AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to Google’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Google users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Read 11 AWS Elastic Beanstalk reviews

590 Views
590 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google App Engine

Read 36 Google App Engine reviews

1,646 Views
1,498 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Google App Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Google App Engine and AWS Elastic Beanstalk are competing Platform-as-a-Service solutions, both designed to simplify application deployment and management. AWS Elastic Beanstalk seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, despite higher costs.

Features: Google App Engine offers automatic scaling, ease of integration with Google services, and a user-friendly interface. AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides extensive configuration options, supports multiple programming languages, and offers deep integration with AWS services.

Room for Improvement: Google App Engine can improve its flexibility, robustness, and support for multiple programming languages. AWS Elastic Beanstalk could enhance simplicity for less experienced users, offer more cost-effective pricing models, and improve documentation quality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google App Engine simplifies deployment with a user-friendly approach and comprehensive documentation. AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a robust deployment model with extensive configuration capabilities and strong community support, though it may be complex for beginners.

Pricing and ROI: Google App Engine provides a cost-effective solution with a pay-as-you-go model, appealing to startups and smaller businesses. AWS Elastic Beanstalk, although more complex in pricing, promises significant ROI potential for larger enterprises leveraging AWS's extensive suite of services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google App Engine Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google App Engine

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google App Engine

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Beanstalk is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google App Engine is 2.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google App Engine	2.4%
AWS Elastic Beanstalk	0.9%
Other	96.7%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Harendra Sisodia

Business Analyst & Agile Strategist at Charles Schwab

Utilize auto-scaling and monitoring to efficiently manage application infrastructure

The key features of AWS Elastic Beanstalk include auto-scaling capabilities for applications experiencing traffic fluctuations, ensuring high availability and cost-effectiveness. AWS Elastic Beanstalk integrates with AWS CloudWatch to provide metrics like latency and CPU utilization, allowing easy monitoring of application performance. It supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, supports multi-environment for different stages of the application lifecycle, and is cost-effective as you pay based on the resources launched.

Read full review

Rajesh Kadyan

Senior Engineer at Brillio

Have managed resources seamlessly thanks to robust platform capabilities

The areas of Google App Engine that I would to improve or enhance include its allowance for complete end-to-end deployment and scalability; however, it is manageable only for a few languages. For instance, it doesn't support languages C and C++, only basic support for Node.js, Java, and Ruby. It's not a comprehensive solution for all scenarios. Moreover, the security feature is based on IAM roles, but it should ideally be based on Active Directory (AD) roles. For IAM-based roles, we need to add the proper users and provide all security permissions manually. In an AD-based model, we would simply add users to a specific group, and all permissions would be inherited.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Elastic Beanstalk simplifies deploying and managing applications."

"I highly recommend it to others and frequently discuss it with customers."

"The simplicity in the speed of provisioning users is what I like best about Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk is helpful and easy to manage services, even when dealing with multiple clients."

"I find the versioning to be especially valuable on AWS Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk helps reduce system administration as it automates many tasks."

"Elastic Beanstalk, based on my experience and recommendations from friends, is a good solution."

"AWS Elastic Beanstalk helps improve my efficiency, saves time, and streamlines application hosting in the cloud."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk pros

"The functions and features of Google App Engine that I have found most valuable are that it is serverless, and the learning curve is easy to follow."

"What I find most beneficial about Google App Engine is that we do not need to manage it since it's a fully managed serverless platform, allowing us to spend more time on development rather than managing and maintaining configurations."

"The most valuable features of Google App Engine include the ease of rolling back deployments when failures occur, the ability to track deployment times, and the feature to split traffic between different instances."

"What I appreciate most about Google App Engine is that the deployment is significantly easier compared to a conventional Linux platform."

"The auto-scaling feature helped us significantly in our fast-paced environment where the number of users was increasing rapidly."

"The product's setup and deployment phases are easy."

"The integration with Google's suite allows me to offer a comprehensive service to my enterprise clients."

"The WhatApp feature is the most valuable."

