Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.4, while Trellix is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. Palo Alto Networks holds a 7.4% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Read 28 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

3,236 Views
2,492 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Read 15 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews

1,065 Views
927 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System compete in the cybersecurity market. Palo Alto appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, ease of management, and robust cloud options, despite Trellix's competitive pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Palo Alto Networks offers a next-generation firewall with machine learning for threat detection, WildFire for advanced sandboxing, and strong URL filtering. Trellix focuses on real-time threat intelligence, efficient DDoS attack management, and stable performance supported by automated signature updates.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks could improve its initial setup complexity, resource consumption, and expand protocol integrations. Users also suggest enhancements in email protection and pricing. Trellix's management interface needs simplification, along with better detection capabilities and improved documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer primarily on-premises deployments, with Palo Alto providing more cloud deployment options. Palo Alto generally has better-rated customer support, though some users express concerns about local support quality. Trellix is praised for good support but criticized for complex console navigation and limited support resources in certain regions.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto is perceived as expensive, particularly in smaller markets, but its advanced features justify the cost for many and offer strong ROI due to comprehensive security functionalities. Trellix, offering competitive pricing and no licensing fees, appeals to budget-conscious buyers and provides value through its effectiveness and cost structure.

To learn more, read our detailed Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 7.4%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 3.5%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Nasir Akbar

Presales Engineer at SAUDI PARAMOUNT COMPUTER SYSTEMS

Numerous support challenges arise but unique security features impress

In this scenario with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, I did not get any opportunity to work on it. The only thing I did was forward the logs to the SIEM solution.For government entities, they are not allowing configuration changes. For non-government users, there is a support portal to get the configuration file and upload it to the portal. We can identify misconfigurations and where the loop is very big, so we can get the report and establish it. In Saudi Arabia specifically, the support service needs improvement. When customers have incidents with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and want to open a case with the Palo Alto team, the available number in Saudi Arabia leads to a long procedure. They're not able to answer within one or two hours. This needs to be implemented. They may need to open offices in Dubai or other places for Arabic-speaking people to access TAC support.

Read full review

Daniel_Martins

Head of Management Security Services at NetSafe Corp

Decade of experience empowers seamless problem resolution and support

I haven't seen threat intelligence and machine learning for predictive threat analysis in the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System yet. For Trellix IPS, AI improvements are an area where it can improve. It's a significant feature. Regarding the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System's flexibility for catering to our organization's specific infrastructure requirements, we have only on-premises and virtual appliances, but it's acceptable. The access and platform could potentially integrate with SaaS. Similar to when you put the EPO in mode integration with SaaS, you can connect with a local credential and with an X Console credential. Another possibility would be to connect with an integration login with the X Console. We have this with EPO on-premise, but with IPS, we don't have it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Edge protection is a valuable feature."

"I rate Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention as nine out of ten."

"It's very easy to use and configure. What is nice about Palo Alto is that even if you don't understand how to use it, you can just click on upload and upload everything that needs to be blocked."

"The most valuable feature is its use of machine learning to detect potentially unknown threats."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."

"I like the solution's interface."

"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."

"It effectively prevents malware, ransomware, and other attacks."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros

"The feature I found most valuable is the network threat analyzer in the security platform. It also integrates with GTI, or Global Threat Intelligence. Otherwise, I just use the basic features."

"The product is worth the investment."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution can scale."

"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."

"McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco."

"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."

"The most valuable features are the customization of the signature and the unlimited amount of signatures in IPS."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros

Cons

"Generally, to deploy it will take some downtime, about a day."

"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."

"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."

"The behavioral detection capabilities could be expanded to address all threats at the perimeter, reducing the reliance on endpoint detection and response systems."

"The installation was complicated."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."

"Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted."

"Palo Alto's maintenance needs to be improved."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons

"We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler."

"The management console needs to be less complex and easier to navigate."

"There are limited resources for configuration guidance."

"The Network Security Managers could be more stable, agile, and work faster. When it comes to instability, there is room for improvement."

"The management component could be simplified."

"Integration with Global Thereat Intelligence could be better. Also, I think management solutions are end of life now at McAfee. Network threat analyzer may be used for endpoint quarantines. Integration between these sides, as well as endpoint APO, will help you quarantine the risky endpoints."

"The platform’s GUI could be the latest."

"The technical support must be improved."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."

"It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."

"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."

"The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."

"Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."

"It's not too expensive."

"The pricing could be lower."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"The tool is competitively priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

It is a stable product.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires an add-on license and is considered expensive compared to competitors like Cisco AMP and FortiGate ( /products/fortinet-fortigate-reviews ) fi...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?

The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?

The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 15% of the time

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 13% of the time

Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 29% of the time

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 10% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

August 2025

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

July 2025

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report

Download Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS

Overview

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

July 2025

Free Report: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.