SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

I use SentinelOne to protect against ransomware attacks, validate incoming emails, and ensure websites don't have any malicious coding.

SentinelOne's auto-rollback feature is the most valuable.

SentinelOne's phishing feature could be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for around five years.

SentinelOne is stable and reliable.

SentinelOne is easy to scale.

SentinelOne's technical support is helpful and competent.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward and completed within a day because we had run a POC with them to understand the environment and had all the information we needed. I would rate the setup process 3.5 out of five.

We did the implementation in-house with the support of SentinelOne engineers.

I would give SentinelOne a rating of eight out of ten.

We are using SentinelOne for an endpoint view of the corporate network.

The most valuable features of SentinelOne are the endpoint detection of threats, and it does not only rely on signatures for detection.

SentinelOne could improve by creating an autopilot or automated way to roll out the solution more efficiently which would be helpful.

I have been using SentinelOne for approximately one year.

SentinelOne is stable.

I rate the stability of SentinelOne a five out of five.

The scalability of SentinelOne is not a problem. These solutions can easily host up to 10,000 endpoints if not more, and we have 500. We do not have an immediate need to scale, but it is not an issue. As the company grows, the company will increase the usage of the solution.

I am satisfied with the support from SentinelOne.

SentinelOne is not too difficult to set up. The full deployment took a couple of months. The lengthy installation was caused by the fact that many people are remote working and we had 500 systems to install the solution on.

We did our own deployment of SentinelOne. We used three to five people for the deployment.

I rate SentinelOne an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for endpoint detection.

The solution works well in general.

It's a small size and offers an easy deployment. It's very quick to deploy.

The solution is stable.

It's quite scalable.

Every site has its own key. I'm not sure how I can implement the key for the setup package. Therefore, with every installation, I need to do it manually and put on the site keys.

It is an expensive product. They could work on lowering the price a bit.

I've used the solution for one year.

It is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The solution is quite scalable.

The initial setup and deployment are easy. I can get it up and running in five minutes.

The cost is a bit high. It's around $8 per client per month.

We are partners. We are using the latest version of the product.

I'd recommend the solution to others. We really like it in general.

I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten.

My client uses the solution for endpoint security and email security.

I have found the most valuable feature to be the rapid threat detection. 

We need to analyze the threats and make decisions based on that, so the analytics could be better at analyzing exactly where the threats are coming from.

One of my clients has been using the product for about three years.

My client has said that it is stable. 

It is a scalable solution.

We received a response from technical support within 48 hours. The support is great.

I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.

SentinelOne is for users wanting an enhanced level of endpoint security.

What I like about SentinelOne is that it sparks your curiosity. I also like its rollback feature.

The stability of SentinelOne should be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for three years.

We're using SentinelOne through one of our partners, and we have had some stability issues with it due to Windows 10 features updates. It should be more stable.

SentinelOne is a scalable solution.

Technical support for SentinelOne is fine.

The initial setup for SentinelOne is straightforward. Setting up the solution doesn't take long, e.g. on a per-device basis, it would take just 30 seconds.

We did the implementation of this solution ourselves.

Our customers pay for monthly for the license of SentinelOne.

We're an MSP, so we deploy SentinelOne for customers, e.g. 70 to 80 endpoints.

We've had some stability issues with the solution, and that's definitely a concern. I'm still pushing forward with SentinelOne, because it's the only kind of option we have in this space.

In terms of recommending SentinelOne, I'd give it a six out of ten.

The product is used to provide cybersecurity protection to SMBs predominantly in the financial, manufacturing, and retail industry as well as private individuals.

SentinelOne is key in achieving compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act in South Africa.

Resolving ransomware encrypted servers or personal computers is costly to the customer, both in repair costs and loss of business due to downtime. In addition, the customer may suffer reputational damage if any of its customer data is compromised. 

Our clients trust us to protect their IT systems and data. 

We use SentinelOne because it has proven itself and has never been breached. It offers us a 100% protection record and our company reputation stays intact.

Resolving ransomware encrypted servers or personal computers is both costly and time consuming to both the customer as well as the service provider - protecting against these attacks is a win-win for all.

The SentinelOne portal dashboard provides a good overview of all the sentinels deployed and offers quick access to review and resolve affected sites and endpoints

The most valuable feature is that it works and is reliable. 

Other solutions I have researched have all been breached, and as far as I can see, SentinelOne is the only one that has never been breached. It provides fully autonomous threat mitigation and ransomware file encryption roll back in real-time without human intervention.  

Our clients have been able to survive a ransomware attack without even knowing that they had had files encrypted and automatically rolled back - even their Point of Sale (POS) system did not miss a beat and the business continued as normal without interruption.

SentinelOne's ongoing updates and rate of technology improvments are adequate for now, and have kept SentinelOne ahead of the cyber criminals, but we cannot rest, and continuous development - in particular with regard to the areas of automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence - is required to stay ahead of the cyber criminal techniques and exploits.  The "false positive" detection rate could be improved, if possible, but this should not increase the risk of the endpoint being breached.

