Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jakarta EE
Ranking in Java Frameworks
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spring Boot
Ranking in Java Frameworks
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Jakarta EE is 17.6%, down from 22.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 34.4%, down from 41.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Spring Boot34.4%
Jakarta EE17.6%
Other48.0%
Java Frameworks
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Content Manager at PeerSpot
Nov 29, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

Mortaza Ghahramani - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Java Software Engineer at eDreams ODIGEO
Cloud-friendly but has problems with configuration
I primarily use Jakarta EE as a business enterprise product Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly. Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience.…
reviewer2759913 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Software Developer at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Has improved application monitoring and supports modular development with built-in configuration features
Spring Boot has many valuable features. First, it requires less coding and less configuration. The configurations are already in-built. The security features in Spring Boot are in-built, so we don't need to use any external third-party applications for security. In Spring Boot, the robust configuration capabilities help in adapting to diverse deployment scenarios because there is a minimum configuration required for developing any applications. The auto-configuration feature is available in Spring Boot. When we start any application, there is a property file where we mention the keys, securities, DB connections, and all other configurations. When we start any application, it loads the application properties first, which include the credentials and security files. I am using Spring Boot starter projects. I assess Spring Boot's auto-configuration feature as highly efficient in managing application setup. The application.properties file allows us to specify the server settings, such as the port we want to start the server on. For example, the default is 8080, but we can configure it to 8081. Additionally, we can store connection details such as the driver class, data source URL, username, and password in the application.properties file.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."
"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."
"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."
"I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products."
"This is a pretty light solution. It's not too heavy."
"The solution's framework is stable."
"Spring Boot facilitates the use of Java which is open source. We use Github and other libraries that are available which assist in the building we need to do."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The solution reduces our development time."
"We like that it is an open-source tool."
"The API gateway and cloud configuration allows us to configure the properties outside of the service with respect to enrollment."
 

Cons

"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."
"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."
"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."
"It needs more applicable control for large-scale application development."
"This solution could be improved if it offered greater integration and was more compatible with other solutions."
"The solution has some vulnerabilities and fails our security audits, forcing us to keep fixing the solution."
"It needs to be simplified, more user-friendly."
"The product could be improved by supporting and integrating Hadoop."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"communicationbetween different services from the third party layers or with the legacy applications needs to improve."
"Having to restart the application to reload properties."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."
"Spring Boot is open source."
"It's an open-source solution."
"I am using a free version of Spring Boot."
"I use the free version of Spring Boot."
"As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."
"This is an open-source product."
"It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
"Spring Boot is an open-source solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offe...
What do you like most about Spring Boot?
1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spring Boot?
Since Spring Boot is an open-source tool, I do not have to pay anything for Spring Boot.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.