Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

Eclipse Foundation and Broadcom are both solutions in the Java Frameworks category. Eclipse Foundation is ranked #3, while Broadcom is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Eclipse Foundation holds a 16.9% mindshare in JF, compared to Broadcom’s 28.0% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Eclipse Foundation users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Jakarta EE

Read 3 Jakarta EE reviews

1,974 Views
1,954 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Spring Boot

Read 44 Spring Boot reviews

6,090 Views
4,446 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Jakarta EE

Spring Boot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Spring Boot and Jakarta EE are competing products in the Java enterprise space. Spring Boot has the upper hand due to its ease of use and support, making it popular among developers seeking quick setups.

Features: Spring Boot is known for microservices capabilities, a convention over configuration approach, and extensive ecosystem integration. Jakarta EE is known for comprehensive support for enterprise-grade applications, mature infrastructure, and adherence to standards. The difference lies in Spring Boot’s lightweight framework versus Jakarta EE’s enterprise-focused setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spring Boot is easier to deploy due to its simplified configuration, enhancing productivity and offering superior support. Jakarta EE deployments are more complex, requiring a server, with extensive documentation but less agile customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Spring Boot generally has lower upfront costs due to minimal configuration requirements, contributing to quicker ROI. Jakarta EE may involve higher setup costs because of its complexity and reliance on commercial support but provides substantial long-term value for large-scale applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jakarta EE

Ranking in Java Frameworks

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spring Boot

Ranking in Java Frameworks

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Jakarta EE is 16.9%, up from 16.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 28.0%, down from 40.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Java Frameworks Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Spring Boot	28.0%
Jakarta EE	16.9%
Other	55.1%

Java Frameworks

Q&A Highlights

Netanya Carmi

Content Manager at PeerSpot

Nov 29, 2021

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers users a solution that makes it easy to scale up the application to whatever degree the situation demands. The product can be used on the cloud, which allows users to truly scale their application according to their needs. With this cloud feature you can scale your application horizontally and at the same time ensure that your resources are used in the most effective way possible. Throughout the scaling process, resources are shared across the application. Instead of simply throwing ever more resources at the application as it grows, the resources that are already there will be distributed in a way that ensures that they go where they are needed. This makes it a very valuable solution for resource-conscious companies. Another aspect of the solution that makes it so valuable is its ability to create and customize applications. The design of the program is such that applications can be created to your specifications rather quickly. They can then be customized within a short time. When these abilities are combined, what results is a versatile product that saves an organization much in terms of time and resources. Ease of use means that now a company can create whatever it needs to with the minimum level of expenditure possible. Jakarta EE allows users to have different kinds of interfaces depending on the type of application that is being created. This shows an acute sensitivity to the needs of their users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution so far as they are concerned. As far as its ability to customize is concerned, though, Jakarta EE falls short of the mark set by Spring Boot. The customizations that can be added to the system slow it down and make it less effective. This is a disadvantage that makes it less likely to be employed by companies who view time as something to be carefully guarded. Conclusion: While Jakarta EE offers a competent product, Spring Boot is by far the better product.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve

When running applications in the cloud, scalability is highly dependent on how you configure it. Factors such as the number of instances you want to scale, and the threshold for scaling based on the quantity of messages or the amount of data, are all customizable based on your application's needs.

Read full review

reviewer2759913

Sr Software Developer at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees

Has improved application monitoring and supports modular development with built-in configuration features

Spring Boot has many valuable features. First, it requires less coding and less configuration. The configurations are already in-built. The security features in Spring Boot are in-built, so we don't need to use any external third-party applications for security. In Spring Boot, the robust configuration capabilities help in adapting to diverse deployment scenarios because there is a minimum configuration required for developing any applications. The auto-configuration feature is available in Spring Boot. When we start any application, there is a property file where we mention the keys, securities, DB connections, and all other configurations. When we start any application, it loads the application properties first, which include the credentials and security files. I am using Spring Boot starter projects. I assess Spring Boot's auto-configuration feature as highly efficient in managing application setup. The application.properties file allows us to specify the server settings, such as the port we want to start the server on. For example, the default is 8080, but we can configure it to 8081. Additionally, we can store connection details such as the driver class, data source URL, username, and password in the application.properties file.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Eclipse is now on a good track and they have a very good interface."

"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."

"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."

"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

"The community surrounding Spring Boot is really good. If you face any issue with Spring Boot, you will get the answer from the community."

"The initial setup is very straightforward using the Spring Initializr, and you can configure any project in a matter of seconds, creating an executable JAR that will run automatically with a single command."

"The platform is easy for developers to download."

"From working with Spring Boot, I have seen many benefits."

"This is a pretty light solution. It's not too heavy."

"It is a stable solution."

"Anything which is to do with enterprise scale, as far as Java is concerned, Spring Boot has all the best practices factored in."

"It's very easy to get started. It's very quick. Most of the configurations are already available. So not much time is spent on setting up things. One can quickly set up and then get rolling."

More Spring Boot pros

Cons

"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."

"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."

"All the customization and all the plugins we can install make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."

