Top 10 Cisco Wireless WAN Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco

4.1 out of 5

75 reviews
90% willing to recommend

Top Cisco Wireless WAN Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Wireless WAN based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Ubiquiti Wireless, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, and Fortinet FortiExtender. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Cisco Wireless WAN surpasses its competitors by offering seamless connectivity, robust security, and enhanced network performance that adapts to innovative technologies, ensuring reliable and scalable wireless communication solutions for businesses to thrive in a dynamic environment.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Ubiquiti Wireless

4.0 out of 5

Ubiquiti Wireless

4.0 out of 5

Cisco Wireless WAN excels in high-traffic management and advanced capabilities, ideal for enterprises needing seamless Cisco integration. In comparison, Ubiquiti Wireless offers affordability and easy management, suitable for small to medium businesses seeking user-friendly interfaces and effective device control without additional licensing fees.

Download Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless Report

Pricing

Cisco Wireless WAN has higher setup costs compared to Ubiquiti Wireless, which offers a more budget-friendly option with reduced initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Wireless WAN has higher setup costs compared to Ubiquiti Wireless, which offers a more budget-friendly option with reduced initial expenses.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN

4.2 out of 5

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN

4.2 out of 5

Cisco Wireless WAN provides advanced features with seamless integration within its ecosystem for complex environments. In comparison, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN offers affordability and user-friendly deployment. A tech buyer may choose Cisco for integration or Cambium for cost-effectiveness.

Download Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Wireless WAN Report

Pricing

Cisco Wireless WAN involves higher setup costs compared to Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, highlighting a significant difference in affordability. Cambium's cost-effective pricing may appeal to budget-conscious users seeking a wireless WAN solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiExtender

4.3 out of 5

Fortinet FortiExtender

4.3 out of 5

Cisco Wireless WAN offers stability and support for high-speed environments, making it suitable for large networks needing extensive device connectivity. In comparison, Fortinet FortiExtender's strength lies in seamless SD-WAN integration, providing flexibility and interoperability with various network solutions.

Download Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Fortinet FortiExtender Report

Pricing

Cisco Wireless WAN offers a high initial setup cost, contrasting with Fortinet FortiExtender's cost-effective installation, highlighting significant differences in initial expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Wireless WAN offers a high initial setup cost, contrasting with Fortinet FortiExtender's cost-effective installation, highlighting significant differences in initial expenditure.

Related categories

Wireless WAN