HPE Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Ruckus are both solutions in the Wireless WAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ruckus is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.6% mindshare in Wireless WAN, compared to Ruckus’s 25.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

HPE Wireless WAN

Read 22 HPE Wireless WAN reviews

442 Views
438 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Ruckus Wireless WAN

Read 58 Ruckus Wireless WAN reviews

2,213 Views
2,124 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

HPE Wireless WAN

Ruckus Wireless WAN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN are competitors in the wireless networking market, each offering unique strengths. HPE Wireless WAN holds an edge with its robust features and competitive pricing, whereas Ruckus distinguishes itself with versatile deployment options and strong support, making it an attractive long-term choice.

Features: HPE Wireless WAN is noted for its advanced network management capabilities, integrated security solutions, and strong performance in complex environments. Ruckus Wireless WAN offers high-performance access points, adaptive antenna technology, and reliable connectivity, focusing on hardware innovation and dependable performance.

Room for Improvement: HPE Wireless WAN could enhance its deployment ease for non-enterprise environments and optimize its hardware for broader use cases. Ruckus Wireless WAN might work on reducing initial setup costs, improving integration with third-party platforms, and expanding its feature set to accommodate emerging technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ruckus Wireless WAN simplifies deployment with intuitive tools, ensuring ease of setup even in large setups, and offers responsive customer service. HPE Wireless WAN also supports straightforward deployment but is more tailored to enterprise scenarios, requiring expert intervention at times, coupled with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Wireless WAN provides competitive pricing, emphasizing value-rich solutions for enterprise clients, with an enhanced ROI through comprehensive features and long-term support. Ruckus Wireless WAN, with potentially higher startup costs, ensures significant ROI with enduring hardware performance and reduced operational disruptions, making it worth the investment for organizations seeking steady network performance.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Wireless WAN

Ranking in Wireless WAN

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ruckus Wireless WAN

Ranking in Wireless WAN

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 3.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 25.0%, down from 38.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ruckus Wireless WAN	25.0%
HPE Wireless WAN	3.6%
Other	71.4%

Wireless WAN

Featured Reviews

DineshDas

Manager - Network Services at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized features have simplified deployment and improved day-to-day network management

One of the best features of HPE Wireless WAN is Wi-Fi Direct, as it provides dual-band frequency and helps to connect Bluetooth with IoT devices. I am comfortable with this feature and find it beneficial for connectivity. I use centralized management features such as WLC. They have improved operational efficiency significantly. It is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites. This makes it easy to implement policies across the network. I see measurable benefits from this centralized solution, which is quite easy to handle as people are comfortable managing the tool. Users do not need hardcore technical expertise to operate it on a day-to-day basis, making it quite comfortable.

Read full review

Nadeem Nasir

IT Manager at Handi Quilter, Inc.

Reliable Wi-Fi deployment handles extreme conditions and reduces maintenance

The only bad downside to Ruckus Wireless WAN is that the guest network is poorly conceived. This is a known issue. There are ways to make the guest network work reliably, but not as promised. That's the only downside to Ruckus Wireless WAN access points - they have a weak guest system and guest portal, but everything else is the best of the best. If I did not have access to Ruckus Wireless WAN support, I think I would have failed. One downside they have now is that you no longer have access to the support folks without a contract. That has changed over many years. That would be really unfortunate because I remember struggling. The company was very hungry at that point and they were very willing to help. Now support requires a contract. That comes with all growing companies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."

"It's easy to use."

"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."

"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."

"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."

"The most important is that the solution is stable."

"HP Wireless offers competitive pricing compared to Cisco and Fortinet."

More HPE Wireless WAN pros

"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."

"Ruckus Wireless WAN’s most valuable feature is unleashed."

"The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the antenna technology."

"One of the best features of Ruckus Wireless WAN that customers are interested in is the adaptive antenna called BeamFlex. Ruckus Wireless WAN also has the best management platform, and even if there are thousands of users of the solution, it's very easy to manage on Ruckus Wireless WAN. It can also support third-party equipment. It's an all-in-one solution and it has IoT and secure access capabilities. Upgrading the network to Ruckus Wireless WAN is also easy."

"The performance is very nice, the throughput is better than any other product, and it's reliable."

"Ruckus Wireless WAN's best feature is its virtual controller."

"We found the technical support to be helpful."

"Having all the management tools in a cloud-based solution has been valuable, eliminating the need to deploy and manage an on-premises controller."

More Ruckus Wireless WAN pros

Cons

"Integration might be improved, particularly with a single sign-on for Active Directory."

"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."

"The scalability and the support could be better."

"HPE should improve performance and stability."

"It should be a faster device."

"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."

"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."

"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."

More HPE Wireless WAN cons

"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."

"The initial setup is complex."

"Ruckus Wireless WAN is overpriced. Compared to others at the moment, Ruckus Wireless WAN does not have many valuable features."

"I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus, but are aware of other competitors."

"I would like to see the billing system improved by adding a billing system integration."

"It would be nice to some analytical features built into this solution."

"Technical support is something that needs to be improved."

"The license model offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Ruckus Wireless WAN cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I find the price to be reasonable."

"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."

"If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."

"Customers pay for HPE Wireless WAN based on the contract. It's usually paid yearly. There's an additional cost, particularly for the hardware."

