The documentation in general was adequate, though it could definitely be better. However, it was decent enough for what I needed. On a scale of 1-10, I rate n8n a seven out of ten.
In my opinion, n8n is leading at this point in features and flexibility, so Make and Zapier need to catch up quickly, otherwise n8n could capture the whole market. I am super excited about the recently launched features on user interface automation and looking forward to potential voice-related or voice AI agents within their system. The solution is absolutely efficient in terms of usage and is user-friendly. There is no difference when comparing it to Make at this point in time. It is very easy to use unless we are integrating it with a tool that does not have any APIs. On a scale of 1-10, I rate n8n a 9.
I haven't had an opportunity to utilize the error management system. We haven't explored the security module features completely, so it wouldn't be fair to conclude in a generalistic way. Our teams are still exploring that module. I would definitely recommend n8n to those who would want to use it, even though there are some challenges. It is one of the pretty effective products in the AI automation area, and it can grow leaps and bounds if some of these things are taken care of. It is pretty effective and one of the best tools I have seen. On a scale of 1-10, I rate n8n an 8.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) delivers cloud-based solutions, facilitating seamless connectivity across diverse systems and applications. For companies undergoing digital transformation, iPaaS helps streamline integration processes and ensures efficient data flow.Businesses embracing digital innovation leverage iPaaS to improve scalability and maintain agility. The solution supports multiple integration use cases, from cloud to on-premise systems, enhancing operational workflows...
The documentation in general was adequate, though it could definitely be better. However, it was decent enough for what I needed. On a scale of 1-10, I rate n8n a seven out of ten.
In my opinion, n8n is leading at this point in features and flexibility, so Make and Zapier need to catch up quickly, otherwise n8n could capture the whole market. I am super excited about the recently launched features on user interface automation and looking forward to potential voice-related or voice AI agents within their system. The solution is absolutely efficient in terms of usage and is user-friendly. There is no difference when comparing it to Make at this point in time. It is very easy to use unless we are integrating it with a tool that does not have any APIs. On a scale of 1-10, I rate n8n a 9.
I haven't had an opportunity to utilize the error management system. We haven't explored the security module features completely, so it wouldn't be fair to conclude in a generalistic way. Our teams are still exploring that module. I would definitely recommend n8n to those who would want to use it, even though there are some challenges. It is one of the pretty effective products in the AI automation area, and it can grow leaps and bounds if some of these things are taken care of. It is pretty effective and one of the best tools I have seen. On a scale of 1-10, I rate n8n an 8.