Saviynt Reviews

We use this solution for user authentication. It is integrated into our workflows and we use it for reporting.

The most valuable feature is the ease of implementation. This product works well out of the box and if you don’t want to do a lot of configuration then this is the best tool.

The reporting features are good.

The biggest drawback is that for every change you want to make, you have to go back to them and ask for it. There haven’t got a tool to make modifications. Ideally, we would like to be able to make changes from our side.

Saviynt is a very new tool, which makes it difficult to find good people with knowledge about implementing and using it. I think that in four to five years, there will be lots of people with experience in the area.

In the future, I would like to see extra certificates included.

I have been using Saviynt for about one year.

The stability of Saviynt is good.

Expanding this platform is a little bit difficult. I would say that the scalability is average.

We have approximately 4,000 users, of which perhaps 15 are technicians.

I would rate the technical support about nine out of ten.

Before using this solution, we used Oracle Identity and Access Management (IdM). We are still using IdM for some systems.

This solution is easy to implement, although our requirements were bulky so it took about four months to deploy.

We worked directly with the vendor, who assisted us with the implementation. The deployment team had four people and two people work on support and maintenance.

If you need to make any changes then there are additional fees. For example, if there is a user named Jonathan in the system and you want to change it then you have to pay for the change. It has to be done on their side.

Before choosing this solution, we also evaluated Omada and SailPoint. The main factors in our decision were pricing and that Saviynt is easy to implement.

My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is that if your user base is small and you do not require a great deal of customization, then this is the best tool.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

If the customer is looking at identity management as an access risk problem, not as an operational excellence solution, then we approach them with Saviynt. Our customers are enterprise-level so that means they have anywhere from five to ten thousand users.

The first valuable feature is the approach to solving the identity problem. Access risk is the focus of solving any problem. The second is their deeper integration with enterprise systems, like SAP, Microsoft, Adobe, and AWS. Deeper integration brings instability into the intact elements and ongoing systems. That angle of the deeper integration is not available with any of the products. That gives Saviynt an edge.

I think their interface is one clear area of needed improvement. Also, Saviynt cannot customize based on customer needs. The interface could also be more intuitive to the user.

We have been working with Saviynt for a few months now.

The stability of Saviynt is one of the concerns that we have heard from customers.

The scalability is a question mark because they have not been successful in the places where you have 200,000 to 300,000 identities. I have not seen any performance benchmarking for Saviynt.  

I would say that the setup was of medium complexity but it was not difficult. There are more complex products available, like Oracle, IBM, and others, so it's definitely better than those.

I would recommend Saviynt to clearly identify this solution. If you can do the proof of value first, then go for the implementation. Based on limited exposure, I would rate it at eight out of ten.

I use the solution in my company for identity governance in my projects.

The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease that it provides for the approvals and also for the end users, especially for the way they can submit self-service requests through the tool. The product also has some features like certifications, which are generally very helpful for projects where you kind of perform the access reviews for people.

Considering the shortcomings of the tool, I would say that the training part of the product needs improvement. The information that Saviynt provides in the training sessions can be a little more professional with respect to the slowness that we generally experience with Saviynt, that the total at times slow. Saviynt needs to work on the slowness of the product and try to streamline it so that there are no further hiccups in the solution from the slowness part that users face generally.

I don't find anything that needs to be addressed in the tool presently because I know that there might be more functionalities in the tool that I haven't explored yet. As of now, the tool looks good to me.

It would be better if Saviynt's support team takes less amount of time to fix any issues for the tickets submitted by the users.

I have been using Saviynt for a little over four years.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

As the tool is on the cloud, the tool will always offer scalability and availability.

I think the tool is good for medium and large companies.

I have not contacted the technical support of the product, but from what I heard from my peers, I can say that there are quite a few requests that are open with Saviynt's support team, and it is something that I have been hearing for every project.

The product's initial setup phase is simple.

I haven't come across the deployment, as it is something that happens at the initial phase of any project.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I can compare Saviynt with SailPoint. Saviynt is better than SailPoint as it is a more developer-friendly product. It does not require you to do too much coding. For people who are not completely into the core development side, where they have to code everything, I would say Saviynt is something that gives many out-of-the-box functionalities. The tool is very developer-friendly and easy to use. I heard that in SailPoint, more customizations are available for business analyst kind of roles. It is really difficult to manage the stakeholders when you have too many customizations available. From a developer-friendly point of view, I would rate Saviynt as having better grades than SailPoint.

I do not frequently work with risk analytics capabilities. I have rarely come across the functionality.

The tool is very easy to use since it is developer-friendly. Integrating applications using Saviynt is easy.

In our company, we generally integrate in-house tools and applications that are built for my projects. I haven't integrated any related applications with Saviynt yet. Integration of the tool is something that varies from project to project. It completely depends on the clients' requirements. In the couple of projects I have worked on till now, I haven't seen a requirement where we have integrated the tool with AI.

I can recommend the product to others.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.