"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."

"We have been satisfied with the price."

"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."

"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."

More HPE Wireless WAN pricing and cost advice

"The cost of licensing varies."

"It possesses a favorable balance between quality and price."

"The cost is quite high, and over the past year, there has been a substantial increase, nearly reaching around seventy percent."

"The product is available at a very good price, but it is not cheap compared to tools like Unifi. I believe it is a very good product for the price that it is offered to users."

"The solution is a little pricey, so customers sometimes select other products because of the price."

"The product has competitive pricing."

"The solution is very competitively priced."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

More Ruckus Wireless WAN pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Wireless WAN?

The tool is easy to manage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Wireless WAN?

The price is compatible and not an issue for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?

I am not in a position to fully address what can be improved for HPE Wireless WAN currently. However, there are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features...

See all answers

Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?

Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?

These are not cheap access points. If you want to go cheap, Ubiquiti is an option. I knew they were worth it because once deployed, they wouldn't require additional attention. They're not at Cisco ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Wireless WAN?

Ruckus Wireless WAN is overpriced. Compared to others at the moment, Ruckus Wireless WAN does not have many valuable features. Compared to everyone else, everyone else comes self-hosted, either wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ubiquiti Wireless vs HPE Wireless WAN

Compared 46% of the time

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs HPE Wireless WAN

Compared 26% of the time

More HPE Wireless WAN Competitors

Ubiquiti Wireless vs Ruckus Wireless WAN

Compared 69% of the time

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN

Compared 11% of the time

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN

Compared 5% of the time

More Ruckus Wireless WAN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Wireless WAN

January 2026

Download HPE Wireless WAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Wireless WAN

January 2026

Download Ruckus Wireless WAN product report

Also Known As

Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN

No data available

Overview

HPE Wireless WAN, a Software-Defined WAN dynamically selects the best path for each app based on policies and real-time network measurements. Flexibly and securely connect users to apps with higher visibility into vital traffic. WAN Portfolio include the following: HPE OfficeConnect OC20 802.11ac Series Access Points, HPE FlexNetwork MSR2000 Router Series, HPE FlexNetwork HSR6800 Router Series and HPE FlexNetwork VSR1000 Virtual Services Router Series.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Ruckus Wireless’s WAN (Wide Area Network) suite of switches and solutions provides companies and organizations with a wide variety of products that enable them to deploy and manage the kinds of WANs that best meet their needs. Ruckus Wireless is a leader in the field of WAN creation, deployment, and management. Their solutions are designed with the user in mind. They are sleek products and solutions that are easy for administrators to use and maintain. This makes it a valuable suite for any and every kind of industry. The level of ease that it provides makes it possible for companies and organizations to reap a high level of benefit from whichever product they choose to use.

Ruckus Wireless WAN Benefits

Some of the benefits of using the Ruckus Wireless WAN suite of switches and solutions include:

Simplified network deployment and management. Ruckus Wireless WAN uses Campus Fabric technology to create a streamlined network creation and management process. This technology takes many of the processes used to create and manage networks that usually require many different solutions and combines them so that a single solution can accomplish the same amount of work.

The ability to operate on a massive scale. The Ruckus Wireless SmartZone 100 solution gives administrators the power to handle 1,024 access points and 25,000 users from a single device. Companies can operate at a high level with fewer devices than their competitors require to accomplish a similar level of work.

Ease of use. Solutions like RuckusZoneDirector 1200 can be easily deployed and used by administrators who may not have a background in the use of wireless solutions. Companies that choose Ruckus Wireless WAN do not need to train administrators to deploy it. This makes it extremely valuable to companies looking to keep their budgets to a minimum.

Ruckus Wireless WAN Features

Organizations that choose to use the Ruckus Wireless WAN suite of switches and solutions have a large number of capabilities from which they can choose.

Centralized network management. Ruckus Wireless WAN’s RUCKUS Network Director feature enables administrators to manage their networks from a single location. All of the controls and data that users need to monitor and control the network can be managed from one interface.

Advanced security features. Ruckus Wireless WAN has the capability to encrypt and demand that traffic that is trying to pass through the network be authenticated before it is allowed access. This protects the data that leaves the network and the network itself.
Seamless interoperability. The various solutions and products that make up Ruckus Wireless’s WAN solution suite have the ability to integrate and operate together seamlessly. Users can mix and match solution pieces to best fit their needs.

Reviews from Real Users

Ruckus Wireless’s WAN suite is a truly versatile selection of solutions that offer users a complete package of capabilities and features. This suite makes it possible for users to meet all of their networking needs. Their wireless access points are the kind that is mostly employed in industries like resorts, which have to cater to large volumes of people over extended periods of time. They provide companies with the highest possible level of coverage. Users working in any number of fields would find Ruckus Wireless to be up to the task of handling their networking needs. This suite is appropriate for large corporations and small businesses alikes.

An information technology project manager at a university writes, “The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful. We get very good coverage from just one access point. The throughput is very good and the centralized management is excellent. Also, the ease of deployment is very good.”

A video conferencing administrator at a technology services company states, “The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses.”

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Bell Canada

American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School

Buyer's Guide

HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN

February 2026

Free Report: HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.

See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.