Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Sonar and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tenable is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Sonar holds a 20.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.
SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Read 117 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews
  • 38,362 Views
  • 24,552 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Tenable.io Web Application ...
Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews
  • 1,889 Views
  • 1,492 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

SonarQube and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the realm of quality assurance and application security. Tenable.io seems to have the upper hand due to its robust security-centric capabilities and comprehensive vulnerability scanning across web applications, which align well with security benchmarks.

Features: SonarQube Server supports a wide range of programming languages and offers customizable features and rules that help improve code quality. It integrates well with various tools and provides a community-driven plugin ecosystem. Tenable.io offers extensive vulnerability scanning capabilities and integrates seamlessly into existing security infrastructure, focusing on delivering robust security benchmarks and comprehensive web application assessments.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube faces challenges in ease of configuration, multi-language support, and managing false positives. Improvements in its security scanning capabilities and a more intuitive interface could enhance usability. Tenable.io requires more flexible reporting options and better vulnerability management processes. Enhancements in dashboard functionalities and API scanning support are also suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube, adaptable to various environments including on-premises and hybrid cloud setups, involves a learning curve with its reliance on community support and dedicated management. Tenable.io's SaaS model in the public cloud offers ease of use, though there are calls for improved technical support and user support structures. Pricing is a consideration, with Tenable.io being more expensive due to its advanced security features.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube provides an open-source version with optional paid plugins, making it cost-effective for teams focusing on code quality, although enterprise features might come at a higher cost. Tenable.io is costly, especially for small businesses, but its comprehensive security features justify the expense. Both solutions typically provide positive ROI by enhancing security measures and code quality, varying based on deployment scale and feature requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
117
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
Tenable.io Web Application ...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
18th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 20.5%, down from 26.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)20.5%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning1.3%
Other78.2%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support
The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.
Read full review
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly Recommended Solution with Latest Scanning Methods
The setup of the solution is straightforward. It involves installing the package and gaining access. It took no time at all since we deployed it on the cloud. We assigned the necessary configurations, and everything was set up and ready to go within a few seconds. I would rate the setup as a perfect ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The fact that the solution does security scanning is valuable."
"We consider it a handy tool that helps to resolve our issues immediately."
"Some of the static code analysis capabilities are the most beneficial."
"Some of the most valuable features have been the latest up-to-date of the OWASP, the monitoring, the reporting, and the ease of use with the IDE plugins, in terms of integration."
"Integrate it into the developers' workbench so that they can bench check their code against what will be done in the server-based audit version."
"SonarQube is admin friendly."
"The stability is good."
"Using SonarQube benefits us because we are able to avoid the inclusion of malware in our applications."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros
"It is fully automated."
"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."
"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."
"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."
"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."
"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."
"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."
More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros
 

Cons

"Our developers have complained about the Quality Gates and the number of false positives that this product reports."
"A little bit more emphasis on security and a bit more security scanning features would be nice."
"Code security could be better. They are already focusing on it, but I see a lot of improvement opportunities over there. I can see a lot of false positives in terms of security. They need to make the tests more accurate so that the false positives are not detected so frequently. It would also help if they provided us with an installer."
"A better design of the interface and add some new rules."
"It should be user-friendly."
"I have found this solution creates more noise than competitors."
"We previously experienced issues with security but a segregated security violation has been implemented and the issues we experienced are being fixed."
"After scanning our code and generating a report, it would be helpful if SonarQube could also generate a solution to fix vulnerabilities in the report."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons
"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."
"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."
"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The report customization needs to be better."
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."
"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."
"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."
More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SonarQube is a fairly affordable solution for a larger scale if you have a specific role or specific department for secure code."
"I think comparing the product to competitors it should be less expensive."
"We are using the open-source community version, but there are enterprise licenses available."
"This product is open source and very convenient."
"The licence is standard open source licensing"
"Get the paid version which allows the customized dashboard and provides technical support."
"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of cost."
"The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty decent."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."
"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."
"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."
"The pricing is okay."
"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."
"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."
"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise75
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
See all answers
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
See all answers
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 20% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 10% of the time
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 10% of the time
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 6% of the time
Semgrep vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Semgrep vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 6% of the time
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors
Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 18% of the time
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 10% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 8% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 8% of the time
Veracode vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
Veracode vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 6% of the time
More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
September 2025
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reportDownload SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
September 2025
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reportDownload Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report
 

Also Known As

Sonar
No data available
 

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?
  • Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
  • Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
  • Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
  • CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
  • Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.
What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?
  • Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
  • Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
  • Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
  • Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IMDEX
Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
September 2025
Free Report: SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.