SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

SonarSource Sàrl and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. SonarSource Sàrl is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Tenable is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. SonarSource Sàrl holds a 16.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of SonarSource Sàrl users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

SonarQube

Read 134 SonarQube reviews

38,374 Views
26,862 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,165 Views
1,754 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SonarQube

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

SonarQube and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in code analysis and vulnerability detection. SonarQube leads in language support and integration, while Tenable.io is stronger in vulnerability scanning for web applications.

Features: SonarQube offers integration with Continuous Integration pipelines, custom coding rules, and support for over 20 programming languages. Tenable.io provides detailed reporting, seamless cloud integration, and prioritization of vulnerabilities, aiding in efficient threat management.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube needs to improve its interface, offer comprehensive security scanning, and support more recent languages. Tenable.io could enhance dashboard usability, allow more report customization, and offer more user-friendly scanning options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube supports hybrid, on-premises, and public cloud deployments, appealing to varied infrastructure needs, yet lacks official support for community editions. Tenable.io is easy to deploy in public cloud environments but less flexible for on-premises use, with adequate customer service that could benefit from more transparency.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube's open-source model is cost-effective, especially with its free edition, though the enterprise edition is expensive. Tenable.io is considered costly for smaller businesses. Both show improved ROI through better code quality and reduced vulnerabilities, yet SonarQube’s pricing is more attractive for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed SonarQube vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

134

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of SonarQube is 16.9%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube	16.9%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.4%
Other	81.7%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

KarthikHarpanhalli

Sr Software Engineering Supervisor at Mozarc Medical

Gains control over rule customization and achieves reliable vulnerability assessment

The deployment process took me about 2 or 3 hours to deploy SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), although I do not remember exactly since it was done about 2 years back. Currently, about 10 of my developers are using SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in my company. I do not have plans to increase the usage of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in the future as there will not be any requirement to increase. I am a senior software engineer and supervisor at Mozark Medical. My corporate email address is karthik.k.a.r.t.h.i.k.h.a.r.p.a.n.h.a.l.l.i@mozarkmedical.com. Overall, I would rate SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Jonathan-Pereira

Cyber Security Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized license management transforms asset manipulation based on functions and improves security posture

Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions. It provides a centralized view from end-to-end to its assets' identities and vulnerabilities. One of the greatest features is Kubernetes. The automated scanning capability is pretty standard in the market, and Tenable's prioritization engine helps improve the security posture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers a very good community edition."

"It automatically scans for code, detects vulnerabilities, and generates daily reports."

"SonarQube is good in terms of code review and to report on basic vulnerabilities in your applications."

"My focus is mainly on the DevOps pipeline side of things, and from my perspective, the ease of use and configuration is valuable. It is pretty straightforward to take a deployment pipeline or CI/CD pipeline and integrate SonarQube into it."

"It is a very good tool for analysis and security vulnerability checking."

"Some of the most valuable features have been the latest up-to-date of the OWASP, the monitoring, the reporting, and the ease of use with the IDE plugins, in terms of integration."

"When we push our code to the repo, while in continuous integration, it will run a few tests and based on the vulnerability data set it has, it can track the vulnerabilities, indicate the code line where the issue exists, and show how much code is covered by all the unit tests, integration tests, and those sorts of things."

"The most valuable features are the analysis and detection of issues within the application code."

More SonarQube pros

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"It would be a great add-on if SonarQube could update its database for vulnerabilities or plugging parts."

"I see a problem with SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) because the vulnerability assessment is continuous; if I fix some vulnerabilities today, they reappear in the next scan, and there will be completely different issues that need to be fixed."

"There are limitations to the free version that limit development options as far as languages."

"It would be better if SonarQube provided a good UI for external configuration."

"I would also like SonarQube to be able to write custom scanning rules. More documentation would be helpful as well because some of our guys were struggling with the customization script."

"We also use Fortify, which is another tool to find security errors. Fortify is a better security tool. It is better than SonarQube in finding errors. Sometimes, SonarQube doesn't find some of the errors that Fortify is able to find. Fortify also has a community, which SonarQube doesn't have. Its installation is a little bit complex. We need to install a database, install the product, and specify the version of the database and the product. They can simplify the installation and make it easier. We use docker for the installation because it is easier to use. Its dashboard needs to be improved. It is not intuitive. It is hard to understand the interface, and it can be improved to provide a better user experience."

"Code security could be better. They are already focusing on it, but I see a lot of improvement opportunities over there. I can see a lot of false positives in terms of security. They need to make the tests more accurate so that the false positives are not detected so frequently. It would also help if they provided us with an installer."

"During the setup process, we only had one issue related to the number of available files. To perform the analysis, you have quite a lot of available file handles, so we had to increase that limit."

More SonarQube cons

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"The market is standard for vulnerability scanning, however, the posture can be improved through Tenable's prioritization engine."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

"We are using the Developer Edition and the cost is based on the amount of code that is being processed."

"We use the free version; there are no hidden costs or licensing required."

"We are using the Community edition of SonarQube."

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

"The price of this solution is more expensive than competitors. However, it works better than competitors."

"It's a bit expensive for us. The currency rate of the dollar is a problem but it may be fine for other countries."

"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."

More SonarQube pricing and cost advice

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The pricing is okay."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	79

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

If there were a solution, I would like to see automation and an integrated remediation solution for vulnerability or patch management.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I do not understand what API approach means; I do not understand this term. I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment. My review rating for this pro...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube

Compared 28% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube

Compared 5% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube

Compared 4% of the time

More SonarQube Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 12% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube

January 2026

Download SonarQube product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Sonar, SonarQube Cloud

No data available

Interactive Demo

SonarSource Sàrl

Demo not available

Tenable

Overview

SonarQube leads automated code review, enhancing code quality and security in AI-driven SDLCs. It analyzes pull requests, providing developers with actionable feedback and AI-driven fixes before code merges. Trusted by top enterprises, it supports SaaS and self-managed deployments.

SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins. It is renowned for its static code analysis, code coverage, and security vulnerability detection. While its open-source foundation and scalability are praised, users seek enhanced integration across multiple languages, better security features, and improved documentation. Despite challenges, its ability to automate code inspections and ensure compliance with coding standards makes it essential in software development processes, facilitating continuous improvement.

What are the most important features?

Language Support: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
Custom Coding Rules: Allows defining project-specific rules.
Integration: Seamlessly works with Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines.
Quality Gates: Simplifies monitoring code quality.
Dashboards: Facilitates easy monitoring and management.
Static Code Analysis: Detects issues early in development.
Security Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities automatically.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Code Quality: Enhances reliability and maintainability.
Security Assurance: Strengthens code against vulnerabilities.
Technical Debt Reduction: Ensures cleaner, maintainable code.
Efficient Feedback: Speeds up development cycles.
Standards Compliance: Aids in adhering to best practices.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and automotive, SonarQube is leveraged for static code analysis, automating code inspections, and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. Teams integrate it into their CI/CD pipelines to maintain high-quality code, identify security vulnerabilities, and enhance code maintainability.

SonarSource Sàrl

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Snowflake, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

February 2026

Free Report: SonarQube vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarQube vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SonarQube vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.