AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Heroku comparison

Read 29 Heroku reviews

3,610 Views
3,285 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Heroku and AWS Elastic Beanstalk are platforms competing in the cloud application deployment sector. Heroku is favored for its pricing and support, while AWS Elastic Beanstalk is noted for its comprehensive features.

Features: Heroku simplifies app development with easy scalability, integrated tools, and a straightforward environment. AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers automatic scaling, health monitoring, and extensive AWS service integration, providing flexibility through its robust service ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Heroku could improve in areas like offering more robust feature sets, enhancing customization options, and expanding integration capabilities. AWS Elastic Beanstalk may benefit from easing its learning curve, simplifying setup, and streamlining its intricate deployment processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Heroku provides a user-friendly deployment experience focusing on developer-centric services and responsive customer support. AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers powerful customization options, requiring a deeper understanding but providing comprehensive deployment features, backed by extensive support from Amazon.

Pricing and ROI: Heroku's transparent pricing appeals to startups and small businesses, offering a good return on investment for smaller applications. AWS Elastic Beanstalk's pay-as-you-go model is scalable, potentially providing higher ROI for large-scale applications due to its expansive features and service offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Heroku Report (Updated: September 2026).

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Heroku

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Beanstalk is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Heroku is 2.8%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Beanstalk	1.2%
Heroku	2.8%
Other	96.0%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Kunal Das

Test Engineer at Happiest Minds Technologies

Quick automation has simplified my app deployments and has let me focus on data engineering

The overall experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk was excellent. The performance made deploying and managing my application very easy, and it was really smooth and efficient. The automatic scaling can be improved so it can handle traffic changes more smoothly. I have given a rating of nine out of ten because auto scaling works reliably and it handles traffic spikes well with minimal manual effort needed. There is a balance between simplicity and control. I have not given a ten out of ten because sometimes the scaling decision can feel slightly delayed depending on the metrics. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is powerful, but not as advantageous or granular as ECS or EKS auto-scaling. Customization is good but not fully flexible for complex architectures.

Read full review

Cristian-Molina

Senior Developer at Go Coeupas

Has a quick development cycle and continuous integration

The initial setup is straightforward. Heroku integrates well. You only have to push the code, and it automatically deploys the new version. Whether you have permission depends on the application. Currently, I have one application that I deploy myself. I rate the initial setup a nine out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would rate the overall solution a ten out of ten."

"Elastic Beanstalk simplifies deploying and managing applications."

"Elastic Beanstalk helps reduce system administration as it automates many tasks."

"I highly recommend it to others and frequently discuss it with customers."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk helps improve my efficiency, saves time, and streamlines application hosting in the cloud."

"The most valuable feature of Elastic Beanstalk is its ease of use and management."

"I find the versioning to be especially valuable on AWS Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk is very easy to use, providing infrastructure to deploy our third-party application to the cloud within 15 to 20 minutes."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk pros

"They solve most of our problems and we don't experience many issues with them."

"My advice for anybody who is considering Heroku is that it's really simple to use, it's stable, and it is very powerful for continuous deployment."

"We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites."

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

"Lots of integrations"

"We, as a startup, can use Heroku and the plenty of possible configurations to scale from the very beginning to a medium-sized company."

"I have been a great fan of Heroku as it simplified my work for many years."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

More Heroku pros

Cons

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"Maybe the company could create more option packages, such as more bundles of configuration."

"Elastic Beanstalk is powerful, however, it could be enhanced in areas where it abstracts infrastructure management, sometimes limiting advanced users who want granular control over resources like EC2 instances, networking, or load balancers."

"Logs and debugging can sometimes be cumbersome, and there could be a more seamless method to analyze application issues without relying heavily on CloudWatch, which would improve my experience."

"One area where AWS Elastic Beanstalk struggles is with the complexity of deployments. As deployments become more complex, technical constraints can become a burden."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk could improve its auto-scaling feature to better detect potential AI-based attacks or misuses that could lead to unexpected costs."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part. Tasks like creating load balancers and retiring versions require manual code updates, and URL changes can be time-consuming."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk cons

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

"I have an issue with the session server in terms of how it can scale, and where I can put my sessions."

