Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs Wiz comparison

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Se...

Read 42 Wiz reviews

30,746 Views
17,525 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Wiz are two prominent solutions for Kubernetes security. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes has the upper hand in customer support and affordability, while Wiz is favored for its extensive feature set despite a higher price.

Features: Users of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes value its robust integration with existing Red Hat ecosystems, comprehensive container security features, and ease of use within Red Hat environments. Wiz stands out with its advanced threat detection capabilities, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration with multiple cloud platforms. Red Hat offers seamless ecosystem integration, while Wiz provides more extensive threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes needs more extensive automation, simpler policy management, and enhanced scalability. Wiz users desire better documentation, more customizable alerting features, and improved integration with hybrid environments. Red Hat users seek better automation, while Wiz users focus on enhanced documentation and alerting flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is easy to deploy, especially within Red Hat environments, and has excellent customer service. Wiz is user-friendly in deployment but needs better support for complex setups in hybrid environments. Red Hat excels in deployment simplicity and customer service, while Wiz provides a user-friendly deployment but requires improved support for complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes has reasonable setup costs and offers good ROI due to integration with existing Red Hat products. Wiz has higher setup costs but delivers significant ROI through its advanced features. Red Hat is affordable with good ROI, while Wiz, despite higher costs, is valued for its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs. Wiz Report (Updated: April 2026).

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs. Wiz

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Se...

Ranking in Container Security

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wiz

Ranking in Container Security

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (1st), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (1st), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (1st), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (1st), Compliance Management (2nd), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is 1.7%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wiz is 9.7%, down from 17.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Wiz	9.7%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes	1.7%
Other	88.6%

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Daniel Stevens

Software Engineer at Galley

Offers easy management and container connection with HTTPS, but the support needs to improve

I have experience with the solution's setup in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and our company has assisted in the development of a cluster in a research department, but we didn't start from scratch because we have IT professionals who have installed Kubernetes across 12 nodes of a cluster and a new environment can be created for a new platform. I also had another setup experience of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes in Portugal where I had to implement the solution in a cluster of 22 computer servers, which was completed with assistance from the IT department of the company. The initial setup process of the solution can be considered as difficult. The setup process involves using the permissions, subnets and range of IPs, which makes it complex. Deploying Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes takes around eight to ten hours for new clusters. The solution's deployment can be divided into three parts. The first part involves OpenStack, where the cluster's resources need to be identified. The second part involves virtualizing assets and identifying other physical assets, for which OpenStack, Kubernetes, or OpenShift are used. The third part of the deployment involves dividing the networks into subnetworks and implementing automation to deploy the microservices using Helm. The number of professionals required for the solution's deployment depends upon the presence of automated scripts. Ideally, two or three professionals are required to set up Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes.

Read full review

Peter Whelan

CISO at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Improved our security posture thanks to comprehensive visibility

I have contacted Wiz technical support frequently. The support is excellent. We contact via an in-application portal. We can see the support cases we personally open, and also the cases that other people have opened from our company. I appreciate that feature. Generally, support gets back to us within a few days with a good answer. There was one fellow in particular who has been knocking it out of the park. He is a great support person to deal with. We are happy with the support experience. If I were to put Wiz support on a scale from one to ten, I would give them a ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is good."

"Segmentation is the most powerful feature."

"The benefit of working with the solution is the fact that it's very straightforward...It is a perfectly stable product since the details are very accurate."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring feature."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to share resources."

"The most beneficial security feature of the product revolves around the areas of vulnerability and configuration."

"Offers easy management with authentication and authorization features"

More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes pros

"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."

"Wiz positively impacts my organization, especially since we are in the insurance sector where data security is paramount."

"The most valuable feature of Wiz is that it keeps information up to date without needing to perform scans or schedule maintenance windows. It provides a fresh snapshot of our vulnerability metrics."

"If anyone wants to secure their infrastructure, cloud environment, or Kubernetes cluster, I would strongly recommend Wiz as a tool because it is easy to use and user-friendly."

"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."

"Wiz saves time by validating a network misconfiguration by not only looking at the cloud asset configuration but also by testing if a port that is stated to be open is actually open."

"Wiz distinguished itself immediately in the PoC, surfacing important issues that were entirely missed by both the products we were already using and other CNAPP's that we tested."

"I rate Wiz's customer service as ten out of ten."

More Wiz pros

Cons

"Red Hat is somewhat expensive."

"They're trying to convert it to the platform as a source. They are moving in the direction of Cloud Foundry so it can be easier for a developer to deploy it."

"The solution's visibility and vulnerability prevention should be improved."

"The solution lacks features when compared to some of the competitors such as Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and has room for improvement."

"The testing process could be improved."

"The deprecation of APIs is a concern since the deprecation of APIs will cause issues for us every time we upgrade."

"They're trying to convert it to the platform as a source. They are moving in the direction of Cloud Foundry so it can be easier for a developer to deploy it."

"I do see that some features associated with the IAST part are not included in the tool, making it an area where improvements are required."

More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes cons

"We are still analyzing its behavior as we are in the midst of the implementation."

"Wiz does encounter some glitches similar to other tools in the market; I remember facing certain challenges, such as problems scanning encrypted disks or discrepancies in the findings from already remediated vulnerabilities not reflecting accurately in the tool."

"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."

"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."

"Once you get a threat and fix it, to see that fix reflected in Wiz, you have to wait 24 hours. That is something I am not happy with."

"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."

"More or less, Wiz is doing well, but the false alerts at random times would be another area for improvement."

"The APIs are currently quite limited and not very mature, which makes integration with Splunk difficult."

More Wiz cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Red Hat offers two pricing options for their solution: a separate price, and a bundled price under the OpenShift Platform Plus."

"It's a costly solution"

"We purchase a yearly basis license for the solution."

