Spring Boot Reviews

We use Spring Boot to create different microservices. The configuration is very easy. We also make use of the in-built server. Spring Boot Two has reactive programming and that is valuable for microservices development. We have more than 1,000 users supported by Spring Boot. 

We use this solution on-premise as well as on the public cloud.

The community surrounding Spring Boot is really good. If you face any issue with Spring Boot, you will get the answer from the community. Spring Boot also provides smooth integration with other solutions. A module is provided for each integration including for Kafka and DB.

Building a new product in Spring Boot can take a long time since the solution uses reflection. This is one area the solution could be improved. 

I have been using this solution for more than five years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

I have not needed to contact support because I rely on the documentation provided. 

We switched to using Spring Boot to make our application more scalable and to be able to make custom configurations. If you have deployed something and you want to customize it, you can easily adjust it with the Spring Boot application without doing any code changes.

The initial setup is very straightforward using the Spring Initializr. You can configure any project in a matter of seconds. It creates an executable JAR and with a single command, it will run automatically.

This is an open source solution. 

I would advise others that it is important to know Java well. I would also recommend getting to know how Spring Boot works internally to use you make use of the proper configuration. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten as 99% of our requirements are met. 

It's a framework that is very easy to access and easy to configure. It's inbuilt to the Apache Tomcat server, and it's very lightweight. 

We like that it is an open-source tool. 

The solution is very lightweight.

It's simple to access.

The design is great. I can easily access and just pull API if I want to trigger any URL in that application.

One of the best aspects is that it is cloud native. 

Even if I want to implement a microservice that's in it, I can design the microservices. 

In terms of transactions, I can do a bunch of different services and break them down into microservices. I can do that using the RESTful API if I need to send it from the front end to the back end. 

It works well with GitHub. It's a very flexible way to configure the JavaBeans, XML configurations, and databases. We can manage REST endpoints, and I can use RESTful API, which makes it easy to auto-configure. There is no manual configuration needed. 

In terms of the Spring Boot application, the application's startup time needs to be improved. We'd like to see more speed and better performance. 

We'd like them to develop more supporting testing. We'd like to see it be more flexible.

It would be ideal if they continued to prioritize security.

They should ensure that auto-configuration related to Spring MVC will be added into any new features.

It's stable and very easy to create a standalone application. The performance is good and it is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

I've never had to contact support. I use a full-stack website. I can find many answers I'm looking for online. 

In terms of the initial setup, the basics are very important. If I know Java, for example, if I know Java, it will be easier. I have Java experience, and that's huge. I have more than seven years of experience, and I have worked in different frameworks. Therefore, for me, it's easy to understand the design of the architecture, which makes implementation simple. 

A cloud deployment won't take that much time. Every two weeks, I have the deployment using an Agile sprint. I can deploy within five minutes. It does, however, depend on the requirement. We tend to follow the documentation while moving into production. 

The solution is open-source and free to use. I'm not aware of the pricing of the commercial version. 

We are a customer and end-user.

If you plan to use this product for the first time, I suggest doing some research. It's easy to use and doesn't require that much configuration, however, it's simpler if you understand a little bit about it. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use Spring Boot for microservices, but for the logistic version. We also use the solution for traditional banking purposes.

The most valuable features of Spring Boot include being able to check all the logs and doing health checks for applications. We can also do monitoring more quickly, and use Spring Boot for production support, so when production goes up or down, we can bring up the application very quickly through Spring Boot.

Spring Boot is okay right now, but my team is looking for some integration where you can make a call to the JMS messaging service and other types of third-party integrations. If the integration with Spring Boot is improved, that would make the tool better.

What I'd like to see in the next release of Spring Boot is its integration or tie-up with messaging servers and third-party EFPs, as that would make it very good and more competitive versus other new solutions in the market.

I've been using Spring Boot for three and a half years now.

Overall, Spring Boot is a stable tool.

Spring Boot is a scalable tool. For example, in some microservices, you can just scale down if not used in most cases. For other micro solutions, you can bring up in the RAM space or in cluster mode. If you need more people to use Spring Boot, you can scale it, with no issues.

My rating for the Spring Boot technical support team is five out of five.

The initial setup for Spring Boot was straightforward, and it was completed within ten minutes.

We deployed Spring Boot in-house.

As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free.

As microservice is a new concept, Spring Boot is the first solution we've used that offers it. Before, we used a monolithic application, the Spring MVC. Now people are moving to microservices, with each service being broken down into a simple service.

My company deployed Spring Boot by embedding it on a Tomcat server.

In the company, twenty people use Spring Boot for different microservices such as logistic applications for invoice creations, booking logistic services, invoicing, login authentication, load management services for creating loads, creating roads on maps such as Google Maps, etc.

My company relies on Spring Boot and uses it extensively as it's an open-source tool and so much has been added to it in terms of Java. It's a platform with independent capabilities that you can just deploy in Windows or Linux, and that's a Spring Boot advantage.

My advice to anyone looking into implementing Spring Boot is to go for it. If you need microservices, this is the best solution to use.

My rating for Spring Boot is nine out of ten.

We use Spring Boot to build our own microservices as per our platform requirements. We build everything from scratch. It is easy for developers to learn how to use and to start building. We have approximately 100 people in our team using it. 

Spring Boot facilitates the use of Java which is open source. We use Github and other libraries that are available which assist in the building we need to do.

This solution could be improved if there were more libraries available. We would also like more mobile platform functionality using low levels of code. 

We have been using Spring Boot for two years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

Because Spring Boot operates using Java and is open source, there are a lot of artifacts available on the web. We have not needed to contact Spring Boot for customer support. 

