Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
9.0
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN delivers quick ROI, significantly boosts efficiency through automation, and is highly valued by users.
Sentiment score
6.6
Users achieved significant ROI with Ruckus Wireless WAN over several years, noting cost savings and extended replacement cycles.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Cambium Networks offers effective customer service with quick responses, though some seek better efficiency and more resources like video tutorials.
Sentiment score
6.5
Ruckus Wireless WAN support is responsive and efficient, though initial contact expertise and escalation process need improvement.
Their technical support is excellent.
When we seek support, the service we expect is not promptly delivered, which can be time-consuming.
They would thoroughly troubleshoot issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is praised for scalability in diverse setups despite reduced indoor flexibility and performance changes with growth.
Sentiment score
7.7
Ruckus Wireless WAN offers scalable, flexible solutions for diverse deployment sizes, with manageable costs and extensive industry applications.
I find the scalability quite good, with a rating of eight out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is praised for reliability and performance, despite minor streaming issues in rural areas on 2.4 GHz.
Sentiment score
8.2
Ruckus Wireless WAN is praised for stability and reliability, despite occasional hardware issues needing cautious complex environment deployment.
 

Room For Improvement

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN needs improved usability, extended range, stability, enhanced security, better support, and robust design for demanding environments.
Ruckus Wireless WAN requires pricing, documentation, support improvements, expanded features, better usability, and adaptation to market demands.
Customer support for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN in our country is very poor.
Although the development of high throughput radios is ongoing, due to government of India licensing issues, the deployment is affected.
There seems to be no visible improvement in the Gartner positioning, which is crucial even as companies like Huawei are also entering the wireless sector.
 

Setup Cost

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is mid-range priced, no licensing fees, perceived costly in some regions, with variable hardware costs.
Ruckus Wireless WAN pricing varies, seen as valuable yet expensive compared to alternatives, with cost differences by region and packages.
The price is always on the higher side, which impacts the perception of return on investment.
 

Valuable Features

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN provides excellent performance, user-friendly setup, cost-effectiveness, and strong features for coverage, scalability, and reliability.
Ruckus Wireless WAN offers high performance, easy management, excellent coverage, and unique features, competing effectively with Cisco and Aruba.
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN doesn't require any additional purchases, which is a significant advantage.
The uptime and reliability of the product are also excellent.
The most valuable features are the advanced technologies like BeamFlex, which make a significant difference.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ruckus Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is 11.9%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Wireless WAN is 35.6%, down from 36.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Amimul Ehsan - PeerSpot reviewer
Deployment meets needs with simple setup while improving customer support
We have deployed FortiGate 200F and 600E firewalls. The 600E was installed four years ago and is still running, and we deployed another 200F last year. We are continually adding base stations and wireless APs across our company network. For new users, there is a learning curve regarding installation, IP configuration, and technical issues. Since we have been using it since 2018, troubleshooting is not difficult for us. We have a server on premises that controls all the APs across our company. We have approximately 400 to 500 WiFi users across our company. We are not currently considering a different solution as it would require extra investment, which would cost too much for us now. I would rate Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a seven out of ten. Overall review rating: 5/10
Udit Narayan - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement
In Cisco, there is a configuration where it automatically switches from the 2.4 GHz to 5.2 GHz frequency. But with Ruckus, usually, we need to manually define whether we want to use the 2.4 GHz or 5.2 GHz. Another point is that its penetration power is low when we are using it in any location with more walls, as the signal strength diminishes. So, the signal strength and the penetration power of the signal should be improved. It is not like Cisco. We are using Cisco APs also, but Cisco APs perform better when we compare them with Ruckus. In future releases, I would like to see automatic switching between 2.4 GHz and 5.2 GHz frequencies. We should not have to set it manually. It should automatically change its frequency based on the load. For example, if the number of users increases, then its frequency should change automatically, switching to the less congested band.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
What do you like most about Cambium?
The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller.
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
What do you like most about Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Wireless WAN?
The price is always on the higher side, which impacts the perception of return on investment.
 

Also Known As

Cambium PMP Series, Cambium ePMP Series
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wireless Etc, Agricultural Technology Company in Brazil, Redfox, SKYNET, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPLEBEE’S
American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.