Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Juniper is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Cisco holds a 12.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Juniper’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Read 119 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews
  • 12,623 Views
  • 10,448 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...
Read 21 Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reviews
  • 5,471 Views
  • 4,374 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points both compete in the wireless networking category. Juniper Mist appears to hold a slight advantage due to its innovative AI-driven network management capabilities.

Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers centralized cloud-based management through its intuitive dashboard, making it accessible for organizations with limited IT resources. It provides robust security features such as Layer 7 protections and seamless remote deployment. Juniper Mist stands out with its AI-driven management capabilities powered by Marvis, facilitating superior troubleshooting and user insights. It also provides centralized monitoring and proactive network optimization through AI technology.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could improve in areas like support efficiency, pricing strategies, and enhanced API functionality for advanced routing and GDPR compliance. Juniper Mist could benefit from improvements in customer support response times and broader integration capabilities with third-party systems, as well as expanding its AI features to enhance competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Juniper Mist offer flexible deployment options across diverse cloud environments with commendable customer service. Cisco Meraki provides efficient support via its online dashboard but occasionally faces initial response delays. Juniper Mist is known for prompt support; however, some users suggest enhancing speed and efficiency further.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is perceived as a premium option with a licensing-based pricing model, considered expensive but justified by reduced operational costs and enhanced analytics. Juniper Mist is similarly positioned as a high-end solution, noted for its cost, yet offering justified ROI through its powerful AI functionalities and strong network performance insights.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ranking in Wireless LAN
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
119
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...
Ranking in Wireless LAN
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 12.3%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is 5.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

RezaPradipta - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamline network management with a unified dashboard for seamless device integration
The primary use case for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is mostly for enterprise wireless, including guest Wi-Fi and enterprise Wi-Fi. I use it across various industries with a focus on retail Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers a single pane of glass management. It only comes with a controller on the…
Read full review
Raihan Hossain - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistently manages user capacity and satisfaction with ease
I have completed over twenty projects using Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points ( /products/juniper-mist-wireless-access-points-reviews ), and I continue to see exceptional performance in the areas of user capacity, user experience, and user satisfaction. This makes Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points highly recommended if the customer's budget allows, as the hardware performance is also very good. From my perspective, the Juniper reporting logs are clear and provide necessary data, which supports better management and diagnosis.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The settings of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN can be very granular. You can lock down and block devices with the controls. For example, we have four different wireless settings, such as guest, employee, security, and backup. For example, the settings for the employees, if they use laptops, they're required to have certain settings, such as an antivirus installed. If they do not then Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN will not let them connect. This is very good protection because the network works on the bringing your own device(BYOD) principle. It's a BYOD environment now, and you also don't want them to bring infection into the environment because these people are connecting to the LAN via wireless connections. We have to be careful because we're managing it, we have to be very strict with regards to the rules and policies."
"The most valuable thing to me is the stability of the product."
"Meraki WLAN is easy to deploy, includes a cloud controller, and updates continuously. It also offers high visibility."
"Cloud management, wireless infrastructure, and implementation are all valuable features."
"The monitoring device enables you to see the network health."
"The tool's most valuable feature is report generation. Its dashboard helps me a lot with user analytics."
"The graphic user interface is very nice."
"The user interface is very simple and easy to use — our customers are very satisfied."
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The simplicity is great."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"I have completed over twenty projects using Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, and I continue to see exceptional performance in the areas of user capacity, user experience, and user satisfaction."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The solution is stable."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The product is quite user-friendly and easy to deploy, so one should definitely consider buying it."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pros
 

Cons

"The price could be slightly lowered to make it more competitive in the market."
"In some cases, they could include enhanced features in the product, such as a firewall console and traffic analysis."
"Its licensing can be better."
"If there are advanced features that you can have enabled, they should allow users access to that in an easier manner."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"The ease of use is average. It could be more user-friendly."
"Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's management tools need enhancement."
"Overall the solution needs to have more time to mature."
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons
"Juniper should make the products more affordable."
"The price could be better."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The reporting logs require improvement in terms of clarity because it can be difficult to find specific information about network influences."
"The solution is expensive."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is higher than other products. It is above the expectation of customers. So, every time we need to fight for a good price."
"The cost is not so much for Wireless LAN, but when you have to get the security license, it costs a lot."
"Cisco Meraki requires either a one year or three year license for a standard enterprise license."
"There are multiple licensing options including three months, six months, and one year."
"Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's pricing is high."
"The price of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could be improved, it is too expensive. We pay for the solution on an annual basis."
"The solution is overpriced and more expensive than Hauwei."
"We do a three-year or five-year license and support. Its price could be better, but overall, we get competitive prices. A lot of times, Cisco puts itself out of range, especially with Meraki. I've dealt with a lot of business development from Cisco, and they have always been accommodating, especially in dealing with hospitals or government. There is also a right time to buy it. July is when they are eager to sell a lot of things because that is the end of their calendar year."
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice
"The solution is expensive."
"If a customer has a budget of around five lakhs in Indian currency, they can afford Juniper products."
"The pricing is fair."
"We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point."
"Juniper Wireless AP's price is a little more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."
"I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive."
"The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
See all answers
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
See all answers
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
See all answers
What do you like most about Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The solution is very secure.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The price is very high, which is why not all enterprises can purchase this product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The reporting logs require improvement in terms of clarity because it can be difficult to find specific information about network influences.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 32% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 11% of the time
Ubiquiti Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Ubiquiti Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 6% of the time
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 5% of the time
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Compared 5% of the time
More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors
Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 21% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 16% of the time
Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 9% of the time
Fortinet FortiAP vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Fortinet FortiAP vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 6% of the time
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Logo
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Compared 5% of the time
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
June 2025
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reportDownload Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report
Buyer's Guide
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
June 2025
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reportDownload Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points product report
 

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points
 

Overview

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.
Cisco

Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

Juniper
 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
June 2025
Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.