Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025
AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling both compete in the cloud resource management category. AWS Fargate has the upper hand due to its serverless model and ease of use, especially for those new to cloud services.
Features: AWS Fargate provides a fully managed service with no infrastructure management, making it ideal for users without a strong DevOps team. It boasts automatic scaling and is cost-efficient for applications with variable workloads. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling offers automatic elasticity, robust integration capabilities, and configurable network options, suitable for high availability and persistence scenarios.
Room for Improvement: AWS Fargate needs improvements in cost predictability and simpler setup processes. More intuitive monitoring and integration tools are desired by users. Cost reduction would enhance its competitiveness. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling requires better documentation, flexible pricing models, and easier setup for scalable environments. Enhancing cost management tools is necessary for improved user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Fargate offers a streamlined deployment experience with strong customer service, especially with premium support. It is appreciated for its responsive support, although better contact methods could be beneficial. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling relies on user configuration and documented resources, which can be challenging for beginners, though it benefits from AWS's ecosystem.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Fargate utilizes a pay-as-you-go model, which can lead to higher costs for smaller operations but is valued for its serverless flexibility and reduced maintenance costs. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling also follows a usage-based pricing model that can be cost-effective if managed properly. Both services provide a good ROI but require mindful configuration and scaling practices to optimize costs.
To learn more, read our detailed
AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Report (Updated: December 2025).