"The tool's configuration is complex."

"They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"Heroku is pretty stable. We experience the occasional outages."

"We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert."

"Heroku doesn't support Docker images on the CI infrastructure."

More Heroku cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool is free."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"Its price is very good."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

My experience with AWS Elastic Beanstalk regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good compared to other services.

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

I was using AWS Elastic Beanstalk to deploy my application and to learn data engineering concepts. I used AWS Elastic Beanstalk to test how to change data from raw to useful cases. In that way, I u...

What needs improvement with Heroku?

I don't like that the web server crashes every day, every 24 hours. The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly. The Docker features are not great. You cannot use any ...

What is your primary use case for Heroku?

We use the solution for web applications and web APIs.

What advice do you have for others considering Heroku?

The integration capabilities are great because of the quick integration and the management features. We don't need a lot of expertise and all external DevOps people. Heroku is the easiest platform ...

Microsoft Azure vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 15% of the time

Google App Engine vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Heroku

Compared 10% of the time

Google App Engine vs Heroku

Compared 10% of the time

Engine Yard Cloud vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

Render vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Product Reports

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk product report

Download Heroku product report

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk streamlines deploying and managing web applications, providing efficient session management, direct log access, and seamless rollback during deployment for uninterrupted operations.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed for developers seeking ease of use in provisioning and deployment without any application downtime. With auto-scaling capabilities that enhance application performance, users can deploy directly on EC2 or Dockerized environments. While it supports a range of application frameworks, improvements in integration with CloudFront, auto-scaling against AI-based attacks, and simplified HTTPS integrations are suggested by users. Additionally, expanding Docker support and enhancing documentation can address user challenges, offering a more comprehensive experience.

What features make AWS Elastic Beanstalk efficient?

Direct Log Access: Easily retrieve logs through the console for efficient monitoring.
Session Management: Manages sessions between Elastic Beanstalk and RDS smoothly.
Auto-Scaling: Enhances performance by adjusting resources automatically.
Versioning: Allows application changes without downtime, boosting flexibility.

What benefits do users find in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Continuous Operation: Seamless rollbacks ensure website functionality during deployments.
Ease of Use: Simplifies the provisioning of applications and environmental configurations.
Flexibility: Offers versatile framework support, catering to different application needs.
Integration: Facilitates integration with services like S3 and LoadBalancer for efficient management.

Organizations adopt AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications such as Django, Laravel, native PHP, and .NET Core. They leverage its management capabilities for environmental configurations like Python virtual environments and PHP-FPM. It's a practical tool for educators and businesses managing client migrations, utilizing its seamless integration with AWS services.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Heroku offers fast deployment with ease of use and seamless integration capabilities, making it a preferred platform for developers needing reliable continuous integration and scalability.

Heroku is known for handling server-related tasks, allowing developers to concentrate on building application functionality. Its automatic database maintenance and powerful performance are key for projects using Node.js and Ruby on Rails. Users appreciate its simple application deployment and maintenance, supported by a diverse range of plugins. Beyond efficiency, its CLI and dashboards enable a straightforward user experience, essential for developers focused on production, staging, and development environments.

What are Heroku's key features?

Fast Deployment: Offers rapid application deployment with minimal setup.
Continuous Integration: Supports streamlined integration processes for development cycles.
Scalability: Easily scales applications to meet growing demand.
High Availability: Ensures applications remain online and responsive.
Automatic Database Maintenance: Provides hands-off management of database tasks.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex tasks, allowing developers to focus on coding.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with tools like GitHub for updates.
Performance: Delivers consistent, reliable application performance.
Development Flexibility: Supports Node.js, Ruby on Rails, and Docker environments.

Organizations use Heroku to deploy production servers and stage development environments. Educational apps and offsite backends benefit from its Docker support. E-commerce, mobile app development, and web apps leverage Heroku's ability to maintain rapid development cycles and manage server deployment efficiently.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Heroku