No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ubiquiti Wireless comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
2.3
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers cost-effective features appealing to businesses, with varying ROI based on usage and initial costs.
Sentiment score
6.3
Ubiquiti Wireless users report long-lasting equipment with minimal maintenance, though some suggest improvements and additional user controls.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.2
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN support is generally reliable, though users experience mixed accessibility and response times, prompting improvement calls.
Sentiment score
5.2
Ubiquiti Wireless support varies, relying on email and forums; lacks phone support, leading to mixed user experiences.
I would rate Cisco support a 10, as the response time and process via the dashboard are easy, and response times are always within the SLA.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system.
Senior Network Architect at Previder
The main concern is about response time rather than technical expertise or experience.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
I didn't have any issues with Ubiquiti support.
Systems and networks manager at Botanic-Serres Du Saleve, SAS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
4.9
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides scalable solutions for diverse needs but may face challenges due to licensing and cost considerations.
Sentiment score
7.5
Ubiquiti Wireless excels in scalability and centralized management, ideal for small to medium businesses expanding their network infrastructure.
I can add devices to my inventory and assign them to a new network, and it is for the most part automated and fairly quick.
Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
Ubiquiti Wireless offers large scalability, which is very important for our company as we have multiple sites that need to be interconnected and managed effectively.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
We primarily use them for switching and Wi-Fi solutions.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.1
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is stable and reliable, handling high loads well, with minor issues during updates or peak hours.
Sentiment score
7.3
Ubiquiti Wireless is praised for its stable, reliable performance, with occasional connectivity issues noted in crowded areas.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees
Ubiquiti Wireless is rated ten out of ten for stability.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN faces challenges with licensing costs, technical support, scalability, security, integration, and performance improvements.
Ubiquiti Wireless lacks advanced features, scalability, and support, facing issues with usability, integration, durability, and supply chain.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
I believe Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN can be improved by implementing enhancements to the Cisco AI assistant.
Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution supports Wi-Fi 6.
Senior Network Architect at Previder
Enterprise users require more details and options.
Head of IT at RD Tech
When implementing Wi-Fi for a campus, we use Cisco for the core backbone infrastructure, while implementing Ubiquiti Wireless for the Wi-Fi and controller.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
The firewall configuration also requires significant effort and could be improved for ease of use.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers high-quality features but is considered expensive, with licensing costs being a significant concern.
Ubiquiti Wireless is praised for its affordability and no licensing fees, making it ideal for small to medium businesses.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees
It would be more competitive if Meraki would consider reducing the price or extending SD-WAN features to wireless devices.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
My experience with the pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is competitive with other providers offering paid subscriptions.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
Ubiquiti Wireless is cheaper.
Systems and networks manager at Botanic-Serres Du Saleve, SAS
The equipment is priced relatively high, though the value it provides makes it worth the cost.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
Ubiquiti Wireless is quite affordable, making it accessible for smaller companies.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
 

Valuable Features

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN excels in ease of deployment, cloud management, robust security, remote management, and user-friendly interface.
Ubiquiti Wireless excels in setup, management, performance, and security, offering scalable, affordable solutions with robust coverage and intuitive use.
The capability to configure network policies remotely is the most important aspect for our organization, as we are an MSP providing remote support for all our clients.
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk
When I am troubleshooting wireless connections, I have access to detailed client statistics regarding disconnects, RF channel information, and other relevant data.
Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The integration of Ubiquiti Wireless with other Ubiquiti products in the setup is seamless and perfect.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
All the access points provide good connectivity and are reliable.
Head of IT at RD Tech
Since implementing Ubiquiti Wireless, I have seen improvements in connection security, wireless speed, and overall network stability.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
123
Ranking in other categories
Wireless LAN (4th)
Ubiquiti Wireless
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
Wireless WAN (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Enterprise Networking solutions, they serve different purposes. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is designed for Wireless LAN and holds a mindshare of 9.7%, down 12.6% compared to last year.
Ubiquiti Wireless, on the other hand, focuses on Wireless WAN, holds 24.5% mindshare, down 39.7% since last year.
Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN9.7%
Aruba Wireless12.7%
Ruckus Wireless10.5%
Other67.1%
Wireless LAN
Wireless WAN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ubiquiti Wireless24.5%
Ruckus Wireless WAN18.4%
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN12.1%
Other45.0%
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

DolfKrikke - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Architect at Previder
Centralized management has simplified remote branch control and improved network visibility
Cisco Meraki Wireless is very powerful and very easy to manage. The solution is also integrating Cisco Catalyst Wireless products into their portfolio, and they are managing the Catalyst switches as well. The seamless roaming capabilities function well. I monitor network performance with Meraki's real-time analytics. The most useful metrics to my team are the internet performance metrics, as there is a lot of information in the dashboard that I can access. All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard. When I need to apply to compliance requirements or other regulatory needs, I can have my auditing in one place, which is an advantage. I use Cisco Meraki Wireless's Layer 7 application traffic shaping with the MX and the Meraki MX Firewalls.
Donald Ochanda - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
Seamless coverage amplifies connectivity while enhanced responsiveness strengthens potential
We do not prefer Ubiquiti Wireless switches for more complex environments, not because they lack scalability, but because we haven't explored their products extensively. We are strong on their Wi-Fi solution. When implementing Wi-Fi for a campus, we use Cisco for the core backbone infrastructure, while implementing Ubiquiti Wireless for the Wi-Fi and controller. Perhaps we haven't discovered switches that would match our requirements, or maybe they exist but we haven't explored their capabilities fully. Regarding improvements to Ubiquiti Wireless, I cannot provide specific suggestions as I'm not an expert on Wi-Fi, as there is a dedicated team that handles Wi-Fi solutions.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business70
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business48
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
Which is better - Ubiquiti Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless offers a wide range of WLAN products. We tested their devices before ultimately choosing Cisco Meraki. Ubiquiti devices have good outdoor performance and the connection is very st...
 

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
NASCAR Grand-AM, Maritime Parc, Outdoor Music Festival, British Armed Forces, Arcadia School District, Moscow - Enforta
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ruckus, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: June 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.