Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Heroku Logo

Top 10 Heroku Alternatives

Vendor: Heroku
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Heroku Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Heroku based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and Red Hat OpenShift. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Heroku Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Heroku, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Heroku Logo
Microsoft Azure
4.2 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Microsoft Azure
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Azure provides robust global application deployment with high security and seamless Microsoft service integration. In comparison, Heroku offers a simplified developer experience with easy deployments. Azure's complexity can be off-putting, while Heroku's scalability costs may deter some large-scale projects.
Download Heroku vs. Microsoft Azure Report
Microsoft Azure offers a flexible setup cost structure catering to various user requirements, while Heroku presents a straightforward, budget-friendly pricing model ideal for smaller projects. Azure's flexibility contrasts with Heroku's simplicity, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure offers a flexible setup cost structure catering to various user requirements, while Heroku presents a straightforward, budget-friendly pricing model ideal for smaller projects. Azure's flexibility contrasts with Heroku's simplicity, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
Heroku Logo
Amazon AWS
4.2 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Amazon AWS
4.2 out of 5
Amazon AWS offers extensive features like EC2 and RDS, supporting complex configurations for diverse workloads. In comparison, Heroku emphasizes simplicity and rapid development, ideal for quick setups. AWS's cost complexity contrasts Heroku's straightforward pricing, influencing tech buyers based on their scalability needs.
Download Amazon AWS vs. Heroku Report
Amazon AWS offers a flexible setup cost, while Heroku provides a straightforward pricing model. AWS's complexity caters to advanced users, contrasting with Heroku's simplicity, which suits developers seeking ease of use.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon AWS offers a flexible setup cost, while Heroku provides a straightforward pricing model. AWS's complexity caters to advanced users, contrasting with Heroku's simplicity, which suits developers seeking ease of use.
Heroku Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5
Heroku is preferred for simplicity and rapid deployment, making it ideal for smaller projects. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift attracts tech buyers with its robust customization and scalability, offering superior enterprise-level flexibility and control, notwithstanding a higher initial cost.
Download Heroku vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report
Heroku typically has a reduced setup cost, making it cost-effective for startups, while Red Hat OpenShift involves higher setup expenses, catering to enterprises seeking robust scalability and comprehensive services.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku typically has a reduced setup cost, making it cost-effective for startups, while Red Hat OpenShift involves higher setup expenses, catering to enterprises seeking robust scalability and comprehensive services.
Heroku Logo
Heroku Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Heroku offers a streamlined development experience ideal for startups with its ease of use and rapid deployment. In comparison, VMware Tanzu Platform provides robust enterprise solutions with deep Kubernetes integration, appealing to businesses seeking comprehensive capabilities and long-term strategic value.
Download Heroku vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Heroku offers lower setup costs, making it more accessible, while VMware Tanzu Platform involves higher initial expenses but provides extensive enterprise features.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku offers lower setup costs, making it more accessible, while VMware Tanzu Platform involves higher initial expenses but provides extensive enterprise features.
Heroku Logo
Heroku Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI)
3.9 out of 5
Heroku excels in simplicity, ideal for rapid deployment and ease of use, appealing to startups with competitive pricing. In comparison, OCI provides a comprehensive suite of enterprise services, justifying higher costs with advanced security and analytics for large-scale operations.
Download Heroku vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Report
Heroku has minimal setup costs, offering simplicity and rapid deployment. In contrast, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure typically involves more complex initial setup, which might lead to higher upfront costs and a steeper learning curve for new users.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku has minimal setup costs, offering simplicity and rapid deployment. In contrast, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure typically involves more complex initial setup, which might lead to higher upfront costs and a steeper learning curve for new users.
Heroku Logo
Google Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Google Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Heroku is ideal for startups with streamlined deployment and accessible customer service. In comparison, Google Cloud's vast infrastructure and comprehensive services cater to larger enterprises seeking scalability and advanced capabilities, despite its complex deployment model and potentially higher costs.
