Windows 11 Reviews

I switched to Windows 11 just for compute use, testing something out of a separate tool on Windows.

What I like about Windows 11 are some Microsoft products and offices that we need to use.

The security should be more secure with better pricing.

I have been using it for six years.

I would rate the stability an eight.

Regarding the scalability, I prefer a rating of ten.

Approximately, we are using Windows 11 with many users or some users. I don't increase usage and I don't use it in that capacity.

Regarding technical support, I have not used tech support. No one has requested or contacted them.

In Windows 7, we had three or four users.

The setup of Windows 11 was easy to set up or complex to compare.

For deployments and maintenance, I require only a developer and some three people, which is only a developer.

I have not seen ROI with Windows 11. We only use the real and no one uses it, and we don't have three people.

I don't know if you need a license for Windows 11. I don't know what the office takes for the license or what needs to be answered.

I did not evaluate other operating systems before. Red Routing is the same.

I don't know what advice I can give to other people who want to start using Windows 11. My overall review rating for this product is 10.

The most valuable feature is animation. It is a good solution in terms of performance.

When I checked in Windows 11, compared to Windows 10 to 11, it is very high performance. I see the massive differences in Windows 11.

The convenience I got in Windows 10, like different editions, I can't find in Windows 11. Security patching is also higher in Windows 11, but many people look for patching software, but it's not easy to implement in Windows 11.

When I was using Winsel, a tool for the existing purpose, and completing the purpose of that is to complete the file, it would show an error and ask me to purchase the product. But now, instead of giving the product, we have a patch to loop the tool. This happened via dot key dot shared and dot bat solutions. So, that kind of convenience has not been provided in Windows 11.

There are other areas of improvement. I can feel a bit lagging in some of the applications, like Adobe applications. So those need to be fixed.

Additionally, as a core developer, we often require tools like Visual Studio. We, particularly, need some add-on tools we need to use. So, if possible, it will be re-implemented or de-implemented via Windows 11, which will be very helpful too. Like, one kind of, say, PLAMEX or one kind of say, a tool where we can run at least a set of courses in one place without installing any add-on software.

One more thing to mention is the TDM software. It requires compatible hardware to install Windows 11, and that can be a drawback. For instance, my old laptop doesn't support it, and I had to purchase a new one. This can be challenging, especially for students.

I've been using Windows 11 for four to five months. I have not updated it yet, so I don't use the latest version.

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. 

It wasn't deployed manually. We used the inbuilt version.

The price is quite high, especially in India. It's a significant investment.

I would advise you to consider Windows 11 due to the ongoing updates. But the supportable key is the worst part, which Microsoft has introduced. So that is the only thing I'm a bit disappointed about. So if anyone wants to get a new laptop, they need to go for the new generation, which costs around one or two lakhs in Indian currency. That's very costly for students who are still in the learning stage.

Overall, I would rate the solution a five out of ten. 

On-premises

We use the solution for multiple use cases in our organization.

The new search bar is a valuable feature. The performance is better than the previous version. Windows is one of the best operating systems an enterprise or user can use. It is better than other available operating systems in the market. The tool is easy to use.

The solution must improve its compatibility with other software like .NET or Java. Timely patches and updates from Windows will be more helpful in making it more effective and secure promptly. Generally, macOS is better at providing patches. It has fewer vulnerabilities. Windows must develop better code that can help minimize vulnerabilities.

Many tools are coming up with AI capabilities. Windows must also consider introducing AI capabilities. It will become easier to use. The tool’s performance must be improved a little bit. The vendor must focus on building more reliable hardware. The Apple hardware is designed specially. Apple devices' life span is much longer than that of any Windows device.

I have been using the solution for two years.

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten. There is room for improvement.

Since installation takes less time, we can easily scale the product. It's not a challenge.

The setup is straightforward compared to the previous version. The deployment takes five to ten minutes. The number of people needed for deployment depends on the number of systems in which we want to install the solution.

We need to pay for the license. I rate the pricing a five or six out of ten. The tool is expensive.

We use third-party solutions for security. I faced no challenges while integrating the solution with our IT infrastructure. There were a couple of dependencies, but it is normal when introducing a new operating system. There will be some dependency issues. By using Windows, we can easily focus on the other things rather than focusing on the system. The utility can be leveraged to deliver more value and focus on more important tasks. Other tools are ending support. I’m generally an early adapter of technology. I’m more curious about the new features and functionalities available in the operating systems.

Overall, I rate the product a seven to eight out of ten.

