AWS Fargate vs Heroku comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Heroku solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 in CS , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 9.3% mindshare in the category. Heroku is ranked #17 in PSP , and holds a 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Heroku users who would recommend it.

AWS Fargate

Read 20 AWS Fargate reviews

4,033 Views
3,751 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Heroku

Read 29 Heroku reviews

4,079 Views
3,753 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AWS Fargate

Heroku

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Fargate and Heroku based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service.

To learn more, read our detailed Compute Service Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Compute Service

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Fargate

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Compute Service (4th)

Heroku

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (17th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Fargate is designed for Compute Service and holds a mindshare of 9.3%, down 11.2% compared to last year.
Heroku, on the other hand, focuses on PaaS Clouds, holds 2.9% mindshare, down 3.4% since last year.

Compute Service Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Fargate	9.3%
AWS Lambda	14.0%
Amazon EC2	13.9%
Other	62.8%

Compute Service

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Heroku	2.9%
Amazon AWS	13.3%
Microsoft Azure	11.3%
Other	72.5%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Jesus_Gomez

Head of Infrastructure at Teamcore

Flexibility in workload accommodation and supportive user experience drive efficiency

Currently, I think that the program is great the way it is, and maybe we use less than 50% of the current features of the platform. For example, we have been evaluating Dask with Python to work with distributed processing, and I don't know if AWS Fargate could be used to build Dask clusters, which would be great because there are many people on our team working with Python workloads. Having something that can manage distributed processing using Dask in a containerized deployment could be valuable. For a company that does not require complexity or managing Kubernetes clusters, AWS Fargate is a great way to go with the use of containers in a simple way, providing the power of containers and scalability without the complexity of going into Kubernetes.

Read full review

Faizan Haider

Senior Software Engineer at Aldaim Solutions

Used for server deployment and provides auto maintenance of databases

Heroku is deployed on the cloud. We can deploy our private and public projects over at Heroku. Most of the time, when we are starting any new project from scratch, we have to implement our MVP for that project or the core idea. We are unsure how our traffic flow will go or the actual production environment requirements. We don't want to spend the most on the server sites, so then we can use it with our go-to plan for Heroku, and all the resources are available in the basic plan with the minimum expenses. So, it helps us to deploy and make our features available online at the minimum cost. Once we know our needs, we can add the professional add-ons and shift it to another platform. Heroku supports any resource listed in the marketplace. We just have to deploy our AI solutions, and Heroku can also support AI projects. I would recommend the solution to other users. I advise users not to purchase extra add-ons but to make scalable resources so that they can use all the resources efficiently. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Fargate has many valuable services. It does the job with minimal trouble. It's very observable. You can see what's going on and you have logs. You have everything. You can troubleshoot it. It's affordable and it's flexible."

"What I find best about AWS Fargate is that compared to deploying containers on EC2, where we need to check everything manually such as uptime, error logs, and other issues, AWS Fargate manages all these aspects automatically."

"I like their containerization service. You can use Docker or something similar and deploy quickly without the know-how related to, for example, Kubernetes. If you use AKS or Kubernetes, then you have to have the know-how. But for Fargate, you don't need to have the know-how there. You just deploy the container or the image, and then you have the container, and you can use it as AWS takes care of the rest. This makes it easier for those getting started or if you don't have a strong DevOps team inside your organization."

"AWS Fargate has definitely impacted our organization positively because before that, we couldn't accommodate the workload requirements as flexibly as we can with Fargate."

"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."

"Its scalability and serverless nature make it a perfect hosting solution as it manages the scalability automatically when used with ECS, especially with the consistent process for deploying new solutions."

"The most valuable feature is the complete independence of doing administrative courses for your deployment."

"The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling process."

More AWS Fargate pros

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

"Deploying with git, npm install git hook ... basically, they got it right for nodejs servers hosting."

"My advice for anybody who is considering Heroku is that it's really simple to use, it's stable, and it is very powerful for continuous deployment."

"The product is stable."

"Easy, fast, fun, and extendable."

"The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us."

"I like the operations of the product because it makes it easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

"We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites."

More Heroku pros

Cons

"We faced challenges in vertically scaling our workload."

"AWS Fargate could improve the privileged mode containers. We had some problems and they were not able to run."

"They need to improve some UI-based interaction."

"If there are any options to manage containers, that would be good. That relates more to the cost point. For example, over the next three months, I'll be making a comparison between solutions like CAST AI and other software-as-a-service platforms that offer Kubernetes management with an emphasis on cost reduction."

