Apache JMeter Reviews

We utilize it solely for load testing and performance testing. 

JMeter is user-friendly, and that's a notable advantage of JVTech. It's straightforward and easy to use, unlike some other load testing tools, making it very easy to understand.                

I have been using Apache JMeter for the past 4 to 5 years. 

The last time I used it, there were some APIs that I tested, and they were running well before. We didn't make any changes to them, but when I tried to check them again recently, they didn't go through. It seemed like an issue at the integration level. I'm currently working on getting half an automation, where I'll have separate linear and rest. But that's the situation so far.

I prefer tools that I can easily teach people within twenty minutes, and JMeter falls into that category. It's part of the tools I use to help others learn load testing. While JMeter can be a bit tricky, I find it easy to grasp and teach. It's user-friendly, and I can quickly introduce someone to it. It's a tool that I can easily exchange with others, and I aim to achieve proficiency in it soon because of its simplicity and ease of use.

We are using this for performance testing and some automation. We consolidate the test data in our own systems and then use an API to send this data to JMeter. The software testing team then uses it to perform all the tests they wish to do. Nowadays, we are mainly focused on regression testing and working with that.

It works really well. 

To be honest, the UI could be more user-friendly. As a UX guy, I believe it's quite cold. The solution that I have nowadays is a very traditional one. So, there is room for improvement in the UI of Apache JMeter. 

I have been using Apache JMeter for two years. We have it in-house. It's a solution that my company has been using for a long time.

There are around seven users in my company using this solution. 

In terms of setup, it's quite simple. It has its benefits, but we are already used to it. In terms of experience, it could be nicer, to be honest. Sometimes, I get a little bit lost.

Two people are required for the deployment and maintenance. They can be he managers, tech leads, engineers, or developers.

The users need to pay for licenses.

We are not switching because we have several testing teams, and we sell them to several customers. So the solution sometimes is not ours; it's the customer's, and they provide some licenses because usually, companies like Vodafone have corporate licensing. They can provide licensing without being responsible for it. 

We also have our own solutions, but we are not sometimes responsive before saying I don't want to use this or I don't want to use that. Because we are an outsourcing company, we put people accordingly to the field desired by our customers. So if I need a Selenium expert or an Optimum or TestRail, whatever, I go to the market, and I outsource this to the customer.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. I recommend it because I know a lot of people who use it, and they don't have any complaints.

We have a Neotys slave server configuration where we have one server that caters to three servers, and we test most of the load on Apache JMeter, particularly for a hundred users. We test the load for web applications, services, and the rest of the APIs, though our current setup for Apache JMeter isn't that big.

Initially, Apache JMeter had a complex configuration; its UI was tricky and required a lot of resources. Creating scripts and running tests on Apache JMeter was always confusing, but nowadays, with more documentation and UI enhancements, Apache JMeter has improved. Previously, recording and creating scripts was tricky, and you had to do it manually. Now there's a recording facility in Apache JMeter that lets you create and modify scripts and test faster, which helped improve my organization.

To me, what's most valuable in Apache JMeter is that it's a lightweight tool for application testing. It's the best load-testing tool for my company because Apache JMeter simulates your application during testing. Apache JMeter also creates threads with good server utilization. Apache JMeter allows you to focus on analyzing the situation, looking into measurements, response time, and client-server responses, which I find valuable.

Both scalability and stability could be improved in Apache JMeter.

What I'd like to see in Apache JMeter in the future is ease of use in terms of scripting. A recording capability similar to what LoadRunner offers, where you can record scripts, make some modifications, then the script will be ready, is another advanced feature I'd like Apache JMeter to have. The two features would make it easier for new users to learn how to use Apache JMeter and help users utilize the tool more quickly.

I've been using Apache JMeter for more than six or seven years.

Apache JMeter isn't as stable because it sometimes crashes when you're running a test. The performance of Apache JMeter could be improved because testing on it isn't always as smooth sailing.

The tool is partially stable. You can't expect Apache JMeter to run well for enterprise-level, high-load applications. It's a good tool for more straightforward or lightweight web applications but not for CRM-type applications.

Scalability-wise, Apache JMeter could be improved because if you try to implement it on multi-servers, the threads running on the tool don't hold up well.

We used LoadRunner before using Apache JMeter. As Apache JMeter is open source, and we only needed to test lightweight applications, we were pretty sure we wanted to go with Apache JMeter.

