Microsoft Visual Studio Reviews

We use Microsoft Visual Studio for application development and our customers.

I like the IDE or the integrated development environment. It's the best IDE.

IntelliSense could be better.

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio for 20 years.

Stability is excellent.

Scalability is excellent. We have about 15 developers using this solution in our organization.

The initial setup was straightforward. It took less than 30 minutes to implement this solution.

We deployed this solution in-house. 

We have received a return on our investment.

Licensing costs are reasonable. 

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Visual Studio a ten.

On-premises

We use the solution for development purposes.

The solution is a very good tool. I like the performance, stability and ease of use. 

I would like to see more tools in the next release. 

Since Microsoft Visual Studio comprises the core of Microsoft development, we have been making use of it for 15 years. 

I like the solution's stability. 

The technical support is fine. 

We have no need for deployment, as this can be handled by the individual user. 

The solution is a free tool.

The solution is deployed both on-premises and in the cloud. 

I cannot think of features which should be included in the next release, as they already upgrade the solution on their own. 

The solution is a very good product. There is no need for better integration. 

All of our customers use the solution. It is on a desktop application. We have around 40 developers.

I would definitely recommend the solution to others. 

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio as a nine out of ten. 

Creating web sites and APIs using Angular, jQuery, MVC, and Web API. Desktop and server side assets are primarily in C#, however I use it to edit older ASPX pages for web apps written in VB.NET.

It is an excellent IDE, but the corporate features are what set it apart. We use TFS for our scrums, which links our tasks to actual code changes.

Personally, in my job as a developer, the version control system has been very helpful. It is also flexible enough to let me use Git as well as its own version control mechanism.

It would be nice if Visual Studio's extensions and updates could self-correct, if they are not working or disabled, and also inform the user. Lately, for example, NuGet Package Manager has failed gracefully, but it did not say why. 

More than five years.

The Visual Studio IDE is excellent in design and function. It allows you to code for a wide variety of software, including web and platform software. It supports quite a few different programming languages. It also has a GUI based visual interface editor built in, which is easy to use and allows for quick turn around in prototyping software designs.There is a free "Express" version of the IDE software available as well.

.NET apps are only compatible with Windows Phone 8 and Windows platforms. Visual Basic.NET is the primary language that Visual Studio is targeted for. Also, the price for the IDE can be expensive.

Personally, I prefer using Visual Studio as it has the code auto-complete feature, which is really awesome if you've forgotten the name of the function or API that you are calling.

Visual Studio is a tool used for custom software development. It covers everything under this umbrella, including architecture for automation testing. We have between 60 and 70 users working with Visual Studio.

I've been using Microsoft Visual Studio for 10 years.

Visual Studio is stable enough. There have been some issues but not very often. 

Visual Studio is a development environment. It only runs on one computer. Everyone has their own installation. If we talk about the cloud version, it's scalable. It has served our needs. We plan to increase usage by 5 to 10 percent as our departments grow. 

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio since .NET first came out. Prior to that, I used tools with other software development languages like Eclipse. Eclipse was an IDE-independent software vendor. 

Installing Visual Studio is easy on average. Sometimes you need to install various libraries, so it depends on your setup. I would say it's medium difficulty.

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio nine out of 10. 

On-premises

We like Visual Studio because you can choose the different types of languages, like JavaScript. I think it's better than the other solutions I used.

The interface could be more user friendly. 

I've been working with Visual Studio for about two years.

Yeah. Stable.

I think it's good.

Microsoft support is quite responsive to our questions.

I used Sublime before. 

Straightforward

On-premises

I work as a developer. I code in it using Microsoft Visual Studio.

Basically everything. It's a useful integrated development environment.

It is easy to use.

It is simple to use for me.

It is simple to use for most developers and nearly impossible to use for non-developers.

For the last 10 to 20 years, I've been using various versions of Microsoft Visual Studio.

I am working with the latest version.

Microsoft Visual Studio is a stable solution.

Scalability does not apply to the solution.

I am the only user in my company.

It's good. Again, I'm using the community edition, which is the free version. It's an open-source, free version. It lacks support because I am not paying anything. I'm getting help from various public forums and community websites.

I am familiar with Google Chrome, Gmail, and Visual Studio. I now own a small company that does some development. I am a one-man operation.

I am working with the open-source community version, which is free.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Microsoft Visual Studio a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to develop web applications. I'm a programmer specialist II and we're customers of Visual Studio. 

I think the code management is the most convenient and valuable new feature. Deployment of the solution is also a very smooth process.

I think the file installations could be improved because they're very heavy and I'd like to see the solution support Python for developing purposes. 

I've been using this solution for three years. 

In the previous versions, the product wasn't so stable, but in this latest 2019 version they have fixed the issue and it's now a stable solution. 

The scalability is good in this solution. We have about five developers in the company using it on a regular basis. 

I'm very satisfied with the support. 

It is easy to install, the only issue being that it takes up a lot of memory. We had two people involved with the deployment and implementation took a few days. We didn't use any consultants, we just followed the documentation.

This is a simple product to use and the best advice I can give is to follow the documentation. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

On-premises