IBM Open Liberty vs Spring MVC comparison

The compared IBM and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #8 in AppS , with an average rating of 10.0, and holds a 4.7% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #8 in JF , and holds a 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

IBM Open Liberty

Read 2 IBM Open Liberty reviews

1,953 Views
352 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spring MVC

Read 15 Spring MVC reviews

913 Views
849 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Open Liberty

Spring MVC

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Server Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (8th)

Spring MVC

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Java Frameworks (8th)

Mindshare comparison

IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Open Liberty is designed for Application Server and holds a mindshare of 4.7%.
Spring MVC, on the other hand, focuses on Java Frameworks, holds 5.6% mindshare, up 3.9% since last year.

Application Server Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Open Liberty	4.7%
Tomcat	12.9%
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)	12.8%
Other	69.6%

Application Server

Java Frameworks Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Spring MVC	5.6%
Spring Boot	33.2%
Jakarta EE	17.2%
Other	44.0%

Java Frameworks

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA

Partner at SouJava

Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates

The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.

Read full review

reviewer2151066

Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Straightforward setup, highly stable, and useful online support

We are using Spring MVC based on our business problem statements One of the most valuble features for our business is the bootstrap which allows our developers to save time when developing code. Additionally, it has a built-in library that is useful. The most valuable features of Spring MVC are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important."

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."

"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring."

"The solution is open-source and free to use."

"The most valuable feature of Spring MVC is the configuration, such as WAF."

"It provides the best documentation for technical support."

"When we shifted from our legacy frameworks to the Spring framework, we discovered that Spring definitely made our development easier. One good example is that there is a lot of boiler plate code available that you don't have to write from scratch, making the development of web applications a much simpler process."

"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."

"I am today able to spin up a Java web service, especially with embedded Tomcat, within hours."

"The most valuable features of Spring MVC are the modules, such as Spring Admin. All the Spring solutions work well together and are simple to maintain, such as the load balancing on the client side."

More Spring MVC pros

Cons

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."

"To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial."

"The initial setup could be more straightforward."

"Spring IDE needs some work and improvement. We have faced many issues when adding third-party Eclipse plugins."

"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."

"The documentation for Spring MVC could improve."

"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."

"I saw some error messages coming up when they were getting problems actually viewing all the reports."

"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."

"The link with UI components could be improved."

More Spring MVC cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."

"It is an open-source solution."

"Spring MVC is open source and free."

"We are using the open-source version of the solution."

"The solution is free."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

52%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Open Liberty?

To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial. Having more integration with Kafka, Mongo, and middleware systems that ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty for an application for financial services using IBM Open Liberty and MicroProfile to process data for financial services work.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty in the past in a project, but today I'm not using it anymore. I had a good experience working with it in a financial services company. This was very beneficial. My review ra...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 54% of the time

IBM WebSphere Liberty vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 10% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 5% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 1% of the time

More IBM Open Liberty Competitors

Jakarta EE vs Spring MVC

Compared 21% of the time

Apache Spark vs Spring MVC

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle Application Development Framework vs Spring MVC

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon Corretto vs Spring MVC

Compared 11% of the time

More Spring MVC Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

March 2026

Download IBM Open Liberty product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring MVC

February 2026

Download Spring MVC product report

Also Known As

No data available

Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework

Overview

IBM Open Liberty is a highly adaptable and lightweight Java runtime, designed to cater to modern cloud-native applications. Its flexibility and commitment to open source makes it a valuable asset for developers seeking ease of deployment and scalability.

IBM Open Liberty stands out for its ease of integration into cloud environments and its emphasis on developer productivity. It permits quick iterations with minimal overhead, thanks in part to its support for MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. This allows for streamlined deployment processes, making contemporary software development more efficient.

What are the valuable features of IBM Open Liberty?

Lightweight Server: Minimizes resource consumption, enabling faster performance.
Dev Mode: Provides a real-time feedback loop, simplifying development cycles.
MicroProfile Support: Assists in building microservices architecture effectively.
Jakarta EE Support: Ensures compatibility with enterprise standards.

What are the benefits or ROI to consider?

Scalability: Adapts easily to increasing workloads while maintaining performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by optimizing server usage.
Developer Productivity: Accelerates development through intuitive tooling.
Cloud Readiness: Facilitates seamless integration with cloud platforms.

IBM Open Liberty finds applications across multiple industries. In finance, it supports robust transactional systems. In telecommunications, it enhances service delivery with reliable microservices infrastructure. Health care benefits from its compliance capabilities, facilitating secure data management and faster application delivery.

IBM

Spring MVC is a Java web framework built on the Servlet API and has been included in the Spring Framework from the very beginning. It handles web applications that use server-rendered HTML user interface, REST APIs, and much more. The documentation includes Spring MVC, View Technologies, CORS Support, and WebSocket Support.

For baseline information and compatibility with Servlet container and Java EE version ranges please visit the Spring Framework Wiki.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.