"The price of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is better than Palo Alto Prisma."

"The pricing model is moderate, meaning it is not very expensive."

"The pricing seems pretty simple. We don't have to do a lot of calculations to figure out what the components are. They do it by enabling specific features, either basics or advanced, which makes it easy to select."

"Regarding pricing, it’s more than $100k because we have a very big infrastructure. Our environment supports around three thousand people, and we offer business-to-client financial services to around one million clients, so we rely heavily on Wiz."

"Based on the features and capabilities, the product pricing seems reasonable."

"I wish the pricing was more transparent."

"The cost of the other solutions is comparable to Wiz."

"Wiz is a moderately priced solution, where it is neither cheap nor costly."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as a five out of ten."

"The pricing is fair and comparable to their competitors. The cost seems to be going up, which is a concern. There are potential savings from consolidating tools, but we're uncertain how Wiz's pricing will change over time."

More Wiz pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?

From an improvement perspective, I would like to create new policies in the tool, especially if it is deployed for the prevention part, but currently, we need to do it manually. I hear that Palo Al...

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?

I use the solution in my company for vulnerability management, configuration management, compliance, safety handling, and everything else.

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?

The tool's policy management supports our company's compliance efforts since any corporate entity or enterprise must follow specific regulations, which include periodic analysis and configuration r...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wiz?

Wiz is expensive, but it offers good value for the money.

What needs improvement with Wiz?

I choose eight out of ten because there is always room for improvement. Possibly I am not able to identify it, but definitely there would be some room for improvement. Nothing is perfect in terms o...

What is your primary use case for Wiz?

My main use case for Wiz is that it identifies misconfigurations within the cloud services and misconfiguration within the Kubernetes platform. We also detect vulnerabilities within the runtime fro...

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes Competitors

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Wiz

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Wiz

Compared 5% of the time

Orca Security vs Wiz

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Wiz

Compared 4% of the time

Upwind vs Wiz

Compared 3% of the time

More Wiz Competitors

Product Reports

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes

Download Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes product report

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes report

Download Wiz product report

Also Known As

StackRox

No data available

Overview

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes empowers organizations with robust capabilities in container security, vulnerability management, and workload transition, seamlessly integrated with OpenShift for optimal orchestration.

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes stands out with its comprehensive features like authentication, authorization, and API integration. Users appreciate resource sharing, segmentation, and virtualization capabilities, all facilitated by a user-friendly Cockpit web interface and command administration. The system's strengths are visible through effective security protocols, such as secure UPI images, container networking, and built-in security features. Its advanced cluster management and monitoring ensure efficiency, while focus on vulnerability and configuration management addresses key concerns. However, improvements in documentation, web UI, and API flexibility are needed, with challenges in command line configuration and deployment also noted. Stability issues due to API deprecation and the need for enhanced zero trust, access control, and database connectivity present room for growth.

What are the key features of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?

API Integration: Seamless integration capabilities with APIs for enhanced automation.
Resource Sharing: Effective resource distribution within clustered environments.
Secure UPI Images: Encrypted images for heightened security and safety.
Container Networking: Modern networking protocols for efficient container communication.
Communication Mapping: Detailed network traffic visualization and analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes?

Vulnerability Management: In-depth identification and mitigation of security threats.
Compliance Management: Ensures adherence to regulatory standards and practices.
Integration with OpenShift: Streamlined orchestration for enhanced deployment flexibility.
Threat Detection: Advanced capabilities for monitoring and responding to potential security breaches.

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes is implemented across various industries to facilitate the transition from traditional monolithic applications to dynamic containerized environments. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology benefit from its robust segmentation, monitoring abilities, and behavior analysis. With the integration of Istio and GRPC, industries achieve secure microservices communication and improved visibility for comprehensive threat monitoring.

Red Hat

Wiz offers cloud security management with key capabilities in visibility, risk prioritization, and comprehensive analysis. It supports multi-cloud environments, ensuring robust integration and streamlining security tasks effectively.

Known for its advanced features like CSPM module, Security Graph, and Threat Intelligence, Wiz enables cloud integration while minimizing false positives. Its agentless deployment and high-risk analysis granularity improve operational efficiency. Users note desires for better reporting, more security features, enhanced integration, notably for APIs and cloud services like Kubernetes. Challenges include dashboard customization limits, remediation automation, scanning frequency, and cost concerns, particularly in Brazil. Users adopt Wiz for tasks including cloud security posture management, vulnerability identification, automated security measures, and integrating security tools, effectively managing security in AWS, Azure, and GCP.

What are the key features of Wiz?

CSPM Module: Provides consistent cloud posture oversight.
Security Graph: Enables holistic threat understanding.
Threat Intelligence: Delivers timely insights for proactive measures.
Agentless Deployment: Simplifies setup across infrastructures.
Comprehensive Cloud Integration: Supports multiple platforms seamlessly.

What benefits should users expect?

Time Efficiency: Minimizes false positives and consolidates alerts.
Enhanced Security: Offers granular risk analysis and vulnerability detection.
Automated Compliance: Streamlines compliance processes across platforms.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces need for extensive personnel despite high costs.

Companies in industries with complex cloud architectures, like finance and healthcare, leverage Wiz for its multi-cloud support, managing risks and compliance efficiently. Its integration with container technologies aids sectors reliant on Kubernetes. Retailers benefit from visibility into misconfigurations, ensuring robust customer data protection.

Sample Customers

City National Bank, U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Wiz is the fastest growing software company ever - $100M ARR in 18 months: Wiz becomes the fastest-growing software company ever | Wiz Blog Discover why companies, including Salesforce, Morgan Stanley, Fox, and Bridgewater choose Wiz as their cloud security partner. Read their success stories here: Customers | Wiz

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs. Wiz