IBM Open Liberty vs Spring MVC comparison

The compared IBM and VMware solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #14 in AppS , and holds a 1.6% mindshare in the category. VMware is ranked #4 in JF , with an average rating of 9.5, and holds a 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

IBM Open Liberty

Read 1 IBM Open Liberty review

1,986 Views
99 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spring MVC

Read 15 Spring MVC reviews

841 Views
774 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Open Liberty

Spring MVC

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Server Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (14th)

Spring MVC

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Java Frameworks (4th)

Mindshare comparison

IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Open Liberty is designed for Application Server and holds a mindshare of 1.6%.
Spring MVC, on the other hand, focuses on Java Frameworks, holds 3.3% mindshare, up 3.2% since last year.

Application Server

Java Frameworks

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA

Founder at SouJava

Scalable solution with efficient monitoring features

We use the solution to develop microservices for financial organizations The solution has the best monitoring features. The solution's feature for distributed transaction management could be better. Also, its login feature needs improvement as well. The solution is much more stable compared to…

Read full review

Arkabrata Ghosh

Java developer at Marlabs Inc.

A scalable tool with great auto-configuration capabilities

The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities. A user need not configure anything in the product as it offers configuration files to set profiling and guide users with what they need to connect for development, staging, or production. The auto-configuration is one of the best components of the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."

"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."

"The most valuable feature of Spring MVC is the configuration, such as WAF."

"It provides the best documentation for technical support."

"We have found Spring is easy to use and learn."

"The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities."

"The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"The solution is open-source and free to use."

"The most valuable features of Spring MVC are the modules, such as Spring Admin. All the Spring solutions work well together and are simple to maintain, such as the load balancing on the client side."

More Spring MVC pros

Cons

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."

"The solution could be simplified quite a bit. It's unnecessarily complicated in some areas."

"I have recently had problems with the changes that were made using Spring Security."

"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."

"It can be difficult for a basic user to understand the concepts in this solution, such as inversion of control."

"I saw some error messages coming up when they were getting problems actually viewing all the reports."

"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."

"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."

"Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications."

More Spring MVC cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."

"We are using the open-source version of the solution."

"The solution is free."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."

"Spring MVC is open source and free."

"It is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

52%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which solution do you prefer: Spring Boot or Open Liberty?

Sometimes, Open Liberty is preferred over Spring Boot because Open Liberty is lightweight, scalable, and secure. It is also a good choice for microservices because it supports a wide range of deplo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spring MVC?

The best feature of Spring MVC is its auto-configuration capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spring MVC?

The solution is free.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spring MVC?

In the future, I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings.

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 83% of the time

Helidon vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 5% of the time

IBM WebSphere Liberty vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 4% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 3% of the time

Amazon Corretto vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM Open Liberty Competitors

Jakarta EE vs Spring MVC

Compared 43% of the time

Oracle Application Development Framework vs Spring MVC

Compared 13% of the time

Spring Boot vs Spring MVC

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Spark vs Spring MVC

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Corretto vs Spring MVC

Compared 9% of the time

More Spring MVC Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

August 2025

Download IBM Open Liberty product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring MVC

July 2025

Download Spring MVC product report

Also Known As

No data available

Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework

Overview

IBM Open Liberty is a highly adaptable and lightweight Java runtime, designed to cater to modern cloud-native applications. Its flexibility and commitment to open source makes it a valuable asset for developers seeking ease of deployment and scalability.

IBM Open Liberty stands out for its ease of integration into cloud environments and its emphasis on developer productivity. It permits quick iterations with minimal overhead, thanks in part to its support for MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. This allows for streamlined deployment processes, making contemporary software development more efficient.

What are the valuable features of IBM Open Liberty?

Lightweight Server: Minimizes resource consumption, enabling faster performance.
Dev Mode: Provides a real-time feedback loop, simplifying development cycles.
MicroProfile Support: Assists in building microservices architecture effectively.
Jakarta EE Support: Ensures compatibility with enterprise standards.

What are the benefits or ROI to consider?

Scalability: Adapts easily to increasing workloads while maintaining performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by optimizing server usage.
Developer Productivity: Accelerates development through intuitive tooling.
Cloud Readiness: Facilitates seamless integration with cloud platforms.

IBM Open Liberty finds applications across multiple industries. In finance, it supports robust transactional systems. In telecommunications, it enhances service delivery with reliable microservices infrastructure. Health care benefits from its compliance capabilities, facilitating secure data management and faster application delivery.

IBM

Spring MVC is a Java web framework built on the Servlet API and has been included in the Spring Framework from the very beginning. It handles web applications that use server-rendered HTML user interface, REST APIs, and much more. The documentation includes Spring MVC, View Technologies, CORS Support, and WebSocket Support.

For baseline information and compatibility with Servlet container and Java EE version ranges please visit the Spring Framework Wiki.

VMware

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Server. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.