IBM Open Liberty vs Spring MVC comparison

The compared IBM and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #8 in AppS , with an average rating of 10.0, and holds a 4.3% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #8 in JF , and holds a 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

IBM Open Liberty

Read 2 IBM Open Liberty reviews

1,948 Views
312 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spring MVC

Read 15 Spring MVC reviews

898 Views
835 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Open Liberty

Spring MVC

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Server Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (8th)

Spring MVC

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Java Frameworks (8th)

Mindshare comparison

IBM Open Liberty and Spring MVC aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Open Liberty is designed for Application Server and holds a mindshare of 4.3%.
Spring MVC, on the other hand, focuses on Java Frameworks, holds 5.1% mindshare, up 3.7% since last year.

Application Server Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Open Liberty	4.3%
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)	13.3%
Tomcat	13.2%
Other	69.2%

Application Server

Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Spring MVC	5.1%
Spring Boot	34.4%
Jakarta EE	17.6%
Other	42.9%

Java Frameworks

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA

Partner at SouJava

Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates

The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.

Read full review

reviewer2151066

Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Straightforward setup, highly stable, and useful online support

We are using Spring MVC based on our business problem statements One of the most valuble features for our business is the bootstrap which allows our developers to save time when developing code. Additionally, it has a built-in library that is useful. The most valuable features of Spring MVC are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important."

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."

"It provides the best documentation for technical support."

"When we shifted from our legacy frameworks to the Spring framework, we discovered that Spring definitely made our development easier. One good example is that there is a lot of boiler plate code available that you don't have to write from scratch, making the development of web applications a much simpler process."

"The most valuable feature is simplicity."

"The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."

"Spring has a speedy development process with a lightweight framework."

"Spring gives you the opportunity to develop architecture in the simplest way possible. It comes with everything you would want in terms of security. If you want to access the database, you have the ability to do that."

"The solution can scale."

More Spring MVC pros

Cons

"To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial."

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."

"It could provide faster performance."

"Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications."

"I have recently had problems with the changes that were made using Spring Security."

"I saw some error messages coming up when they were getting problems actually viewing all the reports."

"The initial setup could be more straightforward."

"It can be difficult for a basic user to understand the concepts in this solution, such as inversion of control."

"The solution could be simplified quite a bit. It's unnecessarily complicated in some areas."

"I expect the solution to offer and include a lot of packages so that it can be configured more easily or the speed level increases, thereby helping it overcome its shortcomings."

More Spring MVC cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."

"The solution is free."

"Spring MVC is open source and free."

"We are using the open-source version of the solution."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."

"It is an open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

50%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Open Liberty?

To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial. Having more integration with Kafka, Mongo, and middleware systems that ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty for an application for financial services using IBM Open Liberty and MicroProfile to process data for financial services work.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty in the past in a project, but today I'm not using it anymore. I had a good experience working with it in a financial services company. This was very beneficial. My review ra...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 62% of the time

IBM WebSphere Liberty vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 9% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 6% of the time

Helidon vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Open Liberty Competitors

Jakarta EE vs Spring MVC

Compared 19% of the time

Apache Spark vs Spring MVC

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Application Development Framework vs Spring MVC

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon Corretto vs Spring MVC

Compared 11% of the time

Spring Boot vs Spring MVC

Compared 7% of the time

More Spring MVC Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

February 2026

Download IBM Open Liberty product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring MVC

January 2026

Download Spring MVC product report

Also Known As

No data available

Spring by Pivotal, Spring, Spring Framework

Overview

IBM Open Liberty is a highly adaptable and lightweight Java runtime, designed to cater to modern cloud-native applications. Its flexibility and commitment to open source makes it a valuable asset for developers seeking ease of deployment and scalability.

IBM Open Liberty stands out for its ease of integration into cloud environments and its emphasis on developer productivity. It permits quick iterations with minimal overhead, thanks in part to its support for MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. This allows for streamlined deployment processes, making contemporary software development more efficient.

What are the valuable features of IBM Open Liberty?

Lightweight Server: Minimizes resource consumption, enabling faster performance.
Dev Mode: Provides a real-time feedback loop, simplifying development cycles.
MicroProfile Support: Assists in building microservices architecture effectively.
Jakarta EE Support: Ensures compatibility with enterprise standards.

What are the benefits or ROI to consider?

Scalability: Adapts easily to increasing workloads while maintaining performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by optimizing server usage.
Developer Productivity: Accelerates development through intuitive tooling.
Cloud Readiness: Facilitates seamless integration with cloud platforms.

IBM Open Liberty finds applications across multiple industries. In finance, it supports robust transactional systems. In telecommunications, it enhances service delivery with reliable microservices infrastructure. Health care benefits from its compliance capabilities, facilitating secure data management and faster application delivery.

IBM

Spring MVC is a Java web framework built on the Servlet API and has been included in the Spring Framework from the very beginning. It handles web applications that use server-rendered HTML user interface, REST APIs, and much more. The documentation includes Spring MVC, View Technologies, CORS Support, and WebSocket Support.

For baseline information and compatibility with Servlet container and Java EE version ranges please visit the Spring Framework Wiki.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

EMC, Aridhia, CoreLogic, CenturyLink, Humana, Purdue University, Tampon Run, ArtsPool, Charity Water, Center for ReSource Conservation, Manos Teatrales

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.