I've used the solution for over 2 years.

The stability is excellent.

The scalability is excellent.

The customer support has been okay.

I did not use a different solution previously.

The initial setup is straightforward. 

We are able to handle implementations in-house.

If you are an end-user you should procure the service through a Managed Cyber Security Systems Provider.

Yes, I have looked into ESET, Crowdstrike, Cylance, Webroot, and many others.

Contact me on cybersec[at]global[dot]co[dot]za

My primary use case for this solution to protect my clients and sites that I support from malware and ransom ware. It is installed on the end point clients and servers as a client and then it clean and protects after a reboot. As a managed service provider we found it instrumental at preventing viruses and especially preventing ransom ware. We went from 30% ransom ware infections to zero. The software stops the infection before it executes.

It has saved hundreds of hours fixing destroy and encrypted computers. In the old days even if you restored the files Windows was still damaged. This stops the software from executing.

The valuable feature of this solution is the ability for it to stop a virus or ransom ware. It uses a SOC for active monitoring and AI software that watches where you go and what gets executed. If it sees danger I get alerted and the machine is frozen. If the SOC believes it to be a virus the machines network card is frozen or the machine is automatically returned to the state before the file was executed and the file is erased. If it's safe the machine is auto unfrozen. I can go in look at the logs, verify if it's a false positive and unfreeze the machine. If I believe it is a virus I can return the machine to before the file got executed. Erasing any damage. If I believe it's a false positive I can mark it benign and re execute the file. So far it's stopped four ransomware cases from getting through, so it's doing a good job.

I think communication and documentation could be improved in the solution. When you get a virus alert, there's not a lot of upfront training to let you know how to resolve a situation when it occurs. The first couple of times you're flailing a little bit until you get it sorted. I would probably also suggest that the interface could use a little bit of help. It's a little hunt and peck. 

For additional features, I'd like to see the ability to control it on a cell phone. It would be great if I could have it in the palm of my hand so that if I get a false positive, I can just look at the dashboard on my phone.

I've been using this solution for seven months. 

The solution seems super stable, although you do get some false positives, especially when it encounters a new piece of software. But the SOC is able to quickly whitelist and adopt to the new software fairly quickly.

The solution is scalable. I'm able to put it both in a script and I can see it being able to be deployed in a large environment as well as a small one. I have 285 end points and the roles are anywhere from financial traders to insurance agents. All employees have access to the solution, it's actually turned into my main route for antivirus end protection and the product doesn't require any maintenance except for when it finds a virus.

I've used technical support a few times and it's very good. They're very responsive and they alert you very quickly when there's an issue. They lean heavier on protection, which can sometimes be a problem. A lot of times, by the time I'm logged in to look at it, they've already figured out that it's a false positive and they mark it and whitelist it and put the machine back online. All that can take less than a couple of seconds.

I've previously used several antivirus programs and then I got to the point where I wanted to use an artificial intelligence program. Originally I used CrowdStrike, which I also liked, but the main reason I switched to SentinelOne is because it's incorporated as part of my MSP solution suite.

The initial setup is very straightforward. When you implement, it goes through and does the initial scan and it makes the configuration changes that it needs. I haven't had a problem with any deployment at all and it's a very quick process. 

It's deployed in house

The cost of the solution varies and depends on your relationship with the supplier. My cost is USD $6 per end point. I don't have additional costs on top of that.

I evaluated, Norton 360, Windows antivirus, Webroot, Crowdstrike, and ESET

With solutions like these it's important to keep in mind that any automated system can give false positives, especially when they first encounter your software. Be patient, work with the SOC and the technical support team. If your work is implementation, then do whole sites at one time. It's best to do it in sections, let it sit for a couple of weeks and then do the rest.

I would rate this solution a ten out of 10. 

We have SentinelOne installed on all of our workstations and servers. It is set up with the maximum protection except that Active is in Alert Mode, and everything else is blocked.

The most valuable feature is that it just unintrusively works in the background to carry out the protection. You don't have to babysit it. Instead, it will alert if it sees something, you deal with it and carry on from there.

Periodically we have an application that does not work correctly when SentinelOne is installed, yet performs as expected when SentinelOne is removed. SentinelOne gives no clue as to the problem, so to diagnose what is happening can be difficult. To make it worse, the behavior is inconsistent. Two people in the office might have the application working correctly, but a third person using the same program will have a problem.

Nothing is displayed by the agent that is running on the workstations, but it would be helpful to have a mode available where we can see feedback as to what it is doing. We wouldn't want it running all the time because there would be more overhead, but it could be helpful for debugging or diagnosing problems.

I have been using SentinelOne for between six months and a year.

In terms of stability, it has been good so far.

It appears to be scalable.

The initial setup is very easy.

Our licensing fees are about $5 USD per endpoint, per month.

Overall, this is a good product and I recommend it. That said, there are always ways to make things better.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.