Download Google Cloud vs. Heroku Report
Heroku's setup cost is minimal, making it appealing for startups, while Google Cloud's initial investment is higher, reflecting its broad capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku's setup cost is minimal, making it appealing for startups, while Google Cloud's initial investment is higher, reflecting its broad capabilities.
Heroku Logo
Heroku Logo
Salesforce Platform
4.1 out of 5
Salesforce Platform excels in scalability and integration, fitting Agile models and benefiting marketing, sales, and lead management. In comparison, Heroku emphasizes fast deployment and ease of use, ideal for developers seeking simplicity and automated deployment, with effective integration tools like GitHub.
Download Heroku vs. Salesforce Platform Report
Salesforce Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Heroku, which offers a more affordable initial investment. This difference highlights Salesforce's comprehensive features versus Heroku's focus on flexibility and easy deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Salesforce Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Heroku, which offers a more affordable initial investment. This difference highlights Salesforce's comprehensive features versus Heroku's focus on flexibility and easy deployment.
Heroku Logo
SAP Cloud Platform
4.0 out of 5
Heroku Logo
SAP Cloud Platform
4.0 out of 5
Heroku offers straightforward app deployment and budget-friendly pricing for smaller projects. In comparison, SAP Cloud Platform attracts enterprises with its suite of integration tools and scalability, justifying its higher costs for organizations needing enterprise-level solutions and comprehensive support services.
Download Heroku vs. SAP Cloud Platform Report
Heroku's setup cost is straightforward and appeals to developers with limited budgets, whereas SAP Cloud Platform has a more intricate pricing model, catering to larger enterprises with complex needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku's setup cost is straightforward and appeals to developers with limited budgets, whereas SAP Cloud Platform has a more intricate pricing model, catering to larger enterprises with complex needs.
Heroku Logo
Heroku Logo
Pivotal Cloud Foundry
3.8 out of 5
Heroku offers agile deployment and ease of use, appealing to startups seeking rapid launch and simple pricing. In comparison, Pivotal Cloud Foundry excels in scalability and extensive integration, making it ideal for large enterprises valuing robust features and long-term return on investment.
Download Heroku vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report
Heroku typically incurs lower initial setup costs compared to Pivotal Cloud Foundry, which generally demands a higher investment due to its extensive features and enterprise focus.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku typically incurs lower initial setup costs compared to Pivotal Cloud Foundry, which generally demands a higher investment due to its extensive features and enterprise focus.
Heroku Logo
IBM Public Cloud
3.9 out of 5
Heroku Logo
IBM Public Cloud
3.9 out of 5
Heroku offers ease of use with flexible pricing and rapid deployment. In comparison, IBM Public Cloud provides advanced scalability and extensive AI integrations. Heroku appeals to projects with budget constraints, while IBM Public Cloud targets enterprises requiring comprehensive features for long-term growth.
Download Heroku vs. IBM Public Cloud Report
Heroku generally requires minimal setup costs, focusing on ease of use and quick deployment, whereas IBM Public Cloud may involve higher initial setup costs due to its extensive range of customizable infrastructure options, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku generally requires minimal setup costs, focusing on ease of use and quick deployment, whereas IBM Public Cloud may involve higher initial setup costs due to its extensive range of customizable infrastructure options, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
Heroku Logo
Google App Engine
4.1 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Google App Engine
4.1 out of 5
Google App Engine excels in scalable infrastructure and Google Cloud integration, benefiting applications with high scaling demands. In comparison, Heroku's user-friendly environment and rapid development capabilities attract startups and small businesses seeking ease of use and flexibility with third-party integrations.
Download Google App Engine vs. Heroku Report
Google App Engine has a straightforward, often lower setup cost compared to Heroku, which can incur higher fees due to add-ons and scalability features.
View comparison
Pricing
Google App Engine has a straightforward, often lower setup cost compared to Heroku, which can incur higher fees due to add-ons and scalability features.
Heroku Logo
Amazon Lightsail
4.4 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Amazon Lightsail
4.4 out of 5
Heroku appeals to startups with its easy deployment and integration with third-party services. In comparison, Amazon Lightsail attracts users needing comprehensive infrastructure with features like virtual servers. Heroku offers transparent pricing, while Amazon Lightsail provides value through extensive capabilities for resource-intensive needs.
