HPE Wireless WAN Reviews

We primarily use the solution for wireless connectivity.

We are working in an integrated company in Turkey and lots of projects that we are working on are using this product.

The initial setup is simple if you do a proper rollout and explain everything to the client.

The product is quite stable.

We've found the scalability to be good.

The technical support team has been quite helpful and responsive.

Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing.

It would be ideal if they developed more industrial synergies on the market.

I've used the solution for a number of years. It's easily been over ten. I've used it for quite a while. 

The stability of the solution is quite good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The product can scale. If you are a company that needs to expand, you can do so.

We have a big technical team in our company. Lots of our engineers have Aruba certification, for example. They are well trained. However, when and if we need to reach out directly to Aruba about HPE Wireless, their team is quick to respond and very knowledgeable. They have been great and we are satisfied with their level of service. 

I am using both Huawei Wireless and HP Wireless WAN. We also use Cisco.

The initial setup can be complex, however, if you organize everything beforehand, it can be quite straightforward. 

Its pricing is not the best price on the market as Huawei and Ubiquiti are cheaper. The Aruba technology is comparable to Cisco. When we compare the prices to Cisco, they have better pricing on projects. Huawei prices are cheaper than the Cisco and Aruba however, if the Aruba sales team supports us, they can get us the best price for the project.

We're a partner. We help clients install this product into their environments.

Mostly, we use the private cloud in Turkey, however, often hybrid deployments are also used. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. For the most part, we are quite satisfied with the capabilities and the level of service we are provided. 

We use the HPE Wireless WAN as part of our overall networking solution.

The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility.

I have been using this solution for approximately five years.

I have never had an issue with stability.

The solution is scalable.

At the height of our daily usage, there are approximately 500 users.

I have previously used Aruba and Cisco solutions.

The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it.

I used an internal team of two that does the implementation of the solutions.

The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month.

I recommend this solution to others.

I rate HPE Wireless WAN an eight out of ten.

This solution is used for network access with updated features.

The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable. They are able to provide many different types of EPS in different situations, such as indoor and outdoor. Additionally, they provide a higher level of services compared to other solutions.

In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms.

I have been using this solution for approximately two years.

I find the solution stable. 

The solution is scalable. We have more than 100 customers using it.

The support of the solution is great and we are very satisfied with it.

The installation of the solution was very simple and took only a couple of minutes. 

We have approximately 15 administrators for the deployments and maintenance.

There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract.

I rate HPE Wireless WAN a ten out of ten. 

We primarily use this solution to back up everything and we use it for sharing files.

It's easy to use.

The initial setup could be simplified. 

The integration with Microsoft could be improved.

The scalability and the support could be better.

I have been using this solution for 18 months.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable solution.

I wouldn't say that this solution is massively scalable. The scalability could be improved.

We have 24 users in our organization.

In the foreseeable future, we have plans to continue using this solution.

Technical support is appalling.

The initial setup was very complex. There were many problems integrating with Microsoft.

It took a good few weeks to deploy.

We had the help of a consultant.

We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product.

I would not recommend this solution to others because of the initial issues.

Because of the issues with the installation and the integration, I would rate this solution a two out of ten.

I use this solution for communication inside my office.

The performance is good.

It is easy to use.

I would like for it to be faster. It should be a faster device.

I have been using this solution for two years.

The version that I am using is two years old.

It's quite stable. I have not experienced any issues.

It's a scalable product. We have 63 users in our organization.

At this point, we have plans to continue using it but that can change within the next five years.

I have not contacted technical support. It is handled by a different department, but they are customer-friendly and knowledgeable.

Previously, I was not using another solution.

It was approximately a week before we could start to use it.

The solution was installed through the service provider.

I find the price to be reasonable.

We have to pay the licensing fees but it comes with a five warranty.

I am in a position where I can recommend this solution. I am just an end-user, I don't have enough experience.

I would rate HPE Wireless WAN a seven out of ten.

We are using HPE Wireless WAN in hospitals and governments to serve the network connection to devices, such as phones.

The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability.

The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced.

I have been using HPE Wireless WAN for approximately eight years.

HPE Wireless WAN is highly stable.

We have approximately 200 devices connected to the solution.

The solution is very effective and because of this, I have never had to open up a ticket to support.

The setup of HPE Wireless WAN is not complex. It took us approximately one month to deploy the solution with 200 devices.

The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high.

I rate HPE Wireless WAN a nine out of ten.