Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jakarta EE
Ranking in Java Frameworks
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spring Boot
Ranking in Java Frameworks
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Jakarta EE is 16.8%, down from 23.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 35.5%, down from 41.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Spring Boot35.5%
Jakarta EE16.8%
Other47.7%
Java Frameworks
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Content Manager at PeerSpot
Nov 29, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

Mortaza Ghahramani - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Java Software Engineer at eDreams ODIGEO
Cloud-friendly but has problems with configuration
I primarily use Jakarta EE as a business enterprise product Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly. Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience.…
reviewer2759913 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Software Developer at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Has improved application monitoring and supports modular development with built-in configuration features
Spring Boot has many valuable features. First, it requires less coding and less configuration. The configurations are already in-built. The security features in Spring Boot are in-built, so we don't need to use any external third-party applications for security. In Spring Boot, the robust configuration capabilities help in adapting to diverse deployment scenarios because there is a minimum configuration required for developing any applications. The auto-configuration feature is available in Spring Boot. When we start any application, there is a property file where we mention the keys, securities, DB connections, and all other configurations. When we start any application, it loads the application properties first, which include the credentials and security files. I am using Spring Boot starter projects. I assess Spring Boot's auto-configuration feature as highly efficient in managing application setup. The application.properties file allows us to specify the server settings, such as the port we want to start the server on. For example, the default is 8080, but we can configure it to 8081. Additionally, we can store connection details such as the driver class, data source URL, username, and password in the application.properties file.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."
"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."
"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."
"The API gateway and cloud configuration allows us to configure the properties outside of the service with respect to enrollment."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is all the interactions to various applications happen using Spring Boot."
"The solution is easy to use; I primarily employ integrated templates such as the REST template."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is it reduces the configuration needed. The configuration is handled by the solution. For example, if you're going to develop a web service, we needed to have a Tomcat web server and had to deploy the services and do tests. However, with Spring Boot, the default server comes with Spring Boot which reduces the task of doing all the configuration."
"It is a stable solution."
"We like that it is an open-source tool."
"The configuration setup in Spring Boot is pretty simplified compared to Hibernate ORM."
"I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products."
 

Cons

"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."
"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."
"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."
"The cloud packaging is not very straightforward."
"We'd like to have fewer updates."
"I would like to see more integration in this solution."
"If you want to have multiple integrations, the setup phase will become complex."
"Perhaps an even lighter-weight, leaner version could be made available, to compete with alternative solutions, such as NodeJS."
"Nothing really comes to mind in terms of areas of improvement."
"We'd like them to develop more supporting testing."
"Spring Boot is okay right now, but my team is looking for some integration where you can make a call to the JMS messaging service and other types of third-party integrations. If the integration with Spring Boot is improved, that would make the tool better. What I'd like to see in the next release of Spring Boot is its integration or tie-up with messaging servers and third-party EFPs, as that would make it very good and more competitive versus other new solutions in the market."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."
"Spring Boot is open source."
"The solution is an open-source tool."
"Spring Boot is an open-source solution."
"Spring Boot is open source. It's a free tool and free framework."
"This is an open source solution."
"The solution is free."
"I use the free version of Spring Boot."
"It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offe...
What do you like most about Spring Boot?
1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spring Boot?
Since Spring Boot is an open-source tool, I do not have to pay anything for Spring Boot.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.