I frequently use extensive virtualization, managing multiple virtual machines for various tasks. Security is a top priority for me, and it hinges on two critical factors. Firstly, security software's effectiveness in detecting and responding to potential threats. Secondly, the underlying Windows system's reliability relies on regular updates from Microsoft. These updates, often in the form of security patches, play a crucial role in addressing vulnerabilities and ensuring the overall security of the Windows environment.

The use of TPM 2.0 is appreciated for its role in encrypting communication between the processor and RAM. Despite not being a prominent feature, this encryption is crucial for preventing potential attacks from penetration testers and hackers. By securing this connection, it significantly reduces the risk of a fundamental system breach. Even if a new operating system is installed, the underlying security remains intact, highlighting TPM as an essential security measure.

The most valuable aspect is the seamless integration and robust compatibility of other tools. The standout feature, known as the Linux App System Forwarded, enables the use of Linux commands within the Windows environment. Previously, I had to install specific Linux distributions to achieve similar functionality. Now, I can effortlessly enjoy both Windows and Linux simultaneously, making it a highly beneficial feature.

A significant drawback is its cost for the hardware requirements that is important for optimal performance which makes it less accessible and potentially impractical for many users globally. One notable additional feature is Windows Defender, an antivirus software by Microsoft. While it may not compete with other antivirus programs in terms of recognition, it serves its purpose effectively for many users. There's room for improvement, especially in the firewall aspect. Enhancements in the firewall's capabilities would elevate the overall security of the system.

I have been working with it for a year now.

It provides excellent stability capabilities. I would rate it nine out of ten.

It doesn't follow a scalable model; instead, it leans more towards specific hardware requirements. Currently, acquiring new hardware can be quite costly. At the moment, we have a total of forty PCs.

I recall having a few instances where I needed technical support, and I must say, the assistance provided was truly impressive.

Positive

I used a different solution, but I switched to Windows 11 because  security holds paramount importance for me, and any new acquisition in this regard always receives significant attention. The focus is primarily on refining and resolving issues to ensure effective protection services.

The initial setup was quite easy. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The deployment on hardware typically takes a total of twenty to thirty minutes. Typically, I navigate to Google and use the Media Creation Tool for Windows 11, enabling me to download the trial version. Subsequently, I installed it on a USB drive and connected it to the PC. Booting from the USB drive makes the process straightforward - I select the destination and network EFI system, then follow the steps. It requires no maintenance.

We accomplished a ninety percent of ROI.

The pricing is affordable. There are no additional add-ons or extra payments – just one initial price, providing everything needed.

I evaluated FEMCO, however, despite its user-friendly interface, not everyone is acquainted with the vendor. Windows, being the most popular choice, aligns well with my preferences.

I would recommend ensuring the acquisition of proper hardware. Some unofficial sources or tweaks may claim compatibility, but it's crucial to rely on reputable ones for optimal performance on a PC and to fully leverage its capabilities. Understanding the cost and having a well-thought-out migration plan is also vital when contemplating a new operating system. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

On-premises

The organization uses document management systems and enterprise tools such as M-Files and SharePoint. I have worked with Windows 11, both personally and in a business context.

Windows 11 is mainly used for support and provides improved performance compared to Windows 10. It is faster, and the device is optimized for Windows 11. Having Windows 11 on both my personal and company laptops made it easier for me to use.

Drives are a significant issue, and finding the correct drives for everything to function properly is challenging. I also faced issues with Teams, although it's unclear whether this is related to Windows 11 or Teams itself.

I migrated to Windows 11 yesterday.

I previously used Windows 10 before upgrading to Windows 11.

The setup was relatively quick, taking about two hours, including handling driver-related tasks.

I have a university license, so I do not pay anything for Windows 11.

I mentioned disliking Apple devices.

I rate Windows 11 eight out of ten. It is important to recognize available space for improvement.

I use Windows 11 for development environments and find it user-friendly.

The tool's pricing is expensive.

I have been working with the product for five years. 

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

Windows 11 is scalable. We faced challenges integrating it in multi-app environments, requiring complex API setups. Our organization has about 600+ users who use it regularly.

The tool's support is good. 

The setup is complex and not straightforward. Deployment takes about three to four hours at the production level. We need a team of about 30 people for deployment and maintenance, including senior staff, mid-level, and SREs.

We have in-house tech expertise to handle deployment. 

The licensing is expensive, but it's value for money. Many people need it for deployment in Windows environments. It's very much required at this time.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. I'd recommend it as a good, user-friendly product with good tech support that can enhance productivity.

