Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

Nutanix and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Nutanix is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform...

Read 1 Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) review

165 Views
152 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Read 49 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews

7,970 Views
6,590 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform...

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 11, 2025

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) are contenders in the container orchestration market. Red Hat OpenShift tends to have an advantage in pricing and support services, while NKP offers stronger advanced features appealing to businesses seeking extensive functionality.

Features: Red Hat OpenShift is known for comprehensive tools supporting CI/CD pipelines, flexible scalability options, and secure container management. Nutanix Kubernetes Platform highlights seamless integration with existing infrastructure, superior resource management, and high performance in multi-cloud environments. NKP emphasizes infrastructure integration, whereas OpenShift gears more towards developer-centric tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix Kubernetes Platform has a simplified deployment process and top-tier support services, allowing for quick setup and problem resolution. Red Hat OpenShift has a more complex deployment but offers extensive documentation and a robust support network. NKP benefits from streamlined deployment, while OpenShift provides extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat OpenShift offers competitive pricing models and a strong ROI due to support and stability. Nutanix Kubernetes Platform may have higher initial setup costs but provides a significant ROI through resource efficiency and scalability. OpenShift balances cost-effectiveness with NKP's performance and scalability benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform...

Ranking in Container Management

18th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift Container...

Ranking in Container Management

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

YogeshWagh

Technology Head of Delivery at SBICAP Securities Ltd.

Effective monitoring with built-in dashboards enhances usage insights, but support needs improvement due to resource reallocations

There are some limitations with the non-air gap version as it requires complete internet access, which poses restrictions due to government regulations. The dashboards also face issues with internet access to repositories, such as GitHub ( /products/github-reviews ), impacting their functionality. Installation queries exist in the air gap version, and professional support from Nutanix lacks efficiency.

Read full review

Vlado Velkovski

DevOps Architect at KIBS

Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime

OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account. There are a few versions of OpenShift. There is the normal OpenShift and an OpenShift Plus license. Red Hat could think of how to connect those two subscriptions because, with Red Hat Plus, you have one tool called ACM (Advanced Cluster Management), where you can manage multiple clusters from one place. We deployed this functionality by ourselves, but if you don't pay the license for Red Hat OpenShift Plus, you'll lack this functionality. If you have a multi-cloud environment and you have a lot of work to do, it would be a plus if the Red Had OpenShift Plus license came in a bundle with the regular solutions. This ACM tool should be available in the normal subscription, not just the Plus version. There are new versions on an almost weekly basis. I found myself that the upgrading of OpenShift clusters is not a task that will successfully finish every time. It's a simple and quick, but not reliable process. That's why we use multiple clusters. We use v4.10.3, but we want to move to v4.12.X. The upgrade process itself can fail, and we don't have backups of our OpenShift cluster because we have backups of all the Kubernetes manifests on GitHub. We destroy the cluster, bring up a new one quickly, and apply those scripts. The upgrade itself could be more resilient for us as administrators of OpenShift to be sure that it'll succeed and not occasionally fail. They can improve the reliability of their upgrade process. They also have implementations of some Red Hat-verified operators for a lot of products like Elasticsearch. They're good enough for development purposes, but some of the OpenShift operators still lack resilient production-grade configurations. Red Hat says that we have a few hundred operators, but I believe that only half of them are production-grade ready at this moment. They need to work much more on those operators to become more flexible because you can deploy all of them in development mode, but when we go to production grade and want to make specific changes to the operator and configuration, we lack those possibilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform is stable."

"Autoscaling is an excellent feature that makes it very simple to scale our applications as required."

"Dashboards... give us all the details we need to see about the microservices."

"OpenShift provides tools that tell me everything I have on a container, and I can make it on-premise or on a cloud infrastructure."

"The most valuable features of OpenShift include its advanced security, integrated DNS system, built-in pipeline management with Tekton, enhanced networking routes, and dedicated platforms for DataOps and MLOps."

"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."

"It is very lightweight and can be deployed very fast, especially when it comes to containers."

"The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users."

"The platform has significantly improved our organization by enhancing productivity and reducing the time required to deploy applications."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros

Cons

"There are some limitations with the non-air gap version as it requires complete internet access, which poses restrictions due to government regulations."

"Getting the solution quickly and troubleshooting quickly are both areas where I think it needs some work."

"OpenShift needs to improve their container storage."

"I believe that the documentation part is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Container Platform could be improved if we could aggregate logs out of the box instead of having to do it through integrations with other products."

"The stability needs improvement."

"The product could benefit from additional operators and tools integrated with OpenShift."

"Quality of support may be improved."

"OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is expensive for licensing."

"Its price is a bit high because it's a premium product, but as long as the business is ready to pay for that, it's okay."

"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten. There is a subscription called OpenShift Plus, which offers additional features and products the vendor provides to complement the OpenShift Container Platform. These include ACM, Red Hat Quay, and Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation."

"The pricing is a bit more expensive than expected."

"OpenShift pricing varies by region. For example, a simple cluster with three nodes in DAL-10 might cost around $560 to $580 per month, subject to specific configurations like memory and CPU cores."

"The product is expensive."

"It depends on who you're talking to. For a large corporation, it is acceptable, other than the significant infrastructure requirements. For a small organization, it is in no way suitable, and we'd go for Amazon's container solution."

"OpenShift Container Platform is highly-priced."

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)?

We have implemented Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-platform-nkp-reviews ) for running our workloads in our government organization. We are currently testing it wit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)?

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) overall rating would be around seven out of ten. We have not fully explored all features to the fullest extent yet. They could improve the quality of their support...

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift Container Platform?

The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?

OpenShift pricing varies by region. For example, a simple cluster with three nodes in DAL-10 might cost around $560 to $580 per month, subject to specific configurations like memory and CPU cores.

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)

Compared 28% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)

Compared 14% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)

Compared 13% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) Competitors

Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 50% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Kubernetes vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

March 2025

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform

March 2025

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report

Download Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report

Overview

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) offers a comprehensive solution for managing Kubernetes environments, catering to complex enterprise requirements with robust functionality and ease of use.

NKP delivers an integrated approach to deploying, managing, and scaling Kubernetes clusters. It simplifies operations with features that enhance scalability, security, and efficiency. By offering seamless integration with existing infrastructure, it eases the transition to a cloud-native ecosystem, enabling enterprises to leverage Kubernetes to its fullest potential.

What are the most important features of NKP?

Automated Operations: Streamlines cluster management by automating routine tasks.
Security and Compliance: Offers advanced features to ensure data protection and regulatory compliance.
Scalability: Easily scales resources to meet growing demands.
Unified Management: Provides a single interface for managing on-premises and cloud-based Kubernetes environments.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers built-in tools for continuous monitoring and performance optimization.

What benefits or ROI should you look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs through automation and streamlined processes.
Improved Agility: Enhances development speed and response to market changes.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes resource usage through efficient management.
Enhanced Security: Protects data and applications with robust security features.
Lower Time to Market: Accelerates deployment of applications and services.

NKP finds application in industries ranging from healthcare to finance, where reliable and scalable infrastructure is critical. In healthcare, it aids in managing sensitive data with strict compliance requirements. The finance sector benefits from its ability to securely handle large volumes of transactions while ensuring high availability.

Nutanix

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.