We decided to use Spring Boot because it operates using Java which works on any platform including Windows, Linux, or Unix. It is easy to deploy in different environments.

The initial setup is generally straightforward but can be more complex when trying to build enterprise apps. The setup takes approximately one week. 

I would recommend this solution to those who have good Java knowledge and skills. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. The reason is that generally less code needs to be written when using it. The Spring Boot framework eliminates the need to write code from scratch. If you wanted to build your own product or solution, Spring Boot offers many possibilities. 

We use this solution for web applications and to handle data relevant to our customers. 

This solution is really user friendly. In terms of prototyping, it's really fast to build the applications we want to test to complete a proof of concept. In this regard, Spring Boot is really a good framework compared to Java EE because it has less boilerplate codes, and we program conventions over configurations.

This is a really good solution for me and I can't think of anything that can be improved.

I have been using this solution for five years. 

This is a stable solution. We have not experienced any issues or bugs that we were not able to fix. 

This is a scalable solution. We have an application that consumes around 500,000 messages per second and it's handling it quite well. This does depend on the capabilities of your hardware. 

I have previously used Java EE. When using Java EE, you have to have a separate application server. For Spring Boot, it has an embedded server so from the get go, you can easily run your application. With Java EE, you have to set up the application server first to be able to run it.

There is also a difference in the amount of boilerplate code that you need to write when using each of the systems. Spring Boot favors convention over configuration so there are no big challenges when it comes to setting it up. When using Java EE, you have to make sure that your dependencies work together.

The initial setup is very easy. You just need to specify some of the basic dependencies and you're good to go. You can have a running application by writing one class. Setting this up took us less than five minutes. We currently have just over 20 people using this solution. 

This solution is free unless you apply for support.

I would advise others to read the Spring Boot documentation because it is by far the best that I've seen when it comes to Java frameworks. You don't need to pay for courses, tutorials or training. Spring Boot also has a large community. Anything that you might want to ask about Spring Boot or any issue that you might encounter, has answers provided for by the community. 

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten. 

The solution is stable and has a vast community. It works on Java-based language and has an efficient framework.

They should include tutorial videos for understanding new technologies.

I have been using the solution for three years.

The solution's framework is stable. I rate its stability a ten. 

I rate the solution's scalability a ten.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward. I rate the process an eight. It requires specialized knowledge of Java. It takes one week for simple APIs. Whereas it might take a month or two for complex projects.

I rate the solution a nine. I advise others to know new ways of configuring it.

I used Spring Boot to create a prototype for a banking solution. I developed two microservices, one for ATMs and the other for the backend. I used Spring Boot with the microservices architecture. I also wrote an application to calculate discount strategies or sales systems for a backend website.

Spring Boot's main feature is that it's great for DevOps because you can write your own application. You don't need to install Apache Tomcat. You can create your project easily with a few clicks.

To monitor your application, you can use RESTful API in Spring Boot, which can help you write microservices applications. In the latest version of Spring Boot, there are many features for reactive programming as well.

If you want to create large microservices applications, you need to connect several applications and services to each other. It is very complicated, and Spring Boot does not have an integrated solution for it.

It would be good to have documentation on Spring Reactive to better understand it.

I've been using Spring Boot for the past two years.

Stability wise, I would rate Spring Boot at eight on a scale from one to ten.

Except for Spring Reactive, the other tools and technology stacks in Spring Boot don't offer scalability. 

Many years ago, I switched from JSF to Spring Boot because it is a good, general framework with many features. For example, Spring Boot has IoC, inversion of control, aspect-oriented programming, and Spring Reactive.

The development phase is simple to install.

Spring Boot is an open-source solution.

For writing applications, Spring Boot is a practical option, and I would give it a ten out of ten.

We use the solution to run microservices on an Azure platform. Our UI is on Angular, and Spring Boot is our backend. We have connections with Kafka Topics and some IBM backend tools, and Spring Boot is sufficient to play the part of the orchestration layer.

The solution is easy to use; I primarily employ integrated templates such as the REST template.

I like the containers as I can quickly boot up and run them in Apache Tomcat.

The product is also easy to deploy in a cloud-based infrastructure.

The tool's documentation could be improved, especially by tying it back to frequently asked questions and issues users have. A feedback loop in which the documentation targets the most commonly asked user questions would make using the solution easier. Essentially, I want a more user-centered approach to documentation rather than a purely technical focus.

The UI could be better, though, like many users, we don't use Spring Boot's UI functionality; we use an Angular front-end, and Spring is a backend layer. There are alternatives to using the solution's UI.

We've been using Spring Boot for around six years. 

Spring Boot is a very stable solution; I never had an issue with it. 

The product is scalable, providing the proper infrastructure is in place. If we have the resources, we could have 100 instances of the solution running, and that would be fine if the load were balanced. We use Spring Boot bank-wide, with about 300 developers in total.

The support is excellent. As Spring Boot is open source, help is always readily available, and we rarely need to go outside our organization to find it. The solution is not an off-the-shelf tool; it gives us a set of libraries where we can build, customize, and write our own tools. As we write our own software, the need for outside technical support is much less; we can support ourselves.

We integrate with third-party products in our ecosystem, including some IBM tools and Jakarta EE. The latter requires us to buy a license for a container, but Spring Boot comes with its own internal container called Docker.

The initial setup is straightforward and consists of going through a simple initializer process online by filling out a form with the project name and some requirements. Then, the form results will generate a shell project to download. This process takes under 15 minutes, especially if I know what features I want to include in my project. I rate the solution five out of five for ease of setup.

The solution is free. 

I rate the solution nine out of ten.

The tool is continually being improved, and when Java is upgraded, the Spring Boot update quickly follows. They're doing very well on that front.