Download Amazon Lightsail vs. Heroku Report
Heroku typically has higher setup costs compared to Amazon Lightsail, which offers a more economical setup option. The cost differences highlight Heroku's premium positioning, whereas Amazon Lightsail appeals to cost-conscious users seeking budget-friendly solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku typically has higher setup costs compared to Amazon Lightsail, which offers a more economical setup option. The cost differences highlight Heroku's premium positioning, whereas Amazon Lightsail appeals to cost-conscious users seeking budget-friendly solutions.
Heroku Logo
Cloud Foundry
2.5 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Cloud Foundry
2.5 out of 5
Heroku attracts tech buyers with its user-friendly interface and transparent pricing ideal for startups, while In comparison, Cloud Foundry offers enterprise-grade tools for large-scale applications, appealing to businesses that require extensive features and flexibility.
Download Cloud Foundry vs. Heroku Report
Heroku offers a low setup cost suitable for individual developers, while Cloud Foundry presents a scalable solution with higher initial expenses, catering to enterprise-level needs with extensive customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku offers a low setup cost suitable for individual developers, while Cloud Foundry presents a scalable solution with higher initial expenses, catering to enterprise-level needs with extensive customization options.
Heroku Logo
Heroku Logo
Virtuozzo Application Platform
4.4 out of 5
Heroku is ideal for developers prioritizing simplicity and language support. In comparison, Virtuozzo offers advanced container orchestration for those valuing performance. Heroku is cost-effective for startups, while Virtuozzo's higher upfront costs appeal to enterprises seeking long-term ROI with comprehensive features.
Download Heroku vs. Virtuozzo Application Platform Report
Heroku requires no upfront cost, while Virtuozzo Application Platform involves a moderate setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku requires no upfront cost, while Virtuozzo Application Platform involves a moderate setup fee.
Heroku Logo
Render
1 out of 5
Heroku Logo
Render
1 out of 5
Heroku is praised for user-friendliness, supporting multiple programming languages and easy integrations. In comparison, Render offers powerful automation, built-in SSL, and scalability, making it appealing for complex projects. Heroku's simplicity suits smaller teams, while Render's advanced features benefit experienced developers.
Heroku's setup cost tends to be higher, offering a range of features, while Render provides a more cost-effective setup with similar deployment capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku's setup cost tends to be higher, offering a range of features, while Render provides a more cost-effective setup with similar deployment capabilities.
Heroku Logo
Heroku Logo
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
4.4 out of 5
Heroku appeals with simplicity and ease, favoring quick deployment and straightforward pricing beneficial to startups. In comparison, AWS Elastic Beanstalk delivers extensive customization and integration, ideal for enterprises requiring advanced features within the AWS ecosystem. Heroku suits rapid development, while AWS supports complex scaling and savings.
Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Heroku Report
Heroku's setup cost is minimal, making it appealing for quick deployment, whereas AWS Elastic Beanstalk involves a more complex setup, reflecting its capacity for handling larger, scalable applications.
View comparison
Pricing
Heroku's setup cost is minimal, making it appealing for quick deployment, whereas AWS Elastic Beanstalk involves a more complex setup, reflecting its capacity for handling larger, scalable applications.
Heroku Logo
Heroku Logo
Engine Yard Cloud
1 out of 5
Engine Yard Cloud offers customizable infrastructure and competitive pricing, appealing to businesses needing tailored solutions and responsive support. In comparison, Heroku provides ease of use with seamless deployment and a flexible pricing model, ideal for companies prioritizing scalability and integration with third-party services.
Engine Yard Cloud reviews highlight a higher setup cost compared to Heroku's lower initial pricing. The pricing difference significantly impacts the entry cost for businesses considering these two cloud solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Engine Yard Cloud reviews highlight a higher setup cost compared to Heroku's lower initial pricing. The pricing difference significantly impacts the entry cost for businesses considering these two cloud solutions.

Related categories

PaaS Clouds
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
Server Virtualization Software