Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Open Liberty vs Spring Boot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
2.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Application Server (7th)
Spring Boot
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Java Frameworks (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Open Liberty and Spring Boot aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Open Liberty is designed for Application Server and holds a mindshare of 2.1%.
Spring Boot, on the other hand, focuses on Java Frameworks, holds 38.9% mindshare, down 42.2% since last year.
Application Server Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Open Liberty2.1%
Oracle WebLogic Server18.0%
Tomcat16.7%
Other63.2%
Application Server
Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Spring Boot38.9%
Jakarta EE15.1%
Helidon11.1%
Other34.900000000000006%
Java Frameworks
 

Q&A Highlights

PA
Aug 20, 2023
 

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA - PeerSpot reviewer
Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates
The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.
Kumar Aditya - PeerSpot reviewer
Has simplified service creation and accelerated development while needing better handling of null values and security configuration
There are tons of improvements that we can do in Spring Boot. I would start with having a default configuration. Whenever we are fetching data from the database, if the value is null, if the column contains a null value, then it creates a null pointer exception in the whole service. This could be one of the improvements where we can keep it configurable. If the database is returning null then we would have some default data. These can be on the part of the entity. On the security part, there is a lot of improvement that can be done and also on the documentation side. The way we configure the security is a bit complicated.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."
"The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important."
"This is a stable solution that is being used in the HR space."
"This is a pretty light solution. It's not too heavy."
"It's great because it simplifies development. Together with MyBatis they make a beautiful pair for Java development."
"The solution reduces our development time."
"It's very easy to get started. It's very quick. Most of the configurations are already available. So not much time is spent on setting up things. One can quickly set up and then get rolling."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The configuration setup in Spring Boot is pretty simplified compared to Hibernate ORM."
"Spring Boot's configuration is easy, and it has an out-of-the-box deployment."
 

Cons

"To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial."
"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."
"Nothing really comes to mind in terms of areas of improvement."
"It needs more applicable control for large-scale application development."
"Spring Boot is okay right now, but my team is looking for some integration where you can make a call to the JMS messaging service and other types of third-party integrations. If the integration with Spring Boot is improved, that would make the tool better. What I'd like to see in the next release of Spring Boot is its integration or tie-up with messaging servers and third-party EFPs, as that would make it very good and more competitive versus other new solutions in the market."
"Spring Boot's cost could be cheaper."
"The performance could be better."
"We have specific algorithms for our Load Balancer or API gateway. So those things, if they could make it more precise, that would be beneficial. Sometimes when we are under pressure or any new person who looks into that stuff, we'll get confused or scared because of some difficulties in understanding Which algorithm needs to be used to implement a Load Balancer. When when we Yeah. Because when we say circuit breaker, we need to use it, and then the user gets a blank circuit breaker. This means we are saying the circuit breaker needs to be moved, and then that circuit breaker needs to be elaborated more. What type of algorithm should I do, and what exactly do I need to get done so that this circuit breaker can help me to resolve my issue? Because, you know, because if you go for the circuit breaker, it will ask to open the new tab, you know, since it will check. If the service is not responding, it will wait and go for another connection. So in similar words, if they can explain it a bit more, that will be helpful. Everyone could do their own Google stuff, and they will get it, but they need help understanding how this could help them to resolve the issue. It will be good if Spring Boot provides information about real-time use cases."
"It needs to be simplified, more user-friendly."
"The product could be improved by supporting and integrating Hadoop."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."
"It's an open-source solution."
"This is an open-source product."
"Spring Boot is open source. It's a free tool and free framework."
"Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
"The solution is free."
"This is an open source solution."
"If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
"The solution is an open-source tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
51%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Open Liberty?
To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial. Having more integration with Kafka, Mongo, and middleware systems that ...
What is your primary use case for Open Liberty?
I used IBM Open Liberty for an application for financial services using IBM Open Liberty and MicroProfile to process data for financial services work.
What advice do you have for others considering Open Liberty?
I used IBM Open Liberty in the past in a project, but today I'm not using it anymore. I had a good experience working with it in a financial services company. This was very beneficial. My review ra...
What do you like most about Spring Boot?
1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offe...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: September 2025.
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.