

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ubiquiti Wireless compete in the wireless networking category. Ubiquiti seems to have the upper hand based on its management flexibility and affordability, appealing to small businesses.
Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is recognized for its cloud-managed capabilities, centralized management dashboard, and high visibility. Users appreciate the ease of deployment and remote troubleshooting features. However, it lacks customization options for advanced users due to preset guardrails. Ubiquiti Wireless is valued for its ease of use, flexible management, and cost-effectiveness. It is especially attractive to small businesses and home users due to seamless integration and stable performance.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could improve in on-premises management, dashboard security, and enterprise-level features. The licensing policies and lack of advanced configuration options are also areas of concern. Ubiquiti Wireless would benefit from enhanced security features, better technical support, and improved integration with third-party systems. Users also seek more enterprise-grade functionalities for larger networks.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides versatility across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments, offering 24/7 technical support. Some users experience slow response times despite the detailed documentation. Ubiquiti Wireless is known for its easy installation and minimal ongoing costs, but its support is less extensive than Cisco's. Users desire more prompt assistance from Ubiquiti.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is positioned as a premium solution with higher costs and subscription-based licensing, causing concerns over total expenses. Despite high costs, enterprise users report substantial ROI through reduced resource needs. Ubiquiti Wireless stands out due to its straightforward cost structure and affordability, providing significant savings against competitors like Cisco, particularly for small and medium-sized businesses.
I would rate Cisco support a 10, as the response time and process via the dashboard are easy, and response times are always within the SLA.
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
There are some problems with their technical support when it comes to the whole Meraki system.
The main concern is about response time rather than technical expertise or experience.
I didn't have any issues with Ubiquiti support.
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
Ubiquiti Wireless offers large scalability, which is very important for our company as we have multiple sites that need to be interconnected and managed effectively.
We primarily use them for switching and Wi-Fi solutions.
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
Ubiquiti Wireless is rated ten out of ten for stability.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
Some of the newer models of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN access point have encompassed the new wireless protocols and increased the strength of their antennas.
The solution supports Wi-Fi 6.
Enterprise users require more details and options.
When implementing Wi-Fi for a campus, we use Cisco for the core backbone infrastructure, while implementing Ubiquiti Wireless for the Wi-Fi and controller.
The firewall configuration also requires significant effort and could be improved for ease of use.
The pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is not competitive enough for the SMB market compared to other brands.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
My experience with the pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is competitive with other providers offering paid subscriptions.
Ubiquiti Wireless is cheaper.
The equipment is priced relatively high, though the value it provides makes it worth the cost.
Ubiquiti Wireless is quite affordable, making it accessible for smaller companies.
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has helped optimize network traffic very effectively, as we do prioritization for streaming and web conferencing apps, resulting in a clear, visible improvement in performance.
All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard.
The integration of Ubiquiti Wireless with other Ubiquiti products in the setup is seamless and perfect.
All the access points provide good connectivity and are reliable.
Since implementing Ubiquiti Wireless, I have seen improvements in connection security, wireless speed, and overall network stability.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN | 9.3% |
| Aruba Wireless | 12.3% |
| Ruckus Wireless | 10.8% |
| Other | 67.6% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Ubiquiti Wireless | 25.8% |
| Ruckus Wireless WAN | 20.1% |
| Aruba Networks Wireless WAN | 11.4% |
| Other | 42.699999999999996% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 48 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.
What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.
Ubiquiti Wireless offers centralized network management with an easy setup and affordable pricing. It is reliable and user-friendly, providing stable and scalable performance suitable for SMEs.
Ubiquiti Wireless enhances network management by integrating access points effortlessly, ensuring secure and scalable connectivity. Although affordable and effective for SMEs, there are needs for improvement in security and support. The platform features dual-band options and interference suppression, but availability issues and limited enterprise-level features remain challenges. Outdoors, devices should be more rugged, and pricing as well as cloud management improvements are necessary.
What are the most important features of Ubiquiti Wireless?In industries such as hospitality, education, and small business, Ubiquiti Wireless facilitates connectivity in offices, homes, and industrial environments. Its strong signal coverage assists point-to-point communication and enables outdoor Wi-Fi. Its simplicity and affordability make it a practical choice over alternatives like Cisco for high-density areas and guest networks.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.