Apache JMeter is an open-source tool that you can install directly from the web with binary files, so setting it up on one to two machines is easy. The setup could be tricky if you hook Apache JMeter to three or more different machines, and it's also tricky when you execute it after.

We implemented Apache JMeter in-house.

I've seen ROI from Apache JMeter, mainly because it doesn't cost much to maintain, and we can use it on a few lightweight applications.

We didn't pay licensing fees for Apache JMeter because it's an open-source tool. We only paid for the machines where we installed Apache JMeter modules.

I have experience with Apache JMeter, with version 5.5. as the most recent version I've used.

Apache JMeter is deployed on-premises, but my company did a POC with Apache JMeter and BlazeMeter. BlazeMeter is a CA proprietor tool where you can hook up Apache JMeter scripts. BlazeMeter is a cloud-based tool where you can run tests with the help of Apache JMeter scripts.

At the moment, only two people use Apache JMeter within my company. Two people can handle the deployment of Apache JMeter, while only one person is required to maintain it.

My advice to people looking into implementing Apache JMeter is to make the decision based on the application portfolio. For example, if it's more diverse, then using Apache JMeter could be tricky, but if you're only testing lightweight applications, Apache JMeter will be a viable solution.

Apache JMeter requires minimal investment, yet it has some returns, and it's a good tool, so I'm rating it as seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for performance and delivery testing.

It's a free tool. It's a very common tool. There's a lot of support in the community for this. It mainly supports web API testing.

The UI could be better. It can have some Reach UI also, which would be helpful, and maybe a relatively simpler way of using it. It needs simple modules. There are quite a lot of things which are kind of abandoned, so they can definitely improve on it.

Integration with some of the other features should be managed. However, it's open source, so there is not much to complain about there.

It's an open-source tool; we cannot ask for additional features really.

The product could use some kind of filtering and monitoring and different degree of dashboards and analysis. If that can be provided, that would be very, very helpful.

I’ve used the solution since 2009.

The solution is relatively stable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn’t crash o freeze. It’s reliable.

It can scale. However, what others say about scalability is that you need to have some proper calculations to be done first.

We have dealt with support. Technical support is found in more technical forums. It’s open-source, and communes are where you go for information. We have received good responses when we have inquiries. There are quite a lot of forums in general available.

Now, as we have grown as an organization or as a team, there are still questions such as, "What are the limitations of this tool?" And we put that to JMeter so we can learn what is best for the maintenance.

The installation can be a bit complex. There are quite a lot of things and issues if you go deep into it and if you're setting up JMeter. For example, direct script captioning is slightly different. It's a bit more complex, the correlation parametrization. Setting up the workload model can be complex as it is based on a Java service mechanism.

It becomes a bit challenging to manage. If I want to put a 50,000 user load, I have to be very careful how the memory is utilized. I must be very aware of the underlying system's capability to execute this. I have to make it into multiple nodes and run them in parallel. There are some calculations, and there are some good power processes that will be required when you are using JMeter. You need to understand its limitations and load work them on.

The solution doesn’t really need maintenance. They're open-source tools, so we don't expect any maintenance. What we typically do is we pick up a particular version and understand the limitations of it. We then play within those limitations.

We handled the initial setup in-house. I handled the setup myself.

The solution is free to use.

We may be using the latest version. I don’t know the exact version number.

It is on-prem. However, we can put it on the cloud as well. We install it on any machine, so it can be a local or cloud-based machine.

I’d recommend JMeter. One critical piece of advice is to plan properly. For JMeter, planning and having an understanding of the limitations are important. If you play within those limitations, it is a really great tool. There are trade rules that apply to a lot of things that we use. However, there's plenty of material available so far. Whoever is doing it, can plan it accordingly. They can create those tests, and execute those tests. That said, at the same time, be aware of the scalability of the JMeter. For example, a single JMeter line, which is running, can take 1,000 to 2,000 threats, not more than that. Again, it depends on the available hardware. If you want to scale to, say, one million or something, different parts of planning are needed.

I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.

We have a couple of applications in banking.

It's an open-source tool, Apache JMeter. 

It's easy to customize. Customization depends on the requirements, however. It provides an enormous amount of plugins. Based on the customer requirements, we can customize our code and we can go out and execute the test. JMeter integrates well with Jenkins. The cloud offers CI/CD activity. 

The solution is scalable.

The stability is good. 

Its initial setup is very easy.

There is good documentation available. 