"AWS Fargate's security features weren't the most important criteria or value we got from AWS Fargate."

"There are features that could be added or enhanced."

"There is a tool named Compose that helps in converting the Docker Compose file into a Kubernetes file. For ECS and Fargate, AWS reads a Dockerfile and helps with conversion. However, I am uncertain if it's ready for deployment after conversion."

"Challenges include higher costs for smaller clients, limited control over underlying infrastructure customization, and potential latencies during task startup."

More AWS Fargate cons

"I had an issue recently where my site was down intermittently for unknown reasons. I posted a ticket and 5 days have gone by without any resolution."

"Heroku is pretty stable. We experience the occasional outages."

"Their support is good, but they can improve their response time."

"Slow restart on servers"

"We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert."

"Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it."

"They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more."

"The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly."

More Heroku cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We would advise that this solution has a slightly-higher price point than others on the market. There is a free plan available for start-ups, but the free and lower range licensing models do not provide the full functionality."

"I rate the price of AWS Fargate a four out of five."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"Its price is very good."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"The tool is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Fargate?

They need to improve some UI-based interaction.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AWS Fargate?

Using AWS Fargate is becoming easier as the platform improves. On a scale of 1-10, I rate AWS Fargate a 7.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Fargate?

The pricing is dependent on the load being run. AWS Fargate follows a pay-as-you-go model, which provides flexibility. The pricing details can be easily found on the AWS Fargate website.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon EC2 vs AWS Fargate

Compared 17% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs AWS Fargate

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Batch vs AWS Fargate

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Lambda vs AWS Fargate

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon Virtual Private Cloud vs AWS Fargate

Compared 1% of the time

More AWS Fargate Competitors

Google App Engine vs Heroku

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 9% of the time

Render vs Heroku

Compared 8% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Heroku

Compared 3% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate

October 2026

Download AWS Fargate product report

Buyer's Guide

Heroku

October 2026

Download Heroku product report

Overview

AWS Fargate offers serverless container management with seamless scaling, monitoring integration, and cost-efficiency, enabling companies to focus on applications without infrastructure management.

AWS Fargate provides a scalable, serverless platform for container management that's easy to use and integrates with AWS services. It simplifies deployment, removing the need for Kubernetes while supporting diverse workloads. Fargate works with CloudWatch for monitoring and reduces infrastructure demands. Users appreciate the flexibility but look for improvements in application scaling speed, storage integration, and clearer documentation. Concerns include cost, service setups, and better UI features.

What are AWS Fargate's key features?

Flexibility: Adapt to varied workloads with ease.
Integration: Seamless connectivity with AWS services.
Ease of Use: No Kubernetes required for deployment and management.
Scalability: Automatic scaling for containerized applications.
Serverless Operation: Focus on applications, not infrastructure.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Lower expenses by minimizing infrastructure management.
Reduced Management: Automatic scaling and simplified management tasks.
Enhanced Focus: Allocate resources to application development over infrastructure.
Simple Deployment: Quick setup without advanced DevOps skills.

Organizations leverage AWS Fargate in industries for hosting websites, scaling data processing, and deploying applications. Its integration with EKS supports containerized applications, making Fargate a preferred option for internal deployments, hosting automation processes, and reducing costs compared to EC2 resources.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Heroku offers fast deployment with ease of use and seamless integration capabilities, making it a preferred platform for developers needing reliable continuous integration and scalability.

Heroku is known for handling server-related tasks, allowing developers to concentrate on building application functionality. Its automatic database maintenance and powerful performance are key for projects using Node.js and Ruby on Rails. Users appreciate its simple application deployment and maintenance, supported by a diverse range of plugins. Beyond efficiency, its CLI and dashboards enable a straightforward user experience, essential for developers focused on production, staging, and development environments.

What are Heroku's key features?

Fast Deployment: Offers rapid application deployment with minimal setup.
Continuous Integration: Supports streamlined integration processes for development cycles.
Scalability: Easily scales applications to meet growing demand.
High Availability: Ensures applications remain online and responsive.
Automatic Database Maintenance: Provides hands-off management of database tasks.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex tasks, allowing developers to focus on coding.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with tools like GitHub for updates.
Performance: Delivers consistent, reliable application performance.
Development Flexibility: Supports Node.js, Ruby on Rails, and Docker environments.

Organizations use Heroku to deploy production servers and stage development environments. Educational apps and offsite backends benefit from its Docker support. E-commerce, mobile app development, and web apps leverage Heroku's ability to maintain rapid development cycles and manage server deployment efficiently.

Heroku

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.