

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ruckus, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN.
I would rate Cisco support a 10, as the response time and process via the dashboard are easy, and response times are always within the SLA.
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system.
When we seek support, the service we expect is not promptly delivered, which can be time-consuming.
They would thoroughly troubleshoot issues.
Response time could be better, mainly.
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
I find the scalability quite good, with a rating of eight out of ten.
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
The solution supports Wi-Fi 6.
Some of the newer models of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN access point have encompassed the new wireless protocols and increased the strength of their antennas.
Ruckus Wireless WAN could add a full stack to their product to make it more competitive, as they do not have security and they do not have their own cloud.
There seems to be no visible improvement in the Gartner positioning, which is crucial even as companies like Huawei are also entering the wireless sector.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
The pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is not competitive enough for the SMB market compared to other brands.
My experience with the pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is competitive with other providers offering paid subscriptions.
The price is always on the higher side, which impacts the perception of return on investment.
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has helped optimize network traffic very effectively, as we do prioritization for streaming and web conferencing apps, resulting in a clear, visible improvement in performance.
All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard.
The most valuable features are the advanced technologies like BeamFlex, which make a significant difference.
Ruckus Wireless WAN appears to perform better in less than optimal situations.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN | 9.3% |
| Aruba Wireless | 12.3% |
| Ruckus Wireless | 10.8% |
| Other | 67.6% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Ruckus Wireless WAN | 20.1% |
| Ubiquiti Wireless | 25.8% |
| Aruba Networks Wireless WAN | 11.4% |
| Other | 42.699999999999996% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 35 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.
What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.
Ruckus Wireless WAN delivers reliable and performant connectivity through its advanced antenna technology and simplified management. Its ease of deployment and scalability suit high-density environments, making it ideal for carriers and enterprises.
Ruckus Wireless WAN, known for its BeamFlex antenna technology, enhances signal quality and provides strong coverage. Simplified management through a virtual controller and a user-friendly configuration enable centralized control. Adaptive antennas deliver reliable performance, suitable for demanding environments like schools, airports, and hotels. It's highly valued for its seamless roaming and robust analytics, providing insights critical for network optimization. However, improvements in price structure, signal strength, and technical support are needed to better compete in the market. Issues like high costs, limited analytics, and slow problem resolution are areas of concern for users, alongside calls for a more flexible licensing approach.
What features stand out in Ruckus Wireless WAN?Ruckus Wireless WAN is extensively used in industries such as hospitality, healthcare, and education, providing Wi-Fi connectivity in high-density areas. Its integration with existing infrastructure is crucial for enterprises managing multiple access points. Carriers and government entities rely on it for robust network management, offering an alternative to traditional wired solutions. Companies in varied sectors utilize it for guest and operational Wi-Fi, supporting their connectivity needs effectively.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.