Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Eclipse Foundation and Broadcom are both solutions in the Java Frameworks category. Eclipse Foundation is ranked #3, while Broadcom is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Eclipse Foundation holds a 14.3% mindshare in JF, compared to Broadcom’s 24.4% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Eclipse Foundation users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Jakarta EE

Read 3 Jakarta EE reviews

1,753 Views
1,718 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Spring Boot

Read 44 Spring Boot reviews

6,128 Views
4,535 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Jakarta EE

Spring Boot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Spring Boot and Jakarta EE are competing products in the Java enterprise space. Spring Boot has the upper hand due to its ease of use and support, making it popular among developers seeking quick setups.

Features: Spring Boot is known for microservices capabilities, a convention over configuration approach, and extensive ecosystem integration. Jakarta EE is known for comprehensive support for enterprise-grade applications, mature infrastructure, and adherence to standards. The difference lies in Spring Boot’s lightweight framework versus Jakarta EE’s enterprise-focused setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spring Boot is easier to deploy due to its simplified configuration, enhancing productivity and offering superior support. Jakarta EE deployments are more complex, requiring a server, with extensive documentation but less agile customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Spring Boot generally has lower upfront costs due to minimal configuration requirements, contributing to quicker ROI. Jakarta EE may involve higher setup costs because of its complexity and reliance on commercial support but provides substantial long-term value for large-scale applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jakarta EE

Ranking in Java Frameworks

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spring Boot

Ranking in Java Frameworks

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Jakarta EE is 14.3%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 24.4%, down from 38.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Java Frameworks Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Spring Boot	24.4%
Jakarta EE	14.3%
Other	61.3%

Java Frameworks

Q&A Highlights

Netanya Carmi

Content Manager at PeerSpot

Nov 29, 2021

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers users a solution that makes it easy to scale up the application to whatever degree the situation demands. The product can be used on the cloud, which allows users to truly scale their application according to their needs. With this cloud feature you can scale your application horizontally and at the same time ensure that your resources are used in the most effective way possible. Throughout the scaling process, resources are shared across the application. Instead of simply throwing ever more resources at the application as it grows, the resources that are already there will be distributed in a way that ensures that they go where they are needed. This makes it a very valuable solution for resource-conscious companies. Another aspect of the solution that makes it so valuable is its ability to create and customize applications. The design of the program is such that applications can be created to your specifications rather quickly. They can then be customized within a short time. When these abilities are combined, what results is a versatile product that saves an organization much in terms of time and resources. Ease of use means that now a company can create whatever it needs to with the minimum level of expenditure possible. Jakarta EE allows users to have different kinds of interfaces depending on the type of application that is being created. This shows an acute sensitivity to the needs of their users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution so far as they are concerned. As far as its ability to customize is concerned, though, Jakarta EE falls short of the mark set by Spring Boot. The customizations that can be added to the system slow it down and make it less effective. This is a disadvantage that makes it less likely to be employed by companies who view time as something to be carefully guarded. Conclusion: While Jakarta EE offers a competent product, Spring Boot is by far the better product.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve

When running applications in the cloud, scalability is highly dependent on how you configure it. Factors such as the number of instances you want to scale, and the threshold for scaling based on the quantity of messages or the amount of data, are all customizable based on your application's needs.

Read full review

Venkataraju Nandam

Solution Architect at SID GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC

Has enabled me to implement flexible microservices and streamline deployment workflows for cloud and on-premises environments

I have not evaluated such scenarios because what we currently have allows us to use it effectively. We always face one challenge with Spring Boot applications when libraries are updated, libraries have changed, or class loaders or class-level implementation are modified based on Java or other libraries. At these times, we definitely face challenges, but this is something developers must handle by identifying the right library. Because it is open source, all external systems are actually external to Spring framework. The challenge could be addressed through auto-identification or auto-configuration based on versioning since version-to-version libraries are different. Based on versioning, that would be really helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."

"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."

"Eclipse is now on a good track and they have a very good interface."

"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

"Features that help with monitoring and tracking network calls between several micro services."

"Spring Boot is very valuable because it can accommodate any number of implementations that can be done by microservices, and it has many advantages when used on top of Java."

"This solution is really user friendly. In terms of prototyping, it's really fast to build the applications we want to test to complete a proof of concept."

"The best feature in Spring Boot is that it's pretty easy to create any project from scratch and we get a lot of boilerplate code from Spring Boot."

"The platform is easy for developers to download."

"We like that the product is open-source."

"I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products."

"Once you know how to use this solution, it's very easy, especially when building APIs."

More Spring Boot pros

Cons

"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."

