AWS Fargate emphasizes independence in deployment, simplifying processes without needing Kubernetes expertise. Its ease of use and automatic scaling for variable workloads make it ideal for quick deployment. Fargate's integration with AWS services enhances functionality, supporting seamless monitoring and improved efficiency. Users appreciate its cost-effectiveness and ability to scale services according to demand, enabling flexible infrastructure management. Fargate's self-managed nature and compatibility with containerization are highly valued across diverse applications.
- "What I find best about AWS Fargate is that compared to deploying containers on EC2, where we need to check everything manually such as uptime, error logs, and other issues, AWS Fargate manages all these aspects automatically."
- "What I find best about AWS Fargate is that compared to deploying containers on EC2, where we need to check everything manually such as uptime, error logs, and other issues, AWS Fargate manages all these aspects automatically."
- "The best thing about AWS Fargate is that I don't need to worry about the proper provisioning of infrastructure for my task, and it's very fast in terms of scaling my containers; it's much faster than other solutions."
AWS Fargate requires improvements in cost management and prediction, setup complexity, and user-friendliness. Users find challenges with integrating microservices, lack of control, privileged mode container issues, and robustness in monitoring and error handling. There are requests for enhanced documentation, better dashboard versions, and improved scaling features. Current users appreciate simplicity but wish for container management similar to Kubernetes and seek enhanced auto-scaling, faster application scaling, and improved integration with AWS services.
- "They need to improve some UI-based interaction."
- "They need to improve some UI-based interaction."
- "There could be improvements for AWS Fargate regarding cost as it is expensive compared to running on EC2."