"Spring Boot is lacking visibility in terms of how that business process or business rule would look within your application. Because everything has been embedded within the code itself, it disables the visibility. the ability to maintain or even support a specific functionality in a user-friendly manner, where a developer can come up and just adjust that part of that process."

"This solution could be improved if there were more libraries available. We would also like more mobile platform functionality using low levels of code."

"Spring Boot is lacking visibility in terms of how that business process or business rule would look within your application."

"Spring Boot can improve the dependency tree that we use for libraries. It would be helpful if it was less complex."

"There are tons of improvements that we can do in Spring Boot."

"Spring Boot is okay right now, but my team is looking for some integration where you can make a call to the JMS messaging service and other types of third-party integrations. If the integration with Spring Boot is improved, that would make the tool better. What I'd like to see in the next release of Spring Boot is its integration or tie-up with messaging servers and third-party EFPs, as that would make it very good and more competitive versus other new solutions in the market."

"It needs more applicable control for large-scale application development."

"This solution could be improved if it offered greater integration and was more compatible with other solutions."

More Spring Boot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."

"Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."

"This is an open source solution."

"Spring Boot is open source."

"Spring Boot is an open-source solution."

"As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."

"This solution is free unless you apply for support."

"It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."

"This is an open-source product."

More Spring Boot pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

See all answers

What do you like most about Spring Boot?

1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...

See all answers

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?

Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spring Boot?

Although I was not directly involved in the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspects, the framework is very cost-effective while still providing enterprise-grade capabilities.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Spark vs Jakarta EE

Compared 11% of the time

Spring MVC vs Jakarta EE

Compared 8% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Jakarta EE

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Corretto vs Jakarta EE

Compared 6% of the time

Vert.x vs Jakarta EE

Compared 5% of the time

More Jakarta EE Competitors

IBM Open Liberty vs Spring Boot

Compared 29% of the time

Apache Spark vs Spring Boot

Compared 10% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Spring Boot

Compared 9% of the time

Vert.x vs Spring Boot

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Application Development Framework vs Spring Boot

Compared 5% of the time

More Spring Boot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

May 2026

Download Jakarta EE product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring Boot

May 2026

Download Spring Boot product report

Overview

Jakarta EE is a widely recognized framework for building enterprise applications. It facilitates the development of scalable applications by offering a comprehensive set of specifications, fostering a more efficient and reliable environment for developers.

As a robust enterprise platform, Jakarta EE supports the development of dynamic applications through a suite of specifications that ensure consistency, security, and scalability. It enables developers to utilize a broad range of tools, promoting streamlined application transformation while maintaining high-performance standards. Jakarta EE's architecture supports cloud-native development, making it suitable for both traditional and modern applications.

What features stand out in Jakarta EE?

Standardized Environment: Facilitates compatibility and reduces complexity.
Modular Design: Enhances flexibility and scalability of applications.
Developer Tools: Offers a wide array of tools for efficient coding.
Security Protocols: Provides robust security mechanisms.
Cloud-Native Support: Optimizes applications for cloud deployments.

Which benefits should be highlighted in reviews?

Scalability: Seamless expansion of application capabilities.
Efficiency: Streamlined processes boost productivity.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces resource usage and overheads.
Reliability: Ensures consistent application performance.
Innovation Support: Adapts to modern technological advancements.

In specialized industries like finance and healthcare, Jakarta EE is implemented to meet demanding regulatory requirements and data integrity standards. In finance, it supports secure transactions and compliance. In healthcare, it aids in handling sensitive patient data efficiently, ensuring both security and accessibility.

Eclipse Foundation

Spring Boot is admired for its simplicity, stable and lightweight framework, and robust support for microservices and cloud-native environments. Its open-source nature, seamless database integration, and efficient use of annotations enhance its appeal among developers.

Spring Boot simplifies application development with minimal coding, auto-configuration, and an extensive library. It excels in creating microservices architectures and offers robust security and monitoring features. Well-supported by a vibrant community, Spring Boot integrates smoothly with databases and provides valuable starter projects. However, challenges remain with cloud packaging, AI integration, and improving Kubernetes communication. Enhancing reactive session support, security layers, documentation, and handling of large data volumes could further boost efficiency.

What are the key features of Spring Boot?

Simplicity: Minimal setup and deployment streamline development.
Auto-configuration: Reduces coding efforts significantly.
Microservices Support: Enhances capabilities in cloud-native environments.
Security Features: Offers robust security mechanisms.
Database Integration: Seamless and efficient database support.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Faster deployment and development with fewer configurations.
Community Support: Access to extensive libraries and starter projects.
Versatility: Applicable to many sectors like banking and healthcare.
Security: Comprehensive security features enhance protection.
Integration: Excellent for cloud deployments and API development.

Spring Boot is widely employed in banking, logistics, and healthcare, primarily for web applications and microservices. It supports both frontend and backend services, making it essential in environments that require robust API development, cloud deployments, and advanced monitoring capabilities.

Broadcom

Buyer's Guide

Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

June 2026

Free Report: Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot report.

See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.