"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."

"All the customization and all the plugins we can install make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."

"The services we develop are purely synchronous services, so there's a blocking and waiting state. This is a big problem in microservices."

"We'd like to have fewer updates."

"In terms of the Spring Boot application, the application's startup time needs to be improved."

"This solution could be improved if there were more libraries available. We would also like more mobile platform functionality using low levels of code."

"The security could be simplified."

"This is not a tool for beginners; you need to know and understand it well, and it needs to be simplified and more user-friendly."

"The product could be improved by supporting and integrating Hadoop."

"We'd like them to develop more supporting testing."

More Spring Boot cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."

"It's an open-source solution."

"I use the free version of Spring Boot."

"This solution is free unless you apply for support."

"Spring Boot is open source. It's a free tool and free framework."

"Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."

"The solution is an open-source tool."

"Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."

"Spring Boot is open source."

More Spring Boot pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

See all answers

What do you like most about Spring Boot?

1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...

See all answers

Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?

Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spring Boot?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that it was reasonable, which is why we chose this solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Spark vs Jakarta EE

Compared 13% of the time

Spring MVC vs Jakarta EE

Compared 11% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Jakarta EE

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Corretto vs Jakarta EE

Compared 6% of the time

Vert.x vs Jakarta EE

Compared 5% of the time

More Jakarta EE Competitors

IBM Open Liberty vs Spring Boot

Compared 21% of the time

Apache Spark vs Spring Boot

Compared 10% of the time

Vert.x vs Spring Boot

Compared 10% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Spring Boot

Compared 9% of the time

Helidon vs Spring Boot

Compared 7% of the time

More Spring Boot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

October 2026

Download Jakarta EE product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring Boot

October 2026

Download Spring Boot product report

Overview

Jakarta EE is a widely recognized framework for building enterprise applications. It facilitates the development of scalable applications by offering a comprehensive set of specifications, fostering a more efficient and reliable environment for developers.

As a robust enterprise platform, Jakarta EE supports the development of dynamic applications through a suite of specifications that ensure consistency, security, and scalability. It enables developers to utilize a broad range of tools, promoting streamlined application transformation while maintaining high-performance standards. Jakarta EE's architecture supports cloud-native development, making it suitable for both traditional and modern applications.

What features stand out in Jakarta EE?

Standardized Environment: Facilitates compatibility and reduces complexity.
Modular Design: Enhances flexibility and scalability of applications.
Developer Tools: Offers a wide array of tools for efficient coding.
Security Protocols: Provides robust security mechanisms.
Cloud-Native Support: Optimizes applications for cloud deployments.

Which benefits should be highlighted in reviews?

Scalability: Seamless expansion of application capabilities.
Efficiency: Streamlined processes boost productivity.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces resource usage and overheads.
Reliability: Ensures consistent application performance.
Innovation Support: Adapts to modern technological advancements.

In specialized industries like finance and healthcare, Jakarta EE is implemented to meet demanding regulatory requirements and data integrity standards. In finance, it supports secure transactions and compliance. In healthcare, it aids in handling sensitive patient data efficiently, ensuring both security and accessibility.

Eclipse Foundation

Spring Boot is admired for its simplicity, stable and lightweight framework, and robust support for microservices and cloud-native environments. Its open-source nature, seamless database integration, and efficient use of annotations enhance its appeal among developers.

Spring Boot simplifies application development with minimal coding, auto-configuration, and an extensive library. It excels in creating microservices architectures and offers robust security and monitoring features. Well-supported by a vibrant community, Spring Boot integrates smoothly with databases and provides valuable starter projects. However, challenges remain with cloud packaging, AI integration, and improving Kubernetes communication. Enhancing reactive session support, security layers, documentation, and handling of large data volumes could further boost efficiency.

What are the key features of Spring Boot?

Simplicity: Minimal setup and deployment streamline development.
Auto-configuration: Reduces coding efforts significantly.
Microservices Support: Enhances capabilities in cloud-native environments.
Security Features: Offers robust security mechanisms.
Database Integration: Seamless and efficient database support.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Faster deployment and development with fewer configurations.
Community Support: Access to extensive libraries and starter projects.
Versatility: Applicable to many sectors like banking and healthcare.
Security: Comprehensive security features enhance protection.
Integration: Excellent for cloud deployments and API development.

Spring Boot is widely employed in banking, logistics, and healthcare, primarily for web applications and microservices. It supports both frontend and backend services, making it essential in environments that require robust API development, cloud deployments, and advanced monitoring capabilities.

Broadcom

Buyer's Guide

Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

October 2026

Free Report: Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot

Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot report.

See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.