I use the solution for my everyday tasks. I use it to run my Office suite. 

The tool is very stable and I don't recall a time the screen went blue which was common for Windows 7. The product's installation is fast. If I have any issue that prevents me from booting Windows 11, it will automatically run into auto-repair mode and fix those issues. Windows 10 had this functionality but it wasn't good. 

I would like to add a frontend to manage the virtual machines that are installed in Windows 11. It should also improve security which includes patching the vulnerabilities. 

I have been using the product for two years. 

The solution runs perfectly and there are no stability issues. 

Windows 11 is a very scalable product. In the past, we had to reinstall the OS. However, with Windows 11, all you have to do is type in the new key. My company has ten percent of users for the product. Most of the machines are still using Windows 10. 

I do my own technical support and I haven't faced any issues that would require assistance from Microsoft engineers. 

The product's setup was easy and straightforward. It automatically rebooted and I didn't have to do anything. 

My machine came with a Windows 10 license and I upgraded to Windows 11 without paying anything. If you buy a new computer, Windows 11 is included with it. 

The tool's updates are easier to apply. I would rate Windows 11 a ten out of ten. It's easy, fast, and intuitive. The solution keeps me connected to the internet and boosts my productivity. It also doesn't hang which is critical for anyone using the system. 

We use Windows 11 for desktop computing.

Windows 11 is an easy-to-use solution.

The solution’s pricing could be improved.

I have been using Windows 11 for a couple of months.

I rate Windows 11 ten out of ten for stability.

Windows 11 is not so scalable.

I previously used Windows 10.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

It was pretty fast to upgrade to Windows 11. The solution's deployment can be done in-house within a couple of hours.

We have seen a return on investment with Windows 11.

We pay for a yearly license for Windows 11. I rate Windows 11 eight out of ten for pricing.

I would recommend Windows 11 to other users.

Overall, I rate Windows 11 a nine out of ten.

I mainly use it for normal operations.

One valuable feature is the ability to snap windows to different sections of the screen, which is especially useful on big screens. 

Additionally, I like the tabbed interface in the command prompt, which helps me multitask while working on network analysis and other tasks.

I have noticed a difference in audio options when connecting my JBL headphones. In Windows 10, I had two options for meetings and general audio, with better bass in the latter. 

However, in Windows 11, I only have one option for audio, and the bass is not as good as it was in Windows 10. I miss that feature.

I would like Windows 11 to have the same audio options as Windows 10.

I currently use Windows 11. I've been using it for the last two to three months.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

Currently, I would give it a seven because I'm still fully exploring it to understand its strengths and weaknesses.

The initial setup is straightforward, similar to Windows 10. If you're already familiar with Windows 10, it won't be a problem.

In our organization, Windows 11 is deployed on end-user machines.

The pricing could be a little bit high, but personally, I'm using the free upgrade from Windows 10. So I've taken advantage of that. 

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend you to give it a try. It might work well for them, but they should also continue testing it until they are confident it meets their needs.

When we started using Windows 11 on our notebooks and desktops, we had no problems with the tools our users needed, so overall, it was a good transition for us. Most users in our company use Windows 11 for office work, mostly from home a couple of days a week. They mainly use it to manage information with Excel and Word, save files in the cloud, and access corporate activities via VPN.

The tool's most valuable feature is its stability. When we planned the migration, about 70 percent of it was done remotely. We encountered some incidents, which were resolved quickly. 

The product needs options for personalization and self-development. AI functions are also another area where improvement can be made. We're starting to use these features, but there's room for further development and integration.

I have been using the product since June 2023. 

We have a Microsoft partner in Brazil who handles local support. However, for issues that require level three or level four support, they initiate a process with Microsoft to address the problem. I need to follow up on this process.

Positive

I rate the tool's deployment an eight out of ten. It took six months to complete. The first step was to analyze and classify the users based on their needs and priorities. We categorized users into high, medium, or low priority based on their requirements. For example, users managing industrial information or accessing critical systems for IoT were given special attention.

I'm not directly involved in the financial aspects, but based on feedback from colleagues, Microsoft is flexible with pricing and addressing other licensing needs.

I rate the overall product a ten out of ten. I began my career using Linux many years ago. In Brazil, I witnessed the evolution of Windows, starting with Windows 3.1, then Windows Workgroup, and later Windows Server. Microsoft introduced Outlook, marking a successful journey for the company. Their support has been instrumental in the standardization and development of tools.

Hybrid Cloud