Until now, JMeter is not supporting most of the protocols. It's widely using web HTTP and a few other protocols as well, however, it's not supporting the SAP or Citrix ones. Protocol-wise, the JMeter needs to improve.

Recently, there was a Log4j error. They have since mitigated that, in JMeter, for the free version. The security concern was handled quite well compared to the previous versions.

I've been dealing with the solution for more than five years.

The solution has been stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

It's scalable. We have very good load balancing or load distribution. It will be very easy for us to add multiple machines and make whatever we need. However much we want, we can scale.

It is very easy to set up. It's not overly complex or difficult. 

The solution does offer a free version. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Apache JMeter is quite flexible and it is also well distributed. It is quite flexible compared to Micro Focus LoadRunner.

JMeter is easy to script. There is less of a problem with doing correlations and parameterization. 

It is not something that can be compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner. It gives the facility too easily; you do things through UI. With JMeter, you really do not have any easy UI to work as, like a Micro Focus LoadRunner.

The stability could be a bit better.

Compared to LoadRunner, it hasn't any proper UI. Recording the script is also not flexible in JMeter. In LoadRunner, we have a couple of options, such as URL-based recording and HTML-based recording. In JMeter, it's not like that. JMeter has a recorder, however, it is not easy to use. It is a bit tricky to configure the automatic recording in JMeter. 

I've been using the solution for four or five years. 

JMeter, stability-wise, is good, however, it is being developed by the community. Therefore, stability is always an open question there.

The solution can scale a bit. It is scalable, however, not like LoadRunner. I have not tested it as such yet. I'm not sure about how fully scalable it is. 

I'm also familiar with Micro Focus LoadRunner.

The implementation process is not so easy. It's difficult to configure.

I'd rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I'm an end-user and a customer. 

We use Apache JMeter for performance testing, including the response time of our websites for multiple users.

The product is specialized in performance testing. It gives accurate results and recommendations that we can implement to enhance the performance of websites.

Apache JMeter could be a more user-friendly product from the end user's perspective. It requires someone with technical knowledge to administer it. This particular area needs improvement.

We have been using Apache JMeter for a year.

I rate Apache JMeter's stability a ten out of ten.

We have around 12 Apache JMeter users in our organization. I rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten.

The technical support team responds quickly to queries.

The initial setup process is very complicated for the on-premises version. It would be better to use the cloud version.

The product has reasonable pricing.

It is a complete tool that integrates lots of functionality. I recommend it to others and rate it a nine out of ten.

I use the solution in our organization for load testing.

The solution's automation capabilities are one of the best parts of the solution. Due to process automation, I don't have to prepare reports, making it the perfect solution. Whenever I require a report, the report gets generated by the solution, and then afterwards, I can look at the reports before copying and pasting them.

At times when we overload the application, it gets stuck. Especially with load testing, it gets stuck when we deal with huge numbers of 100 to 1,000-10,000 or 2,000 to 20,000. I believe that we should be able to hit around a million people without any issues. After the solution gets stuck due to overloading, we have to restart our computers. In short, the solution keeps crashing.

Apache JMeter is a simple solution, and I have been using it for seven years. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

After an update in the application, the stability gets hampered if we continue to use its non-updated version, causing the solution to crash. So, once I faced that problem since I was not updating the application, it crashed. Back then, I wasn't aware that an update was available for the solution, which I had to apply to the solution. So, for two or three days, I tried to solve the issue with the solution. Later, I found that I just needed to update the application. So, after I updated the application, it started working fine. I rate the solution's stability a seven out of ten.

Since Apache JMeter is a scalable product, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. I am the only person using the solution in my organization.

Since I have experience with the solution's customer support team, I rate the technical support of the solution an eight out of ten.

Positive

On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup a ten out of ten.

The solution's deployment process took only a couple of hours. I believe it took me around an hour or so at the beginning during the initial setup phase. Right now, I can deploy the solution in fifteen to twenty minutes.

Maintenance for the application is only required when the application crashes due to its overuse.

Since we are using an outsourced solution, it is not paid for by our company.

My words to those planning to use the solution is that if the crashing issues in the solution get resolved, it is one of the perfect solutions in the market. Also, I have not used the paid version, so I have no idea how it works. It's a very resourceful solution.

I need to use the paid version to be able to comment on it. Since we are using the free version in a company, even if the solution makes any mistakes, we ignore those and go ahead.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.