We use the HPE Wireless WAN as part of our overall networking solution.
Network Administrator at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees
Flexible, easy to install, and reliable
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
- "The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for approximately five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have never had an issue with stability.
Buyer's Guide
Wireless WAN
June 2025

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: June 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
At the height of our daily usage, there are approximately 500 users.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have previously used Aruba and Cisco solutions.
How was the initial setup?
The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it.
What about the implementation team?
I used an internal team of two that does the implementation of the solutions.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend this solution to others.
I rate HPE Wireless WAN an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Head of IT Network Division at Panorinformatika
Supports latest technology, highly reliable, and provides helpful technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
- "In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
What is our primary use case?
This solution is used for network access with updated features.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable. They are able to provide many different types of EPS in different situations, such as indoor and outdoor. Additionally, they provide a higher level of services compared to other solutions.
What needs improvement?
In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for approximately two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I find the solution stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. We have more than 100 customers using it.
How are customer service and technical support?
The support of the solution is great and we are very satisfied with it.
How was the initial setup?
The installation of the solution was very simple and took only a couple of minutes.
What about the implementation team?
We have approximately 15 administrators for the deployments and maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract.
What other advice do I have?
I rate HPE Wireless WAN a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator
Buyer's Guide
Wireless WAN
June 2025

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: June 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Insolvency Practitioner and Director at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Complex to setup, doesn't integrate well with Microsoft, and the technical support is appalling
Pros and Cons
- "It's easy to use."
- "The scalability and the support could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use this solution to back up everything and we use it for sharing files.
What is most valuable?
It's easy to use.
What needs improvement?
The initial setup could be simplified.
The integration with Microsoft could be improved.
The scalability and the support could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for 18 months.
We are using the latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I wouldn't say that this solution is massively scalable. The scalability could be improved.
We have 24 users in our organization.
In the foreseeable future, we have plans to continue using this solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is appalling.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very complex. There were many problems integrating with Microsoft.
It took a good few weeks to deploy.
What about the implementation team?
We had the help of a consultant.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product.
What other advice do I have?
I would not recommend this solution to others because of the initial issues.
Because of the issues with the installation and the integration, I would rate this solution a two out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Good performance, robust, easy to use, but it could be faster
Pros and Cons
- "The performance is good."
- "It should be a faster device."
What is our primary use case?
I use this solution for communication inside my office.
What is most valuable?
The performance is good.
It is easy to use.
What needs improvement?
I would like for it to be faster. It should be a faster device.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for two years.
The version that I am using is two years old.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's quite stable. I have not experienced any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a scalable product. We have 63 users in our organization.
At this point, we have plans to continue using it but that can change within the next five years.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have not contacted technical support. It is handled by a different department, but they are customer-friendly and knowledgeable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, I was not using another solution.
How was the initial setup?
It was approximately a week before we could start to use it.
What about the implementation team?
The solution was installed through the service provider.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I find the price to be reasonable.
We have to pay the licensing fees but it comes with a five warranty.
What other advice do I have?
I am in a position where I can recommend this solution. I am just an end-user, I don't have enough experience.
I would rate HPE Wireless WAN a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Managing Director at P & P Enterprise Solution Co.,Ltd.
High quality, plenty of features, and simple setup
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
- "The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
What is our primary use case?
We are using HPE Wireless WAN in hospitals and governments to serve the network connection to devices, such as phones.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability.
What needs improvement?
The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using HPE Wireless WAN for approximately eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
HPE Wireless WAN is highly stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have approximately 200 devices connected to the solution.
How are customer service and support?
The solution is very effective and because of this, I have never had to open up a ticket to support.
How was the initial setup?
The setup of HPE Wireless WAN is not complex. It took us approximately one month to deploy the solution with 200 devices.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high.
What other advice do I have?
I rate HPE Wireless WAN a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Wireless WAN Report and find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, and more!
Updated: June 2025
Product Categories
Wireless WANPopular Comparisons
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Wireless WAN Report and find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, and more!
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions: