Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs Cisco Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is 12.6%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Wireless WAN is 2.8%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Arup Kumar Koley - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable performance and long-distance coverage enhance connectivity
We have been associated with Cambium since its days as a Motorola product, for more than 20 years. The solution offers excellent product performance, long-distance coverage, and link reliability. No nearby product is available for distance and performance that can compete with Cambium. The uptime and reliability of the product are also excellent.
LalanChowdhury - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances network reliability, offers device longevity and offers open authentication
The device longevity is a factor. enhances network reliability. Specifically, the handoff feature for WAN, when a customer moves from one access point to another in a building or office, is much easier and more reliable if it's controller-based. So, in those cases, we recommend the traditional controller-based solution. Cisco is adding AI features; they've already started in SD-WAN. But in Bangladesh, people are still new to AI. Cisco is including AI capabilities in their devices, so people are gradually adopting them. If they need AI-driven devices for industrial purposes, they can use them. So, Cisco is forward-thinking with these features. Even though they're not being used extensively now, they may be used in the future for things like RFID or automation. That's why Cisco's solution is logical and adaptable.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"Technical support has been good."
"The pricing of the product is very, very reasonable."
"Cambium Networks' PowerMax feature has been particularly beneficial for WAN connectivity, offering superior coverage compared to other solutions. The standout feature of Cambium Networks for me is its extensive coverage area."
"The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
"It eliminates the need for additional controllers, reducing costs."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"Technical support was helpful."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Our most valuable feature involves the 802.11ac, which operates at a very high level and has updated technology."
"The access points and controllers are good."
"Provides good visibility and insights into what is happening."
"The security and the capabilities of the platform are the most valuable features."
"I like that it has integrated the cost of our network access."
"Our university has experienced a positive return on investment, and I believe Cisco Wireless WAN will continue to benefit us for at least a decade."
 

Cons

"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"The solution's documentation should be made better and easily accessible to users."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"More high bandwidth is required. A more high throughput radio is necessary."
"The technical scalability is easy, but the license scalability is quite tricky."
"I think that we need more information or more help from partners to assess what model is correct for this environment."
"We cannot use wireless for the servers due to potential performance issues. They must be connected via fiber."
"A lot of the time, for users, it comes down to pricing. Many would like to see it be a bit less costly."
"It can be complex to set up."
"We would like to have the lead times improved."
"The product could be improved by making installing the operating system on access points easier."
"The setup of Cisco Wireless WAN needs an expert. You need someone with experience to be able to work with Cisco Wireless solutions. It took approximately one to two weeks to implement the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's licensing cost depends on the number of nodes."
"I rate the product’s pricing a two out of ten."
"There are no licensing fees, it's a one-time cost."
"The licensing part of the solution is not very expensive."
"Its price is in the middle range."
"It is expensive."
"There are not any licenses needed to use Cambium."
"When it comes to licensing costs we have been using the Cambium devices on a trial basis."
"On the low end, the solution costs probably around $1200 to $1300 for five years. It's an expensive product."
"The pricing is good."
"The price of Cisco Wireless WAN could improve upon pricing, it is expensive. We purchased the hardware through a vendor that Cisco used and we received approximately 75 percent off."
"Cisco is more expensive than other solutions."
"The price is expensive."
"The price is too high. The licensing is on a yearly basis."
"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"The price could be better, but it's been okay. You must pay license fees for each access point connected to the controller."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
What do you like most about Cambium?
The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller.
What do you like most about Cisco Wireless WAN?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Wireless WAN?
The price point is the main challenge as it seems complicated and unclear. We pay a premium for features we do not use.
What needs improvement with Cisco Wireless WAN?
The graphical user interface is okay, however, the CLI type is not very user-friendly. The GUI is okay, yet it needs more strength in the CLI mode as well. Sometimes, issues are not fully addressed...
 

Also Known As

Cambium PMP Series, Cambium ePMP Series
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wireless Etc, Agricultural Technology Company in Brazil, Redfox, SKYNET, HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPLEBEE’S
Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.