in Application Virtualization

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Numecent Cloudpager

Ranking in Application Virtualization

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Microsoft Virtual Server is 5.9%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Numecent Cloudpager is 13.5%, up from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Virtual Server	5.9%
Numecent Cloudpager	13.5%
Other	80.6%

Application Virtualization

Featured Reviews

UdaySiddu

Software Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Virtual machines have improved cost savings and now provide safe, fast, snapshot-based recovery

Virtual Servers are valuable to us. We have been using Microsoft Virtual Server for the last five years. We use it for common applications and server applications. Microsoft Virtual Server machines are good compared to on-premises infrastructure. You can take a snapshot whenever we require it, and we can rebuild it. The data is safe, easily accessible, fast, and scalable. For snapshots, whenever we do any maintenance activity, the admin team takes snapshots. If there are any issues or upgrade problems, they revert back to the old one.

Read full review

it_user749919

Application Packager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions

Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product helps us secure VMs from vulnerabilities in our systems like Sentinel. It indicates the threat via email notification."

"Microsoft Virtual Server machines are good compared to on-premises infrastructure; you can take a snapshot whenever we require it, and we can rebuild it, and the data is safe, easily accessible, fast, and scalable."

"It has proven to be most effective for workloads associated with running web portals."

"The most valuable features are monitoring, and the self-service that they have for a customized environment."

"The most valuable feature is the stability of the solution."

"It is stable and easy to use."

"Microsoft Virtual Server is user-friendly."

"The solution provides easy monitoring and easy troubleshooting."

More Microsoft Virtual Server pros

"Driver virtualisation"

Cons

"The response time from technical support could be faster."

"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its patching. It should offer us a review before updates. The solution should also improve its pricing."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface, which could be more user-friendly."

"One feature I would like to see is better compatibility with macOS. Due to business policies, macOS isn't currently available in the Azure Marketplace. Microsoft should come to agreement with it."

"The solution should be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"The tool must provide updates less frequently."

"The main thing that could be improved is the licensing cost."

"Microsoft Virtual Server's cost was an area of concern...I feel Microsoft Virtual Server will be stopped in a couple of months or a couple of years, and it will be completely replaced with SQL Server data warehouse and Microsoft Fabric."

More Microsoft Virtual Server cons

"Self-service Portal."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no need for me to pay anything towards the solution's licensing costs."

"The pricing must be improved."

"Compared to the other products in the market, I believe that the prices of Microsoft Virtual Server are on the higher side."

"The solution is very expensive."

"It is an expensive product."

"It is an expensive platform. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"The cost can also be optimized by changing the size of the implementation."

"Microsoft Virtual Server’s licensing is expensive."

More Microsoft Virtual Server pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

29%

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Virtual Server?

The solution is easy to manage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Virtual Server?

I am not involved much in cost-related matters but heard from management that it is a better choice.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Virtual Server?

For improvements, sometimes users use service accounts to log into the server. Identifying the server owner or the virtual machine owner is a difficult task for admins. Manually, someone needs to u...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NextAxiom HyperService vs Microsoft Virtual Server

Compared 37% of the time

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Microsoft Virtual Server

Compared 32% of the time

More Microsoft Virtual Server Competitors

Microsoft App-V vs Numecent Cloudpager

Compared 57% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Numecent Cloudpager

Compared 21% of the time

Inuvika vs Numecent Cloudpager

Compared 12% of the time

More Numecent Cloudpager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Virtual Server

March 2026

Download Microsoft Virtual Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

March 2026

Download Numecent Cloudpager product report

Also Known As

Virtual Server, MS Virtual Server

No data available

Overview

The most cost-effective server virtualization technology is now available as a free download. Virtual Server is a key component of any server consolidation strategy. Increase hardware utilization and cut power costs while enabling your organization to rapidly configure and deploy new servers.

Microsoft

Numecent Cloudpager offers a comprehensive cloud management experience tailored for seamless application delivery, improving operational efficiency and resource utilization.

Numecent Cloudpager streamlines application management, reducing deployment time and enhancing security. It integrates seamlessly, making it a preferred choice for businesses aiming to optimize their cloud strategies. It supports rapid deployment across platforms, ensuring flexibility and scalability while maintaining data integrity and compliance. Its architecture caters to dynamic workloads and varying enterprise requirements, standing out for its adaptability and reliability.

What are the key features of Numecent Cloudpager?

Seamless Application Delivery: Facilitates efficient application provisioning without traditional installation barriers.
Robust Security: Incorporates enterprise-grade security protocols to safeguard data.
Scalability: Supports expanding business needs with elastic resource allocation.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Ensures wide-ranging compatibility across different operating systems.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary overheads by optimizing resource allocation.
Time Savings: Streamlines operations, allowing quick implementation and minimizing downtime.
Enhanced Productivity: Frees up IT resources for strategic tasks by automating repetitive processes.
Improved Compliance: Assists in adhering to industry regulations with secure and traceable operations.

In the financial sector, Numecent Cloudpager simplifies complex data handling and ensures rapid deployment, crucial for timely transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it supports secure patient data applications, maintaining compliance with healthcare regulations. Retailers benefit from agile deployment, enhancing customer experiences with fast-paced initiatives.

Numecent

Sample Customers

Paylocity, ASELSAN, Sochi Organizing Committee, Supervisor of Elections, Orange County, Florida, Netgem, Nav Canada, The British & Irish Lions

Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.