More Google App Engine pros

Cons

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part. Tasks like creating load balancers and retiring versions require manual code updates, and URL changes can be time-consuming."

"From what I've observed, it seems AWS has ceased further development on Elastic Beanstalk."

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"The automatic scaling functionality could use improvement."

"There are areas for improvement in Elastic Beanstalk, especially in the management part."

"One area where AWS Elastic Beanstalk struggles is with the complexity of deployments. As deployments become more complex, technical constraints can become a burden."

"Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options."

"Sometimes there are issues when auto-scaling with CloudFront."

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk cons

"Some features of runtime don't work well in App Engine."

"I am limited to sending a photo to five people. I want to be able to send a photo to many people, not just five."

"I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment. We know how to do it, but it could be easier to deploy it on laptops."

"The areas of Google App Engine I would to see improved or enhanced in the future include expanding inbuilt support for more programming languages than the current limited options such as Python, Go, and Node, ideally adding support for languages such as Java."

"Difficult to assess how pricing is managed."

"The initial setup is complex as it is customized based on different clients, and it can range from one to three years, requiring niche-specific technical resources."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The support for the Indian region is not as good as compared to the support that is offered to the regions in Europe."

More Google App Engine cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."

"If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."

"We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

University

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

AWS Elastic Beanstalk itself is free to use, but there are charges for other integrated services like RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ), ELBs, and EC2s. If only AWS Elastic Beanstalk is used, th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Elastic Beanstalk can enhance its customizability further, especially in terms of deployment options.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

I have used AWS Elastic Beanstalk ( /products/aws-elastic-beanstalk-reviews ) primarily to manage infrastructure. The main purpose is to offload the complexity of managing servers, operating system...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google App Engine?

The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google App Engine?

I believe it is reasonably priced. I've never heard anyone express that the licenses are too expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google App Engine?

The error logging system in Google App Engine could be enhanced. While there are troubleshooting documents with Google-defined error logs, identifying the exact root cause can be challenging. Often...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Lightsail vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 25% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 21% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Compared 13% of the time

More AWS Elastic Beanstalk Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Google App Engine

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine

Compared 18% of the time

Heroku vs Google App Engine

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google App Engine

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Google App Engine

Compared 4% of the time

More Google App Engine Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download AWS Elastic Beanstalk product report

Buyer's Guide

Google App Engine

January 2026

Download Google App Engine product report

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk streamlines deploying and managing web applications, providing efficient session management, direct log access, and seamless rollback during deployment for uninterrupted operations.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is designed for developers seeking ease of use in provisioning and deployment without any application downtime. With auto-scaling capabilities that enhance application performance, users can deploy directly on EC2 or Dockerized environments. While it supports a range of application frameworks, improvements in integration with CloudFront, auto-scaling against AI-based attacks, and simplified HTTPS integrations are suggested by users. Additionally, expanding Docker support and enhancing documentation can address user challenges, offering a more comprehensive experience.

What features make AWS Elastic Beanstalk efficient?

Direct Log Access: Easily retrieve logs through the console for efficient monitoring.
Session Management: Manages sessions between Elastic Beanstalk and RDS smoothly.
Auto-Scaling: Enhances performance by adjusting resources automatically.
Versioning: Allows application changes without downtime, boosting flexibility.

What benefits do users find in AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Continuous Operation: Seamless rollbacks ensure website functionality during deployments.
Ease of Use: Simplifies the provisioning of applications and environmental configurations.
Flexibility: Offers versatile framework support, catering to different application needs.
Integration: Facilitates integration with services like S3 and LoadBalancer for efficient management.

Organizations adopt AWS Elastic Beanstalk for deploying web applications such as Django, Laravel, native PHP, and .NET Core. They leverage its management capabilities for environmental configurations like Python virtual environments and PHP-FPM. It's a practical tool for educators and businesses managing client migrations, utilizing its seamless integration with AWS services.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google App Engine

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google App Engine

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google App Engine